Boosting self-efficacy and improving practices for smoking prevention and cessation among South American cancer care providers with a web-based algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Digital technologies have positively impacted the availability and usability of clinical algorithms through the advancement in mobile health. Therefore, this study aimed to determine if a web-based algorithm designed to support the decision-making process of cancer care providers (CCPs) differentially impacted their self-reported self-efficacy and practices for providing smoking prevention and cessation services in Peru and Colombia. METHODS: A simple decision-making tree algorithm was built in REDCap using information from an extensive review of the currently available smoking prevention and cessation resources. We employed a pre-post study design with a mixed-methods approach among 53 CCPs in Peru and Colombia for pilot-testing the web-based algorithm during a 3-month period. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the CCPs' self-efficacy and practices before and after using the web-based algorithm. The usability of the web-based algorithm was quantitatively measured with the system usability scale (SUS), as well as qualitatively through the analysis of four focus groups conducted among the participating CCPs. RESULTS: The pre-post assessments indicated that the CCPs significantly improved their self-efficacy and practices toward smoking prevention and cessation services after using the web-based algorithm. The overall average SUS score obtained among study participants was 82.9 (± 9.33) [Peru 81.5; Colombia 84.1]. After completing the qualitative analysis of the focus groups transcripts, four themes emerged: limited resources currently available for smoking prevention and cessation in oncology settings, merits of the web-based algorithm, challenges with the web-based algorithm, and suggestions for improving this web-based decision-making tool. CONCLUSION: The web-based algorithm showed high usability and was well-received by the CCPs in Colombia and Peru, promoting a preliminary improvement in their smoking prevention and cessation self-efficacy and practices.

Results of a novel intervention to increase rates of diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Veterans with primary hyperparathyroidism are under diagnosed and undertreated. We report the results of a pilot study to address this problem. METHODS: We implemented a stakeholder-driven, multi-component intervention to increase rates of diagnosis and treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism at a single VA hospital. Intervention effects were evaluated using an interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of Veterans affected by the intervention was 67 years (SD 12.1) and 84 â€‹% were men. Compared to the pre-intervention period, the intervention doubled the proportion of Veterans who were appropriately evaluated for hyperparathyroidism (absolute difference 25 â€‹%, 95 â€‹% CI 11 â€‹%-38 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and increased referrals for treatment by 27 â€‹% (95 â€‹% CI 7 â€‹%-47 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.012). CONCLUSION: Our pilot study suggests it is feasible to address the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of primary hyperparathyroidism among Veterans.

Defining the Role of Social Vulnerability in Treatment and Survival in Localized Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether variations in Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) are associated with disparities in colon cancer surgery and mortality. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Colon cancer mortality is influenced by health care access, which is affected by individual and community-level factors. Prior studies have not used the SVI to compare surgical access and survival in localized colon cancer patients. Further, it is unclear if those above 65 years are more vulnerable to variations in SVI. METHODS: We queried the Texas and California Cancer Registries from 2004-2017 to identify patients with localized colonic adenocarcinoma and categorized patients into <65 and ≥65 years. Our outcomes were survival and access to surgical intervention. The independent variable was census tract social vulnerability index, with higher scores indicating more social vulnerability. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards for analysis. RESULTS: We included 73,923 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years (SD 13.0), mean SVI of 47.2 (SD 27.6), and 51.1% male. After adjustment, increasing SVI was associated with reduced odds of undergoing surgery (OR 0.996; 95% CI 0.995-0.997; P < 0.0001 and increased mortality (HR 1.002; 95% CI 1.001-1.002; P < 0.0001). Patients < 65 years were more sensitive to variation in SVI. CONCLUSIONS: Increased social vulnerability was associated with reduced odds of receiving surgery for early-stage colon cancer as well as increased mortality. These findings amplify the need for policy changes at the local, state, and federal level to address community-level vulnerability to improve access to surgical care and reduce mortality.

