Prostate cancer incidence in men with self-reported prostatitis after 15 years of follow-up.

Controversy exists regarding a possible association between prostatitis and prostate cancer. To further evaluate the incidence of prostate cancer following prostatitis, a study of prostate cancer incidence in a cohort of Finnish men was performed. The original survey evaluating self-reported prostatitis was conducted in 1996-1997. A database review was conducted focusing on prostate cancer diagnoses in the cohort. In 2012, there were 13 (5.2%) and 27 (1.8%) prostate cancer cases among men with (n=251) and without (n=1,521) prostatitis symptoms, respectively. There were no significant differences in age, primary therapy distribution, prostate-specific antigen levels, Gleason score, clinical T-class at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis, or time lag between the original survey and prostate cancer diagnosis. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of prostate cancer was 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-1.99] and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.29-0.64) among men with and without prostatitis symptoms, respectively. After 15 years of follow-up subsequent to self-reported prostatitis, no evident increase in incidence of prostate cancer was detected among Finnish men with prostatitis symptoms. The higher percentage of prostate cancer among men with prostatitis symptoms appears to be due to coincidentally low SIR of prostate cancer among men without prostatitis symptoms, and may additionally be due to increased diagnostic examinations. Further research is required to confirm this speculation.

Treatment of renal angiomyolipoma: pooled analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the impact of baseline characteristics and treatment methods on the outcome of sporadic renal angiomyolipoma (AML). METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of individual data of 441 patients with AML retrieved from 58 studies and 3 institutional series. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients underwent nephrectomy, 163 partial nephrectomy/enucleation, 128 embolisation, 19 cryoablation, 6 radiofrequency ablation, and 32 conservative treatment. Their mean follow-up period was 44.5 months. Patients who experienced major bleeding at presentation had significantly larger tumours than did those without bleeding (mean diameter, 10.1 vs. 5.9 cm, respectively; p < 0.0001). A total of 9.4 % and 26.4 % of bleeding tumours had a diameter of <4 and <6 cm, respectively. A tumour diameter of ≥8.0 cm (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95 % confidence interval, 1.20-4.77) and the treatment method (p = 0.001) were independent predictors of re-intervention. The risk of re-intervention was significantly higher after embolisation, particularly for large tumours (5-year rate of freedom from re-intervention: diameter of ≥8.0 cm, 49.2 %; diameter of <8.0 cm, 74.8 %; p = 0.018). Conservatively treated AMLs had a mean baseline diameter of 3.2 ± 2.7 cm; after 41 months, their mean diameter was 3.7 ± 3.1 cm (p = 0.109). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of major bleeding is high in sporadic AMLs with a diameter of >6 cm. These results suggest that conservative treatment can be considered in AMLs of <6 cm in diameter. Among current treatment methods, embolisation was associated with a significantly higher risk of re-intervention. Further studies are needed to define risk factors for bleeding and assess the relative benefits of different treatment modalities.

Changing trends in symptomatology, diagnostics, stage and survival of prostate cancer in Northern Finland during a period of 20 years.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in many countries. The aim of the present study was to find out how the symptoms leading to a diagnosis, diagnostic procedures and stages of the disease among prostate cancer patients have changed over a period of 20 years. METHODS: This retrospective chart review consisted of 421 prostate cancer patients whose treatment was started in the years 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997 and 2002 at the Oulu University Hospital. Earlier prostatic disorders, specific urological symptoms, diagnostic procedures, the TNM classification and histological grade were recorded. RESULTS: The number of symptom-free prostate cancer patients increased over the 20 years, as did the number of men suffering from chronic prostatitis, although the latter increase was not statistically significant. A drop in the number of clinical T4 cases and increase of clinical T1 and clinical T2 cases was recorded but no clear change in the histological distribution occurred. The 5-year prostate cancer-specific survival improved significantly over the 20 years. The urologist was found to be the person who was contacted first most often. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the number of prostate cancer patients has increased hugely over the period from 1982 to 2002 and although the clinical T stage has moved towards earlier stages, the proportion of well differentiated cancers remains low, so that most patients have clinically significant cancer with the need of some form of therapy. Further, prostate cancer-specific survival improved significantly over the period.

Critical issues in chronic prostatitis.

In the last decade, an impressive amount of clinical research data has shed new light on pathogenesis and management of the chronic prostatitis syndrome. A new classification and a validated symptom score have enabled urologists worldwide to speak a "common language", thus greatly improving the amount and quality of focused research in this field. In Europe, a large number of groups and experts have been actively involved in this research, and have developed in many cases a genuine view on prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain etiology, diagnosis and treatment. The present paper, written by a panel of researchers from Europe and Far East Russia, reviews the most recent findings, discusses the most controversial contemporary topics on prostatitis syndromes, and highlights a number of unresolved issues requiring further research and study.

