ABSTRACT
Sex-lethal (Sxl) is the master switch gene for somatic sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. In XX animals, Sxl becomes activated and imposes female development; in X(Y) animals, Sxl remains inactive and male development ensues. A switch gene for sex determination, called F, has also been identified in the housefly, Musca domestica. An active F dictates female development, while male development ensues when F is inactive. To test if the switch functions of Sxl and F are founded on a common molecular basis, we isolated the homologous Sxl gene in the housefly. Though highly conserved in sequence, Musca-Sxl is not sex-specifically regulated: the same transcripts and protein isoforms are expressed in both male and female animals throughout development. Musca-Sxl is apparently not controlled by the primary sex-determining signal and, thus, is unlikely to correspond to the F gene. Ectopic expression of Musca-SXL protein in Drosophila does not exert any noticeable effects on the known target genes of endogenous Sxl. Instead, forced overexpression of the transgene eventually results in lethality of both XY and XX animals and in developmental abnormalities in some escaper XY animals. Similar results were obtained with the Sxl homologue of Ceratitis capitata (Saccone, G., Peluso, I., Artiaco, D. , Giodano, E., Bopp, D. and Polito, L. C. (1998) Development 125, 1495-1500) suggesting that, in these non-drosophilid species, Sxl performs a function different from that in sex determination.
Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Houseflies/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/biosynthesis , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Sex Determination Processes , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Crosses, Genetic , DNA Primers , Diptera/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/physiology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Houseflies/embryology , Insect Hormones/genetics , Male , Molecular Sequence Data , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Sex Differentiation , Species Specificity , X Chromosome , Y ChromosomeABSTRACT
We have analysed the cell lineage relationships between larval and imaginal mesodermal primordia at the blastoderm stage by homotopic single cell transplantations. The primordia of adepithelial cells, the precursors of adult thoracic muscles, are restricted to the region from 50 to 65% egg length within the ventrally located mesodermal anlage. Clones of adepithelial cells always show a common cell lineage with larval muscles and in some cases additionally with larval fat body. This proves that at the blastoderm stage the determination of larval vs. imaginal mesodermal primordia has not yet taken place. Larval somatic muscle clones, in contrast to clones in the ectoderm, can overlap several segments, whereas clones of adepithelial cells are always restricted to imaginal discs of one segment.
Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Animals , Blastoderm/cytology , Cell Lineage , Epithelium/embryology , Larva/cytology , Mesoderm/cytologyABSTRACT
In holometabolous development, higher insects have two different life forms, the larva and the imago. Both larval and imaginal cells are derived from cells of the blastoderm stage. After the final embryonic wave of mitosis, however, only the imaginal cells remain diploid, proliferate massively and do not differentiate until metamorphosis. The separation of these two pathways was described by many authors as a fundamental process that must take place at a very early stage of development, most probably the blastoderm stage. Mainly by using single cell transplantations at the blastoderm or early gastrula stages, respectively, we found common cell lineages between larval and imaginal structures by clones overlapping in the ectoderm (i.e. larval epidermal cells and imaginal discs within a segment, or larval and imaginal salivary gland cells), the mesoderm (i.e. larval somatic muscles and adepithelial cells), and the endoderm (i.e. larval and imaginal midgut cells). From these findings we conclude that it seems to be a principle in Drosophila embryogenesis that the separation of larval and imaginal pathways is postponed to a later developmental stage.
Subject(s)
Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/growth & development , Animals , Blastoderm/cytology , Cell Transplantation , Drosophila/genetics , Gastrula/cytology , Larva/cytology , Larva/growth & development , Malpighian Tubules/embryology , Malpighian Tubules/growth & development , Metamorphosis, Biological , MitosisABSTRACT
Our previous cell lineage analysis of the thoracic disc primordia of Drosophila showed that at the blastoderm and early gastrula stage, cells are not yet committed to form either larval or imaginal tissue (Meise and Janning, 1993). We have now refined our studies on the cell lineage and have mapped the imaginal primordia in the thoracic region. Homotopic transplantations of single cells within the thoracic region of blastoderm and early gastrula stages show that the precursor cells of thoracic imaginal discs are locally restricted to a small lateral area of the thoracic region. Clones labelling leg discs frequently included the Keilin's organs. Heterotopic transplantations along the dorsoventral axis indicate that cells within the thoracic region are not yet committed with respect to larval or imaginal tissue, their fate being dependent on the position where the transplanted cell had been deposited. On the other hand, cells taken from the abdominal anlagen and transplanted into the region of thoracic disc primordia could not participate in the formation of imaginal discs. This shows that, in contrast to the dorsoventral axis, determinative events had separated primordia along the anterior-posterior axis.