Effect of Hospital Cancer Designation on use of Multimodal Therapy and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A State-Wide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) often requires multidisciplinary approach. However, multimodal treatment options (receipt of > 1 type of treatment) may not be uniformly delivered across health systems. We characterized the association between center-level cancer center designation and receipt of multimodal treatment and survival. METHODS: The Texas Cancer Registry was used to identify patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC from 2004-2017. We identified those who received care at either: a National Cancer Institute-designated (NCI-D), an American College of Surgeons-Commission on Cancer-designated (ACS-D), or an undesignated facility. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression for analysis to assess receipt of one or more treatment modality and 5-year overall survival. RESULTS: Of 19,355 patients with stage IV CRC, 2955 (15%) received care at an NCI-D facility and 5871 (30%) received multimodal therapy. Both NCI-D (odds ratio [OR] 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-1.81) and ACS-D (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.27-1.48) were associated with increased likelihood of multimodal therapy compared with undesignated centers. NCI-D also was associated with significantly improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% CI 0.70-0.78), although ACS-D was associated with a modest improvement in survival (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92-0.99). Receipt of multimodal therapy was strongly associated with improved survival (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.59-0.63). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage IV CRC, treatment at ACS-D and NCI-D facilities was associated with increased use of multimodality therapy and improved survival. However, only a small proportion of patients have access to these specialized centers, highlighting a need for expanded access to multimodal therapies at other centers.

Assessing a Structured Mental Fitness Program for Academic Acute Care Surgeons: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a well-established positive correlation between improved physician wellness and patient care outcomes. Mental fitness is a component of wellness that is understudied in academic medicine. We piloted a structured mental fitness Positive Intelligence (PQ) training program for academic surgeons, hypothesizing this would be associated with improvements in PQ scores, wellness, sleep, and trainee evaluations. METHODS: This is a single-institution, prospective, mixed-methods pilot study. All active Burn/Trauma/Acute & Critical Care Surgical faculty and fellows in our division were offered the PQ program and the option to participate in this research study. The 6-wk program consists of daily exercises on a smartphone application, weekly readings, and small-group meetings with a trained mindfulness coach. Study outcomes included changes in pretraining versus post-training PQ scores, sleep hygiene, wellness, and teaching scores. A Net Promoter Score was calculated to measure user overall experience (range -100 to 100; positive scores being supportive). For secondary analysis, participants were stratified into high versus low user groups by "muscle" scores, which were calculated by program use over time. A postintervention focus group was also held to evaluate perceptions of wellness and experience with the PQ program. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 15 participants who provided consent. The participants were primarily White (73.3%), Assistant Professors (66.7%) with Surgical Critical Care fellowship training (86.7%), and a slight female predominance (53.3%). Comparison of scores pretraining versus post-training demonstrated statistically significant increases in PQ (59 versus 65, P = 0.004), but no significant differences for sleep (24.0 versus 29.0, P = 0.33) or well-being (89.0 versus 94.0, P = 0.10). Additionally, there was no significant difference in teaching evaluations for both residents (9.1 versus 9.3, P = 0.33) and medical students (8.3 versus 8.5, P = 0.77). High versus low user groups were defined by the median muscle score (166 [Interquartile range 95.5-298.5]). High users demonstrated a statistically higher proportion of ongoing usage (75% versus 14%, P < 0.05). The final Net Promoter Score score was 25, which demonstrates program support within this group. Focus group content analysis established eight major categories: current approaches to wellness, preknowledge, reasons for participation, expected gains, program strengths, suggestions for improvement, recommendations for approaches, and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study highlighted certain benefits of a structured mental fitness program for academic acute care surgeons. Our mixed-methods data demonstrate significant improvement in PQ scores, ongoing usage in high user participants, as well as interpersonal benefits such as improved connectedness and creation of a shared language within participants. Future work should evaluate this program on a higher-powered scale, with a focus on intentionality in wellness efforts, increased exposure to mental fitness, and recruitment of trainees and other health-care providers, as well as identifying the potential implications for patient outcomes.

Is nonoperative management of appendicitis safe and effective in multi-morbid patients?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to (1) compare post-treatment outcomes of operative and nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in multi-morbid patients and (2) evaluate the generalizability of prior clinical trials by determining whether outcomes differ in multi-morbid patients compared to the young and healthy patients who resemble prior clinical trial participants. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2017. We included 368,537 patients with acute, uncomplicated appendicitis who were classified as having 0 or 2+ comorbidities. We compared inpatient morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and costs using propensity scores. Unmeasured confounding was addressed with probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 5% of patients without comorbidities were treated nonoperatively versus 20% of multi-morbid patients. Compared to surgery, nonoperative management was associated with a 3.5% decrease in complications (95% confidence interval 3%-4%) for multi-morbid patients, but there was no significant difference for patients without comorbidity. However, nonoperative management was associated with a 1.5% increase in mortality for multimorbid patients (95% confidence interval 1.3%-1.7%). Costs and length of stay were lower for all patients treated with surgery. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that results were robust to the effects of unmeasured confounding. CONCLUSION: Our results raise concerns about the generalizability of clinical trials that compared nonoperative and operative management of appendicitis because (1) those trials enrolled mostly young and healthy patients, and (2) results in multi-morbid patients differ from outcomes in younger and healthier patients.