Alfuzosin treatment for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a prospective, placebo-controlled study to examine the long-term efficacy of alfuzosin compared with placebo and standard therapy in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), because alpha-blockers have been suggested for the treatment of CP/CPPS. METHODS: One hundred twenty consecutive men diagnosed with CP/CPPS were prospectively screened and then asked to participate in a prostatitis treatment trial. Patients who agreed to be randomized were subsequently randomized to alfuzosin 5 mg twice daily or placebo and patients who agreed to participate but not be randomized were entered into a control or standard (except alpha-blockers) therapy group. Patients were prospectively treated for 6 months and then followed up for an additional 6 months. The change from baseline in the total and domain scores of the validated Finnish version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) was the primary outcome parameter for this study. RESULTS: Seventy subjects agreed to participate in the study. The data from 66 patients were available for evaluation (17 in the alfuzosin, 20 in the placebo, and 29 in the control/standard group). At the end of 6 months of active therapy, the alfuzosin group had had a statistically significant decrease in total NIH-CPSI score compared with the placebo and control/standard groups (9.9, 3.8, and 4.3 decrease, respectively, P = 0.01). A statistically significant improvement occurred in the pain score in the alfuzosin group at 6 months compared with the placebo and control/standard groups (P = 0.01), but not in the voiding or quality-of-life score among the three groups. Of the patients in the alfuzosin group, 65% had a greater than 33% improvement in the mean NIH-CPSI total score compared with 24% and 32% of the placebo and control/standard groups, respectively (P = 0.02). At 12 months (6 months after the alfuzosin/placebo treatment was discontinued), the symptom scores in all domains of the NIH-CPSI showed deterioration compared with original baseline score in the alfuzosin and placebo groups but not in the control/standard group (NIH-CPSI score 3.5, 0.1, and 5.6 points below baseline, respectively). Gastrointestinal symptoms and a decrease in ejaculate volume were noted by 1 and 4 patients, respectively, in the alfuzosin group. No patients dropped out of the study because of an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of alfuzosin therapy for CP/CPPS is safe and well tolerated and results in a modest, but statistically significant, improvement in the NIH-CPSI, particularly in the pain domain, compared with placebo and standard/traditional treatment. The beneficial effect is only apparent after several months of treatment and disappears when treatment is discontinued.

Mechanisms of pain in chronic pelvic pain syndrome: influence of prostatic inflammation.

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), is of considerable interest in clinical urology. During the past decade, several new approaches have been made to discover its aetiology and pathophysiological mechanisms and to develop treatment modalities. The aetiology of CPPS has remained unresolved. Bacterial, chemical, urodynamic and immunological aetiologies have been suggested, but none of these has been conclusively proven. The histopathological changes in CP and CPPS are relatively well known, but the pathophysiological changes that lead to chronic inflammation and prolonged symptoms are still poorly understood. This review proposes an additional approach to the pathophysiology of CPPS. The concept of prostate tissue pressure is introduced as an objectively measurable parameter in evaluating the inflammatory process in CPPS. Chronic pain due to neurogenic inflammation and altered mast cell function is also discussed.

The chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome can be characterized by prostatic tissue pressure measurements.

PURPOSE: We performed a prospective study to confirm early results implying that intraprostatic tissue pressure is elevated in men with the chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome. We planned to determine further whether this technique would detect a significant difference in inflammatory and noninflammatory categories IIIA and IIIB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 patients with the chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome, including 18 with inflammatory category IIIA and 30 with noninflammatory category IIIB disease, and 12 asymptomatic controls completed a Finnish version of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. In addition, culture and microscopy of lower urinary tract segmented specimens, serum prostate specific antigen determination, transrectal ultrasound, uroflowmetry and ultrasound post-void residual urine measurement were done. All patients and controls also underwent independent intraprostatic right and left lobe tissue pressure measurement using a standard intracompartmental tissue pressure monitor system. Pressure was measured via an intraprostatic needle placed percutaneously in the perineum at baseline, and 10, 60 and 120 seconds after standard saline injection. RESULTS: All patients with the chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome had significantly higher pressure at all measurement points compared with controls (p <0.001). Mean intraprostatic tissue pressure was significantly higher (p <0.01) in category IIIA with greater than 10 leukocytes per high power field in prostate specific specimens compared with category IIIB with less than 10. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the suggestion that patients with the chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome have significantly higher prostate tissue pressure than controls. Findings also validated the previous clinical assumption that there is a rationale for differentiating chronic prostatitis-chronic pelvic pain syndrome cases into inflammatory and noninflammatory categories.