Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 107(4): 359-363, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34544689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Diazoxide (DZX) is the drug of choice for treating hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia (HH), and it has potentially serious adverse effects. We studied the safety and efficacy of low-dose DZX in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants with HH. DESIGN: An observational cohort study from 1 September 2014 to 31 September 2020. SETTING: A tertiary Women's and Children's Hospital in Singapore. PATIENTS: All SGA infants with HH. INTERVENTION: Diazoxide, at 3-5 mg/kg/day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term outcomes; adverse drug events and fasting studies to determine 'safe to go home' and 'resolution' of HH. RESULTS: Among 71 836 live births, 11 493 (16%) were SGA. Fifty-six (0.5%) SGA infants with HH were identified, of which 27 (47%) with a mean gestational age of 36.4±2 weeks and birth weight of 1942±356 g required DZX treatment. Diazoxide was initiated at 3 mg/kg/day at a median age of 10 days. The mean effective dose was 4.6±2.2 mg/kg/day, with 24/27 (89%) receiving 3-5 mg/kg/day. Generalised hypertrichosis occurred in 2 (7.4%) and fluid retention in 1 (3.7%) infant. A fasting study was performed before home while on DZX in 26/27 (96%) cases. Diazoxide was discontinued at a median age of 63 days (9-198 days), and resolution of HH was confirmed in 26/27 (96%) infants on passing a fasting study. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that low-dose DZX effectively treats SGA infants with HH as measured by fasting studies. Although the safety profile was excellent, minimal adverse events were still observed with DZX, even at low doses.


Subject(s)
Congenital Hyperinsulinism , Diazoxide , Child , Congenital Hyperinsulinism/chemically induced , Congenital Hyperinsulinism/drug therapy , Diazoxide/adverse effects , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age
2.
JMIR Pediatr Parent ; 4(4): e30169, 2021 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34544679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Parents commonly experience anxiety, worry, and psychological distress in caring for newborn infants, particularly those born preterm. Web-based therapist services may offer greater accessibility and timely psychological support for parents but are nevertheless labor intensive due to their interactive nature. Chatbots that simulate humanlike conversations show promise for such interactive applications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the usability and feasibility of chatbot technology for gathering real-life conversation data on stress, sleep, and infant feeding from parents with newborn infants and to investigate differences between the experiences of parents with preterm and term infants. METHODS: Parents aged ≥21 years with infants aged ≤6 months were enrolled from November 2018 to March 2019. Three chatbot scripts (stress, sleep, feeding) were developed to capture conversations with parents via their mobile devices. Parents completed a chatbot usability questionnaire upon study completion. Responses to closed-ended questions and manually coded open-ended responses were summarized descriptively. Open-ended responses were analyzed using the latent Dirichlet allocation method to uncover semantic topics. RESULTS: Of 45 enrolled participants (20 preterm, 25 term), 26 completed the study. Parents rated the chatbot as "easy" to use (mean 4.08, SD 0.74; 1=very difficult, 5=very easy) and were "satisfied" (mean 3.81, SD 0.90; 1=very dissatisfied, 5 very satisfied). Of 45 enrolled parents, those with preterm infants reported emotional stress more frequently than did parents of term infants (33 vs 24 occasions). Parents generally reported satisfactory sleep quality. The preterm group reported feeding problems more frequently than did the term group (8 vs 2 occasions). In stress domain conversations, topics linked to "discomfort" and "tiredness" were more prevalent in preterm group conversations, whereas the topic of "positive feelings" occurred more frequently in the term group conversations. Interestingly, feeding-related topics dominated the content of sleep domain conversations, suggesting that frequent or irregular feeding may affect parents' ability to get adequate sleep or rest. CONCLUSIONS: The chatbot was successfully used to collect real-time conversation data on stress, sleep, and infant feeding from a group of 45 parents. In their chatbot conversations, term group parents frequently expressed positive emotions, whereas preterm group parents frequently expressed physical discomfort and tiredness, as well as emotional stress. Overall, parents who completed the study gave positive feedback on their user experience with the chatbot as a tool to express their thoughts and concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03630679; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03630679.

3.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21259741

ABSTRACT

IntroductionVaccination is critical in controlling the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, vaccine perception and acceptance among pregnant and lactating women is unknown in Singapore. We aimed to determine the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among these two groups of women in Singapore, and factors associated with vaccine acceptance. MethodsWe conducted an anonymous, online survey on the perception and acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant and lactating women at a tertiary hospital in Singapore from 1st March to 31st May 2021. Information on demographics and knowledge were collected, and these factors were assessed for their relationship with vaccine acceptance. ResultsA total of 201 pregnant and 207 lactating women participated. Vaccine acceptance rates in pregnant and lactating women were 30.3% and 16.9% respectively. Pregnant women who were unsure or unwilling to take the vaccine cited concerns about safety of the vaccine during pregnancy (92.9%), while lactating women were concerned about potential long-term negative effects on the breastfeeding child (75.6%). Other factors significantly associated with vaccine acceptance included a lower monthly household income or education level, appropriate knowledge regarding vaccine mechanism and higher perceived maternal risk of COVID-19. Most pregnant (70.0%) and lactating women (83.7%) were willing to take the vaccine only when more safety data during pregnancy and breastfeeding were available. ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccine acceptance was low among pregnant and lactating women in Singapore. Addressing safety concerns when more data is available and education on mechanism of vaccine action will likely improve acceptance among these women.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...