Association of race, demographic and socioeconomic factors with failure to rescue after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the association of patient-related factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and insurance on failure to rescue (FTR) after hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeries. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we analyzed 98,788 elective HPB surgeries between 2004 and 2017. Major and minor complications were identified using ICD9/10 codes. We evaluated mortality rates and FTR (inpatient mortality after major complications). We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess racial, socioeconomic, and demographic factors on FTR, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 43 % of patients (n = 42,256) had pancreatic operations, 36% (n = 35,526) had liver surgery, and 21% (n = 21,006) had biliary interventions. The overall major complication rate was 21% (n = 20,640), of which 8% (n = 1655) suffered FTR. Factors independently associated with increased risk for FTR were male sex, older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hispanic ethnicity, Asian or other race, lower income quartile, Medicare insurance, and southern region hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare insurance, male gender, Hispanic ethnicity, and lower income quartile were associated with increased risk for FTR. Efforts should be made to improve the identification and subsequent treatment of complications for those at high risk of FTR.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment and Minimally Invasive Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatoduodenectomy: an ACS NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for pancreatic cancer (PC) followed by minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). We evaluate the impact of the surgical approach on 30-day outcomes in PC patients who underwent NAT. METHODS: Patients with PC who had NAT followed by MIPD or open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) were identified from a pancreatectomy-targeted dataset (2014-2020) of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Comparisons were made between MIPD and OPD within NAT groups. RESULTS: A total of 5588 patients were analyzed. Of those, 4907 underwent OPD and 476 underwent MIPD. In addition, 3559 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and 1830 received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. In the chemotherapy-alone group, the MIPD subgroup had lower rates of any complication (38.2% vs. 45.8%, P = 0.005), but there were no differences in mortality (2.1% for MIPD vs 1.9% for OPD, P=0.8) or serious complication (11.8% for MIPD vs 15% for OPD, P=0.1). On multivariable analysis, MIPD was independently predictive of lower rates of any complication (OR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.6-0.93, P = 0.0009), CR-POPF (OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.96, P = 0.04), and shorter LOS (estimate: -1.03, 95% CI -1.73 to -0.32, P = 0.004). In the chemoradiation group, patients undergoing MIPD had higher rates of preoperative diabetes (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in any outcomes between the two approaches in this group. CONCLUSION: MIPD is safe and feasible after NAT. Patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone followed by MIPD had lower rates of complications, shorter LOS, and fewer CR-POPFs compared to OPD.

Reassessing surgical guidelines for papillary thyroid cancer impact on survival: Expanding indications for lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer have not addressed significant threats to valid inference from observational data. The purpose of this study was to compare survival after lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer while addressing bias from unmeasured confounding. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 84,300 patients treated with lobectomy or total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2017. The primary outcome was overall survival evaluated by flexible parametric survival models and inverse probability weighting on the propensity score. Bias from unobserved confounding was assessed using two-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and 2-stage least squares regression. RESULTS: The median age of treated patients was 48 years (interquartile range, 37-59), 78% were women, and 76% were white. We found no statistically significant differences in overall survival or 5- and 10-year survival between patients treated with lobectomy or total thyroidectomy. Additionally, we found no statistically significant difference in survival by subgroups, including tumor size (<4 cm or ≥4 cm), age (<65 or ≥65), or estimated risk of mortality. Sensitivity analyses suggested that an unmeasured confounder would need to have an extremely large effect to change the primary finding. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare lobectomy and total thyroidectomy outcomes while adjusting for and quantifying the potential effects of unmeasured confounding variables on observational data. The findings suggest that total thyroidectomy is unlikely to offer a survival advantage over lobectomy regardless of tumor size, patient age, or overall risk of death.

