ICONS: Managing Care and Costs: The Sustained Cost Impact of Reduced Hospitalizations in a Partnership-Measurement Model of Disease Management.

Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS) was a multidisciplinary-partnership, measurement-driven disease management project designed to improve the care and outcomes of patients with acute and chronic heart diseases in Nova Scotia. Previous analyses demonstrated beneficial clinical and macroeconomic end points at the population and system levels, including heightened awareness of the value of team care, increased use of proven therapies, decreased re-hospitalizations and a positive dollar return on investment for the economies of Nova Scotia and Canada. This article analyzes the additional cost-reduction benefits resulting from the reduced re-hospitalizations that occurred among patient populations with heart attacks and heart failure. Over the five-year course of ICONS, one-year readmissions and readmission rates fell continuously for both index disease states. Despite a general inflationary rise in real hospital costs, the per-event cost of readmissions expressed in constant 2002 dollars also decreased: from $10,377 in 1997 to $9,022 in 2002 for the heart attack patient population; and from $9,020 to $8,697 for patients with heart failure. Total real yearly costs for heart attack readmissions fell from $7.4 million in 1997 to $6.4 million in 2002, a 14% decrease; for heart failure, yearly costs decreased by 26%, from $9.2 million to $6.8 million. These microeconomic data supplement the previously reported improvements in patient care and the positive macroeconomic impact of ICONS. Overall, ICONS demonstrated that quality and cost of healthcare could be simultaneously and successfully managed over a sustained period of time for whole patient populations in a real-world setting. ICONS offers strong evidence of the value of the partnership-measurement model of disease management and prevention as a reproducible and desirable template for next-generation healthcare in Canada.

Prescriptions for vitamin D among patients taking antiresorptive agents in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Data on the rate of concomitant vitamin D use with antiresorptive medications are limited. Such information is important because vitamin D is indicated in patients with osteoporosis, including those receiving bisphosphonates, and there is evidence of inadequate use by these patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine prescription vitamin D utilization patterns. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients aged > or = 65 years was conducted in a Canadian pharmacy-insurance organization (RAMQ) who received at least one prescription for an antiresorptive agent (i.e., alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene) from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2003, and did not switch to any other agent during the 1-year post period. Data on prescriptions of vitamin D formulations on the RAMQ formulary (e.g., alfacalcidol, calcitriol, cholecalciferol, doxercalciferol, ergocalciferol) were also captured. No data on generic or over-the-counter vitamin D preparations were available. A vitamin D and antiresorptive agent possession ratio (R(P)) was computed as: R(P) = SigmaD(SPVD) / SigmaD(SARR) where SigmaD(SPVD) = the sum of the days of supply with prescription vitamin D and SigmaD(SARR) = the sum of days of supply with alendronate, risedronate, or raloxifene A vitamin D and antiresorptive agent overlap ratio (R(0)) was computed as: R(0) = SigmaD(SPVDOARR) / SigmaD(SARR) where SigmaD(SPVDOARR) = the sum of days of supply of prescription vitamin D overlapping with alendronate, risedronate, or raloxifene, and SigmaD(SARR) = the sum of the days of supply with alendronate, risedronate, or raloxifene. RESULTS: A total of 46,226 antiresorptive treatment users were identified, > 90% of whom were women. A total of 17,151 (37.1%) had concomitant vitamin D prescriptions. The average duration of prescription therapy with alendronate, risedronate, or raloxifene was 247 days; and the mean duration of prescription vitamin D therapy was 83 days. Patients had a supply of vitamin D for 55% of days of antiresorptive agents therapy (R(P) = 0.55) and a vitamin D supply overlapping with 24% of their days on antiresorptive agents (R(o) = 0.24). Possession and overlap ratios were significantly higher in patients receiving once-weekly bisphosphonate prescriptions compared with once-daily regimens (bisphosphonates or raloxifene). Vitamin D prescriptions were also significantly more likely in patients receiving prescriptions for once-weekly bisphosphonates (odds ratio (OR) = 4.65; 95% CI = 4.29-5.05; p < 0.0001) and once-daily bisphosphonates (OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.76-2.07; p < 0.0001) compared with once-daily raloxifene. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the benefits of vitamin D for osteoporosis, most patients ( approximately 63%) receiving prescriptions for antiresorptive agents were not taking vitamin D, indicating a substantial treatment gap. The study is limited by including data only on (1) pharmacy claims, which do not equate to patient behaviors, such as filling or refilling prescriptions and/or taking the medications; and (2) prescription (but not generic or over-the-counter) vitamin D formulations.

