Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.

INTRODUCTION: Imaging of the cervical spine in general radiography is most frequently performed using an anti-scatter grid. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a gridless setting on image quality and radiation dose during digital radiography of the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) cervical spine. METHODS: A phantom study was performed with a variety of tube voltages (63-75 kV) with and without an anti-scatter grid. The tube current time product (mAs) and dose area product (DAP) were recorded and used to calculate effective dose (ED) and individual organ dose using PCXMC 2.0 software, as well as entrance surface dose (ESD) and objective image quality: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective visual image quality grading characteristics (VGC) was performed by five qualified radiographers. RESULTS: In a gridless setting, the AP and LAT positions showed significantly lower DAP (1.6 µGym2; 61.3 % and 1.6 µGym2; 51.2%), ESD (27.6 µGy; 57.3% and 77.2 µGy; 47.2%) and ED (4.2 µSv; 61.3% and 2.3 µSv; 48.9%). In a gridless setting in the AP position, there is a slight significant deterioration in image quality. In the lateral projection, on the other hand, the image quality without the use of grid was only significantly reduced in three of six criteria and there was no difference in the objective image quality between the two settings examined. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that gridless setting significantly decreases radiation dose and image quality, but the quality in the lateral projection is still acceptable for diagnostic purpose. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The protocol without the use of the anti-scatter grid in cervical spine radiography leads to a reduction in the radiation dose in both projections, but the image quality in the AP is significantly reduced for all criteria examined, with a slight deterioration in image quality in the lateral projection.

Erect pelvic radiography with fat tissue displacement: Impact on radiation dose and image quality.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic radiography is one of the most frequent general radiography imaging procedures. Pelvic radiography is usually performed in the supine position, but in some cases erect imaging is performed. The aim of this study was to determine whether radiation dose and image quality differ between two different erect pelvic radiographic procedures in overweight and obese patients, with and without displacement of anterior adipose tissue. METHODS: This research was a two-part study. The first part of the study was to determine a suitable fat displacement band that would not produce artifacts on the resulting radiograph when fat tissue was displaced. The second part of the study was performed in a clinical setting on 60 overweight or obese patients (BMI ≥25) referred for erect pelvic imaging. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups, half of which displaced adipose tissue from the region of interest and the other group did not. Waist and hip circumference, height, weight, dose-area- product (DAP), primary field size, source-to-skin distance, mAs, and kV were measured. Body Mass Index (BMI), entrance surface dose (ESD), and effective dose (ED) were then calculated. The resulting images were evaluated by three radiologists. RESULTS: It was found that a thin cotton triangular bandage produced no visible radiographic artefacts. In the group of patients using the fat displacement protocol, a statistically significant reduction in waist circumference (4.7%), DAP (38.5%), ESD (44%) and ED (38.7%) were observed (p < 0.05). In addition, a significant (p < 0.05) increase was found for all the observed image quality criteria and overall total image score with exception of sacroiliac joint, iliac crest and pubic/ischial rami. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, the use of the adipose tissue displacement protocol for radiography of the pelvis and hip in the erect position in overweight and obese patients is recommended. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of cotton bands to remove adipose tissue during pelvic imaging in obese and overweight patients results in a reduction of radiation dose received by the patient and improves image quality. This technique is quick, easy, and inexpensive.

The impact of subjective image quality evaluation in mammography.

INTRODUCTION: According to the guidelines, the mammograms obtained in a screening program must be evaluated to ensure that the quality of the images obtained is above 75% of score 1 (perfect and good) and less than 3% of score 3 (inadequate). This is performed by a person (usually a radiographer), so subjectivity may influence the final evaluation of the images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of subjectivity on breast positioning assessments on resultant screening mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five radiographers evaluated a total of 1000 mammograms. One radiographer was an expert in assessing mammography images, while the other four evaluators had varying levels of experience. All images were anonymized, and the ViewDEX software was used for visual grading analysis. The evaluators were divided into two groups, each with two evaluators. Each group evaluated 600 images, with 200 images identical between the two groups. All images had already been evaluated by the expert radiographer. All scores were compared using the Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa coefficient and accuracy score. RESULTS: The results from Fleiss' kappa showed fair agreement in the mediolateral oblique (MLO) projection in the first group of evaluators whereas the other results showed poor agreement. When comparing the results from Cohen's kappa a maximum value of agreement between the evaluators was moderate 0.433 [95% CI 0.264-0.587] for the craniocaudal (CC) projection and 0.374 [95% CI 0.212-0.538] for the MLO projection. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we can conclude that the agreement between all five raters was poor for both CC (κ = 0.165) and MLO (κ = 0.135) projections, based on the results of Fleiss' kappa statistic. The results show that the influence of subjectivity has a great impact on the evaluation of the quality of mammography images. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Thus, the images are evaluated by a person, which has a high impact on subjectivity in the assessment of positioning in mammography. To achieve a more objective assessment of the images and the resulting agreement between the evaluators, we would propose to change the method of assessment. The images could be evaluated by two persons, and in the event of a discrepancy, the images would be evaluated by a third person. A computer programme could also be developed that would allow a more objective evaluation based on the geometric characteristics of the image (angle and length of the pectoral muscle, symmetry, etc.).

Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).

