Wastewater-Based Surveillance Does Not Belong in a Regulatory Framework Designed to Protect Waters That Receive Treated Wastewater. Comment on Wright, T.; Adhikari, A. Utilizing a National Wastewater Monitoring Program to Address the U.S. Opioid Epidemic: A Focus on Metro Atlanta, Georgia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5282.

We read with great interest the work by Wright and Adhikari on "Utilizing a National Wastewater Monitoring Program to Address the U.S. Opioid Epidemic: A Focus on Metro Atlanta, Georgia" [...].

How much data is required for a robust and reliable wastewater characterization?

Water resource recovery facility (WRRF) modeling requires robust and reliable characterization of the wastewater to be treated. Poor characterization can lead to unreliable model predictions, which can have significant economic consequences when models are used to make important facility upgrade/expansion and operational decisions. Current wastewater characterization practice often involves a limited number of relatively short-duration intensive campaigns. On-going work at the Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) WRRF, serving 3.1 million residents in Southeast Michigan, provided an opportunity to conduct more detailed wastewater characterization over an annual cycle. The collection system includes a significant combined sewer component, and the WRRF provides primary and secondary treatment (high purity oxygen activated sludge) and phosphorus removal via ferric chloride addition. Detailed wastewater fractionation was conducted weekly over a one-year period. Daily conventional secondary influent and process operational data from that same period were used to evaluate the efficiency of various wastewater characterization strategies on the bioreactor mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) concentration calculated using an International Water Association (IWA) Activated Sludge Model Number 1 (ASM1) with minor modifications. An adaptive strategy consisting of a series of short-duration characterization campaigns, used to assess model fit for its intended purpose and continued until a robust and reliable model result, is recommended. Periods of unusual plant influent and/or operational conditions should be identified, and data from these periods potentially excluded from the analysis. Sufficient data should also be collected to identify periods when poor model structure, rather than wastewater characterization, leads to poor fit of the model to actual data.

Decrease in net mercury methylation rates following iron amendment to anoxic wetland sediment slurries.

The rate of mercury methylation in anoxic wetland sediments is affected by the concentration of bioavailable complexes between Hg and sulfide. Previous research with pure bacterial cultures has shown that addition of ferrous iron reduces the net rate of mercury methylation by decreasing the concentration of dissolved sulfide. To assess the possibility of using this approach to decrease net mercury methylation in restored and constructed wetlands, laboratory experiments were conducted by adding Hg(II) and Fe(II) to sediments collected from six sites in five estuarine wetlands. Addition of 30 mM (0.07 mmol g(-1) or 3.9 mg g(-1)) Fe(II) decreased net mercury methylation relative to that of unamended controls by a factor of 2.1-6.6. In all cases, the observed decrease in net mercury methylation was accompanied by a decrease in the concentrations of sulfide and filterable mercury in the water overlying the sediments. When iron was added to one of the sediment samples at doses that were small relative to the concentration of sulfide present, net mercury methylation either increased slightly or was unaffected. Comparison of the results to speciation model predictions suggests that dissolved reduced sulfur-containing species play a role in the formation of uncharged, bioavailable Hg complexes. Although further research is needed to determine the long-term effect of iron amendment, these results suggest that iron addition decreases mercury methylation in authentic wetland sediments.

Reduction of net mercury methylation by iron in Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3) cultures: implications for engineered wetlands.

Although one potential drawback of wetland construction and restoration is the formation of monomethylmercury, it may be possible to decrease net mercury methylation with the use of an appropriate sediment amendment. Using pure cultures of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3), we tested the hypothesis that adding ferrous iron to sulfidic wetland sediments decreases mercury solubility and bioavailability and, therefore, net methylation. In sediment-free cultures, net mercury methylation decreased with increasing [Fe(II)]. After 72 h of incubation, more than four times as much net methylmercury formed in the lowest ([Fe(II)] = 10(-6) M) treatment (180 +/- 33 pM) as compared with the highest ([Fe(II)] = 10(-2) M) treatment (42 +/- 14 pM). In cultures containing a model wetland sediment, more than three times as much methylmercury was observed in 10(-6) M Fe(II) treatments (1,010 +/- 95 pM) as compared with treatments amended with 10(-2) M Fe(II) (300 +/- 46 pM). Initial filterable mercury measurements and chemical equilibrium speciation predictions suggest that the lower net methylmercury production in the high-iron treatments was due to a decrease in sulfide activity and a concomitant decrease in the concentration of dissolved mercury. Although iron amendments could potentially minimize net mercury methylation in engineered wetland sediments, further research under field conditions is required to assess the efficacy of this approach.