Implications of the interaction between travel burden and area deprivation for patients with pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Fragmentation of care and distance traveled are classically surrogates for poor access to care, but little is known about how social determinants of health interact with travel burden to affect survival for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). We sought to characterize the individual and composite impact of these factors. METHODS: 20769 patients treated for PC between 2005 and 2019 in the Texas Cancer Registry were included. The Area Deprivation Index and Poverty Index were used to quantify social determinants of health. Survival analyses were performed at 2 years as well as subgroup analysis on patients with the greatest travel burden. RESULTS: Improved survival was associated with FC (HR 0.74, CI 0.71-0.77) and distance from an accredited cancer center (Quartile 4 HR 0.90, CI 0.81-1.00). High ADI led to worse outcomes while low ADI led to improved outcomes with increasing travel burden. CONCLUSIONS: This data shows a complex relationship between travel burden and survival for patients with pancreatic cancer where stratifying by area deprivation reveals divergent outcomes and the potential to exacerbate disparities.

Defining the Duty Hour for Surgical Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: Being mindful of duty hours has become an integral part of surgical training. Violations can lead to disciplinary action by the American Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), including probation or even withdrawal of accreditation. It is therefore crucial to ensure these hours are accurately reported. However, as these are often self-reported by the resident, what counts as a duty hour is at the discretion of the reporter. The goal of this study is to identify what trainees and faculty include in their definitions of a duty hour. We hypothesized that there would be discrepancies in faculty versus trainee definitions of the duty hour, and that there remains an unclear understanding of which nonclinical activities contribute to surgical trainee duty hours. DESIGN: An anonymous, voluntary survey was conducted at a single institution. The survey contained 14 scenarios, and participants answered either "yes" or "no" as to if they believed the scenario should be counted within duty hour reporting. Analysis of the results included evaluating overall responses to determine which scenarios were more controversial, as well as chi square analysis comparing trainee (residents and fellows) versus faculty responses to each scenario. SETTING: This survey was performed within the Department of Surgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, a large academic institution in Dallas, TX. PARTICIPANTS: There were 91 total faculty and trainee responses to the voluntary survey within the General Surgery Department and associated subspecialties, including 50 residents (54.9%), 4 clinical fellows (4.4%) and 37 faculty (40.7%). RESULTS: When analyzing total responses, the most controversial scenarios were taking a short period of home call (50.6% of all respondents included this as a duty hour), making a presentation for resident education (48.4%), making a presentation related to patient care (57.1%), and making a monthly call schedule (44.0%). The least controversial topic was transit to and from work (91.2% of all respondents did not include this as a duty hour). Additionally, there were statistically significant differences between trainee and faculty perceptions when it came to attending departmental curricula (96.2% trainees included as a duty hour v 81.6% faculty, p =0.02), participating in nonmandatory journal club (5.7% trainees v 23.7% faculty, p =0.01), and attending mentorship meetings (30.2% trainees v 52.6% faculty, p =0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus as to what nonclinical activities formally count towards a duty hour. There are also significant differences identified between faculty and trainee definitions, which could have implications for duty hour reporting and ACGME violations. Further research is required to obtain a clearer picture of the surgical opinion on defining the duty hour, and hopefully this will reduce duty hour violations and better optimize surgical trainee education.

Burnout in Surgical Residents of Underrepresented in Medicine Backgrounds: Key Influencing Factors and Possible Solutions.

INTRODUCTION: Alarming rates of burnout in surgical training pose a concern due to its deleterious effects on both patients and providers. Datum remains lacking on rates of burnout in surgical residents based on race and ethnicity. This study aims to document the frequency of burnout in surgical residents of racially underrepresented backgrounds and elucidate contributing factors. METHODS: A 35-question anonymized survey was distributed to general surgery residents from 23 programs between August 2018 and May 2019. This survey was designed from the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory, and included additional questions assessing participant demographics, educational, and social backgrounds. Responses were analyzed utilizing chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. There was also a free response portion of the survey which was evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We received 243 responses from 23 general surgery programs yielding a 9% (23/246) program response rate and 26% (243/935) response rate by surgical residents. One hundred and eighty-five participants (76%) identified as nonunderrepresented in medicine and 58 (24%) of participants identified as underrepresented in medicine. Fifty-three percent were male and 47% female. Overall, sixty-six percent of all surgical residents (n = 161) endorsed burnout with racially underrepresented residents reporting higher rates of burnout at 76% compared to 63% in their nonunderrepresented counterparts (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Although the generalizability of these results is limited, higher rates of reported burnout in racially underrepresented trainees noted in our study illuminates the need for continual dialogue on potential influencing factors and mitigation strategies.

