Quality of life during the first year after partial laryngectomy: Longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study was conducted to assess changes in quality of life (QOL) of patients who undergo a partial laryngectomy. METHODS: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires Core and Head and Neck (EORTC-QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35) were used preprocedure (n = 218), 1 week (n = 159), 3 months (n = 122), and 1 year after partial laryngectomy (n = 88). Changes over time were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Holm-Bonferroni method, and interpreted regarding clinical relevance. RESULTS: Most subscales worsened 1 week postprocedure, but many recovered to baseline level after 1 year. Dyspnea and cognitive functioning deteriorated over time, with worst scores recorded after 1 year. Financial difficulties and fatigue increased after surgery and maintained that level throughout the follow-up period; sticky saliva remained worse than at baseline, despite some improvements over time. CONCLUSION: The discovered limitations of QOL should be observed more closely during follow-up treatment, and patients should be informed about these potential effects before partial laryngectomy.

Quality of life before and after total laryngectomy: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine what quality of life (QOL) areas improve and deteriorate during the first year after total laryngectomy and to identify predictors of these changes. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL questionnaires before laryngectomy, n = 133 before discharge from hospital, n = 110 at the end of rehabilitation, and n = 86 1 year after laryngectomy. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect of potential predictors on QOL. RESULTS: Areas that did not recover to baseline level were physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, financial difficulties, senses, speech, and social contact, whereas global health status, coughing, and weight improved. There was no evidence for predicting effects of age, sex, education, and tumor site. Tumor stage, recurrent disease, radiotherapy, and mental health did display predicting effects. Smoking status before the treatment had marginally significant effects. CONCLUSION: QOL decreases initially after laryngectomy; some QOL areas recover slowly over the course of the year after surgery, and some remain significantly worse than at baseline.

[Psychological morbidity in spouses of laryngectomized cancer patients: factors related to the probability of its occurrence]. / Psychische Morbidität bei Partnern kehlkopfloser Karzinompatienten: Womit hängt die Auftrittswahrscheinlichkeit zusammen?

In a multicenter cross-sectional study of 106 spouses of laryngectomized patients differences between spouses with a mental disorder and spouses without were analyzed. The probability of occurrence was mainly related to relationship factors: Spouses, who reported a better quality of their relationship with the patient (OR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.631-0.939; p=0.010), whose sexual desire was not diminished in response to their partner's disease (OR=0.077; 95% CI: 0.011-0.527; p=0.009) and who had no problems in dealing with the tracheostomy (OR=0.062; 95% CI: 0.006-0.619; p=0.018) presented a mental disorder less frequently. The cross-sectional nature of this study does not allow conclusions regarding causality. The results should be reappraised in a longitudinal study. However, the findings suggest that patients with laryngectomy and their families should be also offered couple interventions besides individual counseling.

Clinical relevance of quality-of-life data in laryngectomized patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Statistically significant differences in health-related quality of life (HRQL) are not always clinically relevant. It is also plausible that patients perceive other changes to be relevant than health professionals do. The objective of this study was to find thresholds for HRQL that laryngectomees consider to be clinically relevant 1 year after surgery, (i.e., the level of HRQL that patients rate as satisfactory). A second aim was to investigate how many laryngectomized patients reached those targets. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 28 patients 1 year following laryngectomy and 24 healthcare professionals (HCPs) defined target values for the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35. In another sample of 157 laryngectomized patients 1 year following laryngectomy, we determined what percentage of patients reached these thresholds. RESULTS: Patients are the most accepting of sensory impairments (56.5), coughing (53.6), and dyspnea (44.0), whereas constipation (9.1) and nausea/vomiting (10.7) were rated as being the most troublesome symptoms. HCPs assessed more of the studied complaints as being tolerable than patients did, especially in psychosocial domains. Between 34.5% (senses) and 86.5% (constipation) of the reference group hit the predefined targets at different scales. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms caused by disease are easier for patients to live with than more general nonspecific symptoms. Taking into account that some adverse effects of disease or therapy are partially irreversible, target values additional to changes of HRQL can be helpful when interpreting data.

Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 in patients with laryngeal cancer after surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to test the validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core Module (QLQ-C30) and Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35) for patients who have undergone surgery due to laryngeal cancer. METHODS: A total of 323 patients from 6 different centers in Germany who had been operated on completed the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-H&N35 in addition to being surveyed in a personal interview. RESULTS: Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed the proposed scale structure of both questionnaires. Cronbach's alpha of the QLQ-C30 scales ranged from 0.64 (Cognitive Functioning) to 0.94 (Global Health Status); the alpha of the QLQ-H&N35 ranged from 0.55 (Speech) to 0.90 (Sexuality). Known-groups comparisons showed multiple differences in sociodemographic and clinical variables. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, is a reliable instrument that is able to differentiate between diverse groups of patients with laryngeal cancer after surgery.

Sexual problems after total or partial laryngectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate sexual problems that can occur after laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer surgery and to specify possible influencing factors. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-institutional cross-sectional study. METHODS: Two hundred six patients were interviewed in person using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a structured interview assessing alcohol and tobacco consumption, sociodemographic data, and specific sexual problems. Type of surgery, tumor site, and tumor stage were documented according to the participants' medical records. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to assess the independent impact of each factor. RESULTS: More than half of the patients in our study reported having reduced libido and sexual enjoyment after treatment. Sixty percent considered it an important issue for their contentment with life. Sexual difficulties were found to be unrelated with gender, formal education, alcohol and tobacco consumption, type of surgery (partial vs. total laryngectomy), radiotherapy, and tumor site. Psychological distress (F = 46.27, P < .001) was seen to have a strong independent impact on the occurrence of sexual difficulties and stage of disease (F = 4.50, P < .05) and age (F = 4.79, P < .05), a moderate independent impact. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced libido and sexual enjoyment is a common problem after laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer surgery. However, it is not caused by the oncological treatment but rather by the cancer itself. Depression is often associated with sexual problems. Both should be discussed in medical consultations with head and neck cancer patients when appropriate to provide adequate treatment.