Daclatasvir and Sofosbuvir With or Without Ribavirin in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with direct-acting antiviral drugs in interferon-free regimens is currently recommended for viral hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. There are limited data regarding its results in this population, and no optimal treatment scheme has yet been singled out. METHODS: We report our real-world results in liver transplant (LT) recipients. All patients were hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfected and completed a 12-week treatment course, followed 12 weeks later by HCV polymerase chain reaction testing with 12 IU/mL sensibility. Liver fibrosis was graded with the use of biopsies taken <12 months before treatment and stratified as early (0-1) or moderate to advanced (2-4) according to the Metavir score. RESULTS: Median postoperative time was 5.2 years. Genotype 3 was found in 66.7% of the sample. The following regimens were prescribed: daclatasvir-sofosbuvir with (n = 11) or without (n = 28) ribavirin. Genotypes 1 and 3 were evenly distributed between the regimens. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was obtained in 24 out of 28 patients (85.7%) who received daclatasvir-sofosbuvir and in all patients (100%) who received daclatasvir-sofosbuvir-ribavirin (global SVR 89.7%). All patients that failed treatment had genotype 3 HCV. Fibrosis was evaluated in 79.5% of the sample: 48.4% had early and 51.6% had moderate to advanced fibrosis, for which ribavirin was more commonly prescribed (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The SVR rate in our LT recipients was similar to that previously reported in the literature. The addition of ribavirin to DAA treatment appears to be justified in this population.

Comparison Between IGL-1 and HTK Preservation Solutions in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.

The effectiveness of liver preservation solutions remains in evidence. Cold ischemia time, steatosis, expanded criterion donors, operational cost, and survival represent important roles in its success. In a prospective cohort study between August 2009 and April 2014, 178 patients were allocated into an Institut Georges Lopez - 1 (IGL-1) solution group (63.5%) or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) group (36.5%). There were no differences among recipient's characteristics including age, skin color, gender, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, acute rejection, cholestasis, and reperfusion syndrome incidences. Also, donors, age average, skin color, donor risk index, time in intensive care unit, hemodynamic variables, infections, and steatosis incidences were similar. The average cold ischemia time was 494 minutes in the IGL-1 group and 489 minutes in the HTK group (P = .77). Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase serum levels on the first postoperative day were 707 and 1185 mg/dL, respectively, with IGL-1 and 1298 and 2291 mg/dL, respectively, with HTK (P = .016) and similar at day 15 (P > .88). The incidence of delayed graft function was 4.5% with IGL-1 and 4.6% with HTK (P = .90). The incidence primary nonfunction was 2.7% with IGL-1 and 3.1% with HTK (P = .71). The incidence of perioperative death was 11.5% with IGL-1 and 13.8% with HTK (P = .94). The survival in 30 months was 86% in IGL-1 group and 82% in HTK group (P = .66). Both preservation solutions are efficient to liver transplantations with deceased donors. Major prospective trials are necessary to evaluate each preservation solution's particularities. The preservation solution availability in each transplantation center must guide its use at the present moment.

Randomized clinical assay for hepatic grafts preservation with University of Wisconsin or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solutions in liver transplantation.

University of Wisconsin (UW) solution has been the standard for preservation of liver transplantation grafts since 1989. However, some studies demonstrated that histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution is also effective. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of both solutions in liver transplantation. From January 2003 to August 2004 the livers of deceased donors were randomized into HTK and UW groups. The 102 studied patients included 65 (63.7%) in the UW group and 37 (36.3%) in the HTK group. Sex, race, hemodynamic state, use of adrenergic drugs, and presence of steatosis in the donor were similarly distributed in the two groups (P > .05). The mean age of the donors was 38.1 years (SD +/-14.4) in the UW group and 44.6 years (SD +/-14.2) in the HTK cohort (P = .036). Sex, race, age, etiology of the cirrhosis, retransplant, acute liver failure, portal thrombosis, and Child-Pugh and MELD scores in the recipients were similarly distributed in the two recipient samples (P > .05). Among 89 patients who completed 4 months of follow-up, the HTK group included eight cases (25.8%) of biliary complications versus five cases (8.6%) in the UW group (P = .033; OR = 2.0 95% CI = 1.2-3.5). The incidence of graft dysfunction was 2.8% in the HTK group and 9.4% in the UW group (P = .15). In conclusion, UW and HTK solutions were equally effective for the preservation of the hepatic graft. The routine use of HTK solution can reduce the costs of liver transplantation.

Oxidative stress, hepatocellular integrity, and hepatic function after initial reperfusion in human hepatic transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying liver graft dysfunction are not completely defined, although much of the injury derives from oxidative stress in organ reperfusion. The antioxidant glutathione in its reduced form (GSH) is an important agent to detoxify oxygen species after reperfusion. However, this effect might be limited by low concentrations at the end of cold storage. The objective of this study was to evaluate GSH and glutathione oxidized (GSSG) hepatic levels pre- and postreperfusion and correlate with hepatocellular injury and liver function in the 5 subsequent days after transplantation. METHODS: Liver biopsies were taken immediately before implant and 2 hours after venous reperfusion in 34 grafts, determining GSH, GSSG levels, and GSSG/GSH ratio. Aminotransferases (ALT, AST) and PT were measured for 5 days. RESULTS: There was a strong decrease in GSH concentration (P <.0001), increase of GSSG levels (P <.01), and increase of the GSSG/GSH ratio (P <.0001). No correlations were found between GSH, GSSG, or GSH/GSSH levels and AST, ALT, and PT. CONCLUSION: Glutathione levels showed significant changes after 2 hours of reperfusion, due to intense oxidative stress. Therapies to replenish GSH should be considered as a protective measure to avoid liver graft dysfunction after transplantation.