Factors associated with failure to operate and its impact on survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Curative intent for localized pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) requires surgery, but despite improved perioperative outcomes, surgery remains underutilized. This study analyzed the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) to identify resectable PDAC patients who underwent curative-intent surgery in Texas between 2004 and 2018. We then evaluated demographic and clinical factors associated with failure to operate and survival (OS). METHODS: We identified patients with localized PDAC or regional lymph node spread between 2004 and 2018 in the TCR. Resection rates were determined and multivariable regression and cox proportional hazards were used to identify factors associated with failure to OS. RESULTS: Of 4274 patients, 22% underwent resection, 57% were not offered surgery, 6% had comorbidities precluding surgery, and 3% refused. Resection rates decreased from 31% in 2004 to 22% in 2018. Increasing age was associated with failure to operate (odds ratio [OR] 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-3.61; p < 0.0001) while treatment at a Commission on Cancer (CoC) center correlated with reduced failure to operate (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.78; p < 0.0001). Resection correlated with survival (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.31-0.38; p < 0.0001) as did treatment at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated center (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is underutilized for the treatment of resectable PDAC in Texas with decreasing utilization, annually. Evaluation at CoC was associated with improved resection rates and NCI was associated with increased survival. Expanding access to multidisciplinary care including trained hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgeons may improve outcomes for PDAC patients.

Outcomes of Nonoperative vs Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Older Adults in the US.

Importance: Although the incidence of acute appendicitis among adults 65 years and older is high, these patients are underrepresented in randomized clinical trials comparing nonoperative vs operative management of appendicitis; it is unclear whether current trial data can be used to guide treatment in older adults. Objective: To compare outcomes following nonoperative vs operative management of appendicitis in older adults and assess whether they differ from results in younger patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used US hospital admissions data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2017. Of 723 889 adult patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, 474 845 with known procedure date who survived 24 hours postprocedure and did not have inflammatory bowel disease were included (43 846 who were treated nonoperatively and 430 999 with appendectomy) were included. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to April 2022. Exposures: Nonoperative vs operative management. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was incidence of posttreatment complications. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay, and inpatient costs. Differences were estimated using inverse probability weighting of the propensity score with sensitivity analysis to quantify effects of unmeasured confounding. Results: The median (IQR) age in the overall cohort was 39 (27-54) years, and 29 948 participants (51.3%) were female. In patients 65 years and older, nonoperative management was associated with a 3.72% decrease in risk of complications (95% CI, 2.99-4.46) and a 1.82% increase in mortality (95% CI, 1.49-2.15) along with increased length of hospitalization and costs. Outcomes in patients younger than 65 years were significantly different than in older adults, with only minor differences between nonoperative and operative management with respect to morbidity and mortality, and smaller differences in length of hospitalization and costs. Morbidity and mortality results were somewhat sensitive to bias from unmeasured confounding. Conclusions and Relevance: Nonoperative management was associated with reduced complications in older but not younger patients; however, operative management was associated with reduced mortality, hospital length of stay, and overall costs across all age groups. The different outcomes of nonoperative vs operative management of appendicitis in older and younger adults highlights the need for a randomized clinical trial to determine the best approach for managing appendicitis in older patients.

Defining the Price Tag of Complications Following Pancreatic Surgery: A US National Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic surgery tends to have a high rate of postoperative complications due to its complex nature, significantly increasing hospital costs. Our aim was to describe the true association between complications and hospital costs in a national cohort of US patients. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was used to conduct a retrospective analysis of elective pancreatic resections performed between 2004 and 2017, categorizing them based on whether patients experienced major complications (MaC), minor complications (MiC), or no complications (NC). Multivariable quantile regression was used to analyze how costs varied at different percentiles of the cost curve. RESULTS: Of 37,893 patients, 45.3%, 28.6%, and 26.1% experienced NC, MiC, and MaC, respectively. Factors associated with MaC were a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥4, prolonged length of stay, proximal pancreatectomy, older age, male sex, and surgery performed at hospitals with a small number of beds or at urban nonteaching hospitals (all P < 0.01). Multivariable quantile regression revealed significant variation in MiC and MaC across the cost curve. At the 50th percentile, MiC increased the cost by $3352 compared to NC while MaC almost doubled the cost of the surgery, increasing it by $20,215 (both P < 0.01). The association between complications and cost was even greater at the 95th percentile, increasing the cost by $10,162 and $108,793 for MiC and MaC, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MiC and MaC were significantly associated with increased hospital costs. Furthermore, the relationship between MaC and costs was especially apparent at higher percentiles of the cost curve.

