Carotid Endarterectomy Outcomes in the Elderly: A Canadian Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established surgical intervention for stroke prevention in patients with carotid stenosis of all ages. However, the decision to proceed to operate in the elderly involves a more complicated risk-benefit assessment due in part to increased comorbidities and reduced life expectancy. Some studies suggest that CEA is more risky in the elderly with worse outcomes, whereas others have found no difference. Our objective was to evaluate and compare outcomes of CEA between elderly and younger patients at our institution. METHODS: All hospital charts were reviewed for consecutive patients undergoing CEA from the Jewish General Hospital and the Royal Victoria Hospital from October 2009 to December 2015. Primary outcomes were ipsilateral stroke, death, and restenosis at 30 days and 1 year. Secondary outcomes were cranial nerve injury, myocardial infarction (MI), hematoma, wound infection, cerebral hyperperfusion, and transient ischemic attacks within 30 days. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between patients aged ≥80 years and <80 years. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients were included in this study with a mean age of 70.2 ± 9.5 years (n = 247 [68.4%] male and n = 272 [75.8%] symptomatic). Elderly patients were more often symptomatic (93.8% vs. 71.6%, P < 0.0001) and had an increased length of stay (2.8 ± 5.3 vs. 1.6 ± 1.8, P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in primary outcomes between patients aged <80 years and ≥80 years, including 30-day stroke (1.7% vs. 0%), death (no deaths in either group), restenosis (8.8% vs. 12.3%), 1-year stroke (1.7% vs. 0%), death (0.7% vs. 0%), or restenosis (14.9% vs. 13.8%). However, elderly patients had significantly increased MI risk postoperatively (4.6% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.01). Other complications, including cranial nerve injury (3.7% in <80 years vs. 4.6% in the elderly group), were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that CEA in the elderly does not have an increased risk of stroke or death up to one year postoperatively. However, the postoperative length of stay is increased and complicated by significantly more MIs, which should weigh into the decision of whether to perform CEA on an elderly patient.

Is pelvic ultrasound associated with an increased time to appendectomy in pediatric appendicitis?

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is a common pediatric condition requiring urgent surgical intervention to prevent complications. Pelvic ultrasound (US) as a diagnostic aid has become increasingly common. Despite its advantages, evidence suggests US can lead to delayed definitive management. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to test the hypothesis that US is associated with an increased time to appendectomy in children with acute appendicitis. METHODS: A chart review was conducted of all children aged 0-17 years who presented to the pediatric emergency department (ED) with a discharge diagnosis of appendicitis. The primary outcome variable was the interval between initial evaluation to appendectomy between patients who received an US and those who did not. RESULTS: Of 662 cases included, 424 patients (64%) underwent a pelvic US and 238 patients underwent an appendectomy without US. Median time interval from initial evaluation in the ED by a physician to appendectomy among patients who received an US was 9.7 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.8-15.0 h) compared with 5.5 h (IQR: 3.8-8.6 h) among patients who did not receive an US (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.001). The increased time to appendectomy in patients who received an US was dependent on the patient being female and presenting to the ED after hours (univariate analysis of variance test for interaction, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Female pediatric patients and those presenting after hours that undergo an US have a significantly increased time to appendectomy compared with those who do not undergo diagnostic imaging.