Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 61(6): 372-7, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24640201

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the utility of anti-nucleosome antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies in diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and as a marker of disease activity. METHODS: This is a hospital based observational study among 40 (37 females and 3 males) selected cases of SLE (> or = 4 ACR criteria) and 80 control. 40 cases of other systemic autoimmune disease (SAD) [e g. 29 cases of Rheumatoid arthritis, 4 cases of Systemic sclerosis/scleroderma, 4 cases of Sjögren syndrome, 3 cases of MCTD and 40 Healthy blood were taken as control. From each patient venous blood samples were collected and submitted for anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies assay by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Anti-nucleosome antibodies were positive in 19 (47.5%) SLE, 02 (05%) other SAD and none of the healthy persons. Anti dsDNA antibodies were positive in 15 (37.5%) SLE patients, 07 (17.5%) other SAD and 01(2.5%) healthy persons. For diagnosis of SLE, sensitivity of anti-ds DNA and anti-nucleosome antibody was found to be 37.5% and 47.50% respectively. The specificity of anti-nucleosome was 100% and that of anti-dsDNA was 97.50%. So, anti-nucleosome antibody test is more specific and more sensitive for diagnosis of SLE than anti-dsDNA. When SLE cases were compared with SAD, sensitivity of anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome antibody, for diagnosis of SLE, found to be 37.50% and 47.50% respectively but the specificity of anti-nucleosome was 95% and that of anti-dsDNA was 82.50%. Both antibodies show positive correlation with SLEDAI score .The correlation coefficient was stronger for anti-dsDNA antibodies (r = +0.550, P = < .001) than anti-nucleosome antibodies (r = +0.332, P = < .05) CONCLUSIONS: Anti-nucleosome antibodies show higher positivity than anti-dsDNA antibodies among SLE than other SAD and healthy population. Anti-nucleosome antibodies are more sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of SLE than anti-dsDNA antibodies. Anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA both show positive correlation with SLEDAI. But anti-dsDNA antibodies show stronger correlation with SLEDAI than anti-nucleosome. So, anti-nucleosome antibodies can be used as an additional marker for diagnosis of SLE and SLE disease activity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , Child , DNA/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/blood , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Nucleosomes/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...