Hospital Designations and Their Impact on Guideline-Concordant Care and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Do They Matter?

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) requires complex multidisciplinary care. European evidence suggests potential benefit from regionalization, however, data characterizing the ideal setting in the United States are sparse. Our study compares the significance of four hospital designations on guideline-concordant care (GCC) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Texas Cancer Registry was queried for 17,071 patients with PDAC treated between 2004 and 2015. Clinical data were correlated with hospital designations: NCI designated (NCI), high volume (HV), safety net (SNH), and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accredited (ACS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression were used to assess associations with GCC [on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations]. Cox regression analysis assessed survival. RESULTS: Only 43% of patients received GCC. NCI had the largest associated risk reduction (HR 0.61, CI 0.58-0.65), followed by HV (HR 0.87, CI 0.83-0.90) and ACS (HR 0.91, CI 0.87-0.95). GCC was associated with a survival benefit in the full (HR 0.75, CI 0.69-0.81) and resected cohort (HR 0.74, CI 0.68-0.80). NCI (OR 1.52, CI 1.37-1.70), HV (OR 1.14, CI 1.05-1.23), and SNH (OR 0.78, CI 0.68-0.91) all correlated with receipt of GCC. For resected patients, ACS (OR 0.63, CI 0.50-0.79) and SNH (OR 0.50, CI 0.33-0.75) correlate with GCC. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 43% of patients received GCC. Treatment at NCI and HV correlated with improved GCC and survival. Including GCC as a metric in accreditation standards could impact survival for patients with PDAC.

Hospital Performance on Failure to Rescue Correlates With Likelihood of Home Discharge.

INTRODUCTION: Failure to rescue (FTR) (avoiding death after complications) has been proposed as a measure of hospital quality. Although surviving complications is important, not all rescues are created equal. Patients also place considerable values on being able to return home after surgery and resume their normal lives. From a systems standpoint, nonhome discharge to skilled nursing and other facilities is the biggest driver of Medicare costs. We wanted to determine whether hospitals' ability to keep patients alive after complications was associated with higher rates of home discharge. We hypothesized that hospitals with higher rescue rates would also be more likely to discharge patients home after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the nationwide inpatient sample. We included 1,358,041 patients ≥18 y old who had elective major surgery (general, vascular, orthopedic) at 3818 hospitals from 2013 to 2017. We predicted the correlation between a hospital's performance (rank) on FTR and its rank in terms of home discharge rate. RESULTS: The cohort had a median age of 66 y (interquartile range [IQR] 58-73), and 77.9% of patients were Caucasian. Most patients (63.6%) were treated at urban teaching institutions. The surgical case mix included patients having colorectal (146,993 patients; 10.8%), pulmonary (52,334; 3.9%), pancreatic (13,635; 1.0%), hepatic (14,821; 1.1%), gastric (9182; 0.7%), esophageal (4494; 0.3%), peripheral vascular bypass (29,196; 2.2%), abdominal aneurysm repair (14,327; 1.1%), coronary artery bypass (61,976; 4.6%), hip replacement (356,400; 26.2%), and knee replacement (654,857; 48.2%) operations. The overall mortality was 0.3%, the average hospital complication rate was 15.9%, the median hospital rescue rate was 99% (IQR 70%-100%), and the median hospital rate of home discharge was 80% (IQR 74%-85%).There was a small but positive correlation between hospitals' performance on the FTR metric and the likelihood of home discharge after surgery (r = 0.0453; P = 0.006). When considering hospital rates of discharge to home following a postoperative complication, there was a similar correlation between rescue rates and probability of home discharge (r = 0.0963; P < 0.001). However, on sensitivity analysis excluding orthopedic surgery, there was a stronger correlation between rescue rates and home discharge rate (r = 0.4047, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a small correlation between a hospital's ability to rescue patients from complication and that hospital's likelihood of discharging patients home after surgery. When excluding orthopedic operations from the analysis, this correlation strengthened. Our findings suggest that efforts to reduce mortality after complications will likely also help patients return home more frequently after complex surgery. However, more work needs to be done to identify successful programs and other patient and hospital factors that affect both rescue and home discharge.