ABSTRACT
This study was aimed to assess the effectiveness of two methods for cryopreservation of dog epididymal spermatozoa, one by conventional freezing (CF) with shortening both equilibration and cooling times, and the other by ultra-rapid freezing (URF) with nonpermeable cryoprotectant. Sixty epididymides were recovered from thirty orchiectomized adult dogs and the sperm samples were retrieved by retrograde flushing using TCG-EY (tris, citric acid, glucose + 20% egg yolk) extender and then 20 pools were conformed. Each pool was divided into 2 aliquots and then cryopreserved by CF and URF methods respectively. The CF method maintained the cooled-pool samples for 2h (1h without and 1h with 5% glycerol) and then were frozen by liquid nitrogen (LN2) vapors for 2 min. The URF method cryopreserved the cooled-pool samples using TCG-EY+250 mM sucrose, equilibrating during 30 min (5 °C) and submerging 30-µL drops directly in LN2. The results showed that the URF method produced a lower percentage of total and progressive motilities and acrosome integrity (P < 0.05) than the CF method. However, the kinetic variables (curvilinear and straight-line velocities, straightness, linearity, wobble, amplitude of lateral head displacement, and beat-cross frequency) and plasma membrane integrity did not differ (P > 0.05) between both cryopreservation methods. Unlike the URF method, the width, area and perimeter of sperm head were reduced after the CF method (P < 0.05). In conclusion, despite the low motility achieved after the ultra-rapid freezing method, the similar values of kinetic, viability and head morphometric dimensions to those obtained after conventional freezing, suggest that ultra-rapid freezing with sucrose may be a useful alternative for the cryopreservation of canine epididymal sperm.