The economic impact of a partnership-measurement model of disease management: Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS).

Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS) was a five-year, community partnership-based disease-management project that sought, as a primary goal, to improve the care and outcomes of patients with heart disease in Nova Scotia. This program, based on a broad stakeholder partnership, provided repeated measurement and feedback on practices and outcomes as well as widespread communication and education among all partners. From a clinical viewpoint, ICONS was successful. For example, use of proven therapies for the target diseases improved and re-hospitalization rates decreased. Stakeholders also perceived a sense of satisfaction because of their involvement in the partnership. However, the universe of health stakeholders is large, and not many have had an experience similar to ICONS. These other health stakeholders, such as decision-makers concerned with the cost of care and determining the value for cost, might, nonetheless, benefit from knowledge of the ICONS concepts and results, particularly economic analyses, as they determine future health policy. Using budgetary data on actual dollars spent and a robust input-output methodology, we assessed the economic impact of ICONS, including trickle-down effects on the Canadian and Nova Scotian economies. The analysis revealed that the $6.22 million invested in Nova Scotia by the private sector donor generated an initial net increase in total Canadian wealth of $5.32 million and a global net increase in total Canadian wealth of $10.23 million, including $2.27 million returned to the different governments through direct and indirect taxes. Thus, the local, provincial and federal governments are important beneficiaries of health project investments such as ICONS. The various government levels benefit from the direct influx of private funds into the publicly funded healthcare sector, from direct and indirect tax revenues and from an increase in knowledge-related employment. This, of course, is in addition to the clinical benefits associated with the partnership-measurement disease-management model. Because of their uniquely simultaneous roles as beneficiary and major resource provider, the public payer can play an early and active role in such partnerships to enhance its efficiencies and increase the likelihood of sustainability if the original concepts are proven of value.

Economic impact of the reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure treated with enalapril.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of heart failure (HF) is linked to embolic stroke and exacerbation of HF. The rate of new-onset AF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and mild to moderate HF enrolled in the SoLVD trials was significantly lower with enalapril than with placebo (5.4% vs 24% over 2.9 years, P < .0001). The objective of this study was to predict economic benefits over 5 and 10 years of reduced AF incidence in patients receiving enalapril for the treatment of HF from a Canadian third-party payer perspective. METHODS: Consequences of reduced incidence of AF in enalapril-treated patients were modeled using a Markov model. Patients were assigned to 1 health state: no AF, AF, poststroke, or death, and moved from one state to the other according to published incidence rates. It was assumed that most patients with AF would receive warfarin for stroke prevention. Resource use and costs were mostly retrieved from published Canadian studies. RESULTS: Reduced incidence of AF resulted in savings of 382 dollars and 525 dollars per patient treated with enalapril over 5 and 10 years, respectively, which stemmed mainly from reduced AF hospitalization and less need for warfarin and amiodarone. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that enalapril becomes more cost saving as the baseline risk for embolic stroke in patients with AF increases and the use of warfarin prophylaxis decreases. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced incidence of AF with enalapril leads to significant clinical and economic advantages on top of the already well-established benefits of enalapril for patients with HF.

Public and private pharmaceutical spending as determinants of health outcomes in Canada.

Canadian per capita drug expenditures increased markedly in recent years and have become center stage in the debate on health care cost containment. To inform public policy, these costs must be compared with the benefits provided by these drugs. This paper measures the statistical relationship between drug spending in Canadian provinces and overall health outcomes. The analysis relies on more homogenous data and includes a more complete set of controls for confounding factors than previous studies. Results show a strong statistical relationship between drug spending and health outcomes, especially for infant mortality and life expectancy at 65. This relationship is almost always stronger for private drug spending than for public drug spending. The analysis further indicates that substantially better health outcomes are observed in provinces where higher drug spending occurs. Simulations show that if all provinces increased per capita drug spending to the levels observed in the two provinces with the highest spending level, an average of 584 fewer infant deaths per year and over 6 months of increased life expectancy at birth would result.