Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction During Posterior Cervical Fusion for Myelopathy Is Associated With Superior Radiographic Parameters But Similar Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: For laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion (LPSF) surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), the evidence is unclear as to whether fusions should cross the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ). OBJECTIVE: To compare LPSF outcomes between those with and without lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) crossing the CTJ. METHODS: A consecutive series of adults undergoing LPSF for CSM from 2012 to 2018 with a minimum of 12-mo follow-up were identified. LPSF with subaxial upper instrumented vertebrae and LIV between C6 and T2 were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were included: 46 crossed the CTJ (crossed-CTJ) and 33 did not. The mean follow-up was 22.2 mo (minimum: 12 mo). Crossed-CTJ had higher preoperative C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (33.3 ± 16.0 vs 23.8 ± 12.4 mm, P = .01) but similar preoperative cervical lordosis (CL) and CL minus T1-slope (CL minus T1-slope) (P > .05, both comparisons). The overall reoperation rate was 3.8% (crossed-CTJ: 2.2% vs not-crossed: 6.1%, P = .37). In adjusted analyses, crossed-CTJ was associated with superior cSVA (ß = -9.7; P = .002), CL (ß = 6.2; P = .04), and CL minus T1-slope (ß = -6.6; P = .04), but longer operative times (ß = 46.3; P = .001). Crossed- and not-crossed CTJ achieved similar postoperative patient-reported outcomes [Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck pain, VAS arm pain, Nurick Grade, Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Scale, Neck Disability Index, and EuroQol-5D] in adjusted multivariable analyses (adjusted P > .05). For the entire cohort, higher postoperative CL was associated with lower postoperative arm pain (adjusted Pearson's r -0.1, P = .02). No postoperative cervical radiographic parameters were associated with neck pain (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Subaxial LPSF for CSM that crossed the CTJ were associated with superior radiographic outcomes for cSVA, CL, and CL minus T1-slope, but longer operative times. There were no differences in neck pain or reoperation rate.

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF): Technique Video: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

This surgical video demonstrates the technique of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). This video demonstrates the surgical approach, technical nuances of ALIF, and pearls. The main surgical anatomy and approach-related risks are discussed. The video demonstrates the nuances of ALIF, discussing the importance of the release of the disc space to allow for height restoration and lordosis, endplate preparation to enhance arthrodesis, and choice of implant size. The incision is made via a left paramedian approach with a retroperitoneal dissection and mobilization of the vasculature for access to the disc space. The ALIF provides direct access to the ventral surface of the exposed disc, allowing for an incision of the anterior longitudinal ligament, bilateral release of the annulus fibrosus, and access to a large surface area of the vertebral endplate. This anterior access allows for the placement of implants with a greater surface area for fusion, and this facilitates restoration of segmental lordosis, disc height improvement, and foraminal height increase. We have received informed consent from this patient for the video of this case.

Posterior Column Osteotomy of the Lumbar Spine: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

The posterior column osteotomy (PCO) is a tool for correction in spinal deformity. It allows for the induction of lordosis and coronal plane correction. It can be performed at multiple levels to loosen and mobilize the spine. Although the PCO does not provide as much correction as a 3-column osteotomy, it can be done in less operative time and with less morbidity. Performing a PCO involves the resection of posterior bony elements, including entire facet complexes, the ligamentum flavum, and at least part of the lamina. The ligamentum flavum laterally is also resected, and the exiting nerve roots are skeletonized bilaterally. Compression of the osteotomy can cause foraminal stenosis, and it is important to ensure that the exiting nerve roots are adequately decompressed to avoid potential postoperative radiculopathy. The authors present an illustration of the technique with saw bones, a clinical case describing the use of PCOs, and an intraoperative video of a PCO performed at L5-S1. The patient consented to the surgical procedure and video/image recording for possible publication purposes prior to the operation being performed.

Navigated minimally invasive facet fusion during percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw insertion: Technical note.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), or percutaneous, lumbar pedicle screw placement is commonly done, but the percutaneous nature of this makes posterior arthrodesis extremely difficult. Many times, surgeons will simply forego posterior arthrodesis, place posterior pedicle screws, and rely only on the interbody area for arthrodesis. We describe our technique of adding facet arthrodesis via the same corridor through which the pedicle screw is inserted with minimal addition of time or steps. METHODS: We demonstrate our technique of how we use navigation and tubular retractors to perform posterior facet arthrodesis during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. We illustrate this technique with a case of a patient with scoliosis, intraoperative photos, and an illustrative video. We also show an intraoperative computed tomography image to help visualize the arthrodesis surfaces. With this technique, we show how there are a few additional steps that are not very time consuming to add posterior arthrodesis. RESULTS: MIS facet fusion can be performed in a relatively straightforward manner during percutaneous pedicle fixation without significant addition of intraoperative time or steps. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to add posterior arthrodesis to percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw fusion with few added steps and minimal addition of time using navigation and MIS tubular retractors.

Intradural osteogenic sarcoma in the lumbar spine.

To our knowledge, this is the third reported case of spinal intradural osteogenic sarcoma. The two prior reported cases had a history of iophendylate injection whereas this patient did not. Other cases involved the cranial meninges, not the spine. This is the first reported case of intradural osteosarcoma in the absence of iophendylate injection. We report our workup, diagnosis, and treatment. We also include a video demonstrating the intraoperative invasion of tumor and dural erosion.