INTRODUCTION: The Radiography Research Ethics Standards for Europe (RRESFE) project aims to provide a cross-sectional snapshot of current research ethics systems, processes, and awareness of such, across Europe together with identifying the associated challenges, education, and training needs. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey targeting radiography researchers in Europe was conducted. Data collection took place between April 26 and July 12, 2021, using a snowball sampling approach. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to identify trends in research ethics frameworks across Europe. RESULTS: 285 responses were received across 33 European and 23 non-European countries. Most (n = 221; 95%) European respondents stated ethics approval is required before commencing research in their country. Requirements around research ethics approval and awareness of such requirements varied by European region (X2 (2, n = 129) = 7.234, p = 0.013) and were found to differ depending on the type of research participant and study design. Additionally, European respondents reported ethics approval is a national requirement more often than their non-European counterparts (X2 (1, n = 282) = 4.316, p = 0.049). Requirements for ethics approval were also associated with the undergraduate programme duration (2-year vs. 3-year vs. 3.5 year vs. 4-year vs. multiple programme durations; X2 (4, n = 231) = 10.075, p = 0.016) and availability of postgraduate training (postgraduate training available vs. postgraduate training not available; X2 (1, n = 231) = 15.448, p = <0.001) within respondents' country. CONCLUSION: Respondents from countries with longer programme durations/availability of multiple programme lengths, availability of postgraduate training, and establishment of European Qualifications Framework Level 6 were generally associated with less uncertainty and more comprehensive research ethics requirements. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Results are informative of the current status of research ethics within evidence-based radiography.

Research ethics training, challenges, and suggested improvements across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).

INTRODUCTION: The Radiography Research Ethics Standards for Europe (RRESFE) project aimed to provide a cross-sectional view of the current state of radiography research ethics across Europe. This included investigating education and training in research ethics, and identifying the key challenges and potential improvements associated with using existing research ethics frameworks. METHODS: This cross-sectional online survey targeting radiography researchers in Europe was conducted between April 26 and July 12, 2021. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to identify research ethics education and training trends. Content analysis of qualitative responses was employed to identify significant challenges and proposed improvements in research ethics frameworks of practice. RESULTS: There were 232 responses received across 33 European countries. Most (n = 132; 57%) respondents had received some research ethics training; however, fewer participants had received training on safeguarding vulnerable patients (n = 72; 38%), diversity and inclusivity (n = 62; 33%), or research with healthy volunteers (n = 60; 32%). Training was associated with a greater perceived importance of the need for research ethics review (p = 0.031) and with the establishment of EQF Level 6 training (p = 0.038). The proportion of formally trained researchers also varied by region (p = <0.001). Time-to-ethics-approval was noted as the biggest challenge for professionals making research ethics applications. CONCLUSION: Early and universal integration of research-oriented teaching within the radiography education framework which emphasises research ethics is recommended. Additionally, study findings suggest research ethics committee application and approval processes could be further simplified and streamlined. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The survey contributes to a growing body of knowledge surrounding the importance of education and training in research ethics for assuring a high standard of research outputs in Radiography and has identified hurdles to obtaining research ethics approval for further investigation and address.

How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?

INTRODUCTION: When comparing the radiation dose to the patient, the lumbar spine has one of the highest dose values in general radiography, therefore the procedure needs to be optimised. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a non-optimal tube potential (66 kV) during anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine radiography on the radiation dose received by the patient compared with the radiation dose when an optimal tube potential (79 kV) is used, in accordance with European guidelines. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 100 patients referred for lumbar radiography in two different diagnostic departments. Half of the patients were admitted to a department which used optimal tube potential and the other half to the department which used non-optimal tube potential for AP lumbar spine radiography protocols. The height and weight of the patients were collected to calculate the body mass index (BMI) of the patients. The image field size and dose area product (DAP) values were collected after each imaging session. The effective dose and selected organ dose were calculated using the PCXMC 2.0 program. RESULTS: The results showed that a non-optimal tube potential resulted in a significant increase in the DAP value by 360% (p < 0.001) and a significant increase in the effective dose by 160% (p < 0.001). Dose to selected organs due to non-optimal tube potential increased from 107% (breasts) up to 631% (prostate) (p < 0.001). The images were not assessed using visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis, but the radiologists evaluated all the images appropriate for diagnostic reading. CONCLUSION: Based on our study's stated results, we can conclude that optimal tube potential use is essential to achieve the ALARA principle. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The study shows the effect of a non-optimal tube potential on the radiation dose received by the patient during radiography of the lumbar spine. This could influence possible diagnostic departments to consider protocol optimisation due to the high radiation dose received by the patient.

Reduction of visual acuity decreases capacity to evaluate radiographic image quality.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the impact of reduced visual acuity on the evaluation of a test object and appendicular radiographs. METHODS: Visual acuity was reduced by two different magnitudes using simulation glasses and compared to normal vision (no glasses). During phase one phantom images were produced for the purpose of counting objects by 13 observers and on phase 2 image appraisal of anatomical structures was performed on anonymized radiographic images by 7 observers. The monitors were calibrated (SMPTE RP133 test pattern) and the room lighting was maintained at 7 ± 1 lux. Image display and data on grading were managed using ViewDEX (v.2.0) and the area under the visual grading characteristic (AUCVGC) was calculated using VGC Analyzer (v1.0.2). Inferential statistics were calculated using SPSS. RESULTS: For the evaluation of appendicular radiographs the total interpretation time was longer when visual acuity was reduced with 2 pairs of simulation glasses (15.4 versus 8.9 min). Visual grading analysis showed that observers can lose the ability to detect anatomical and contrast differences when they have a simulated visual acuity reduction, being more challenging to differentiate low contrast details. No simulation glasses, compared to 1 pair gives an AUCVGC of 0.302 (0.280, 0.333), that decreases to 0.197 (0.175, 0.223) when using 2 pairs of glasses. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced visual acuity has a significant negative impact on the evaluation of test objects and clinical images. Further work is required to test the impact of reduced visual acuity on visual search, technical evaluation of a wider range of images as well as pathology detection/characterization performance. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It seems that visual performance needs to be considered to reduce the risks associated with incomplete or incorrect diagnosis. If employers or professional bodies were to introduce regular eye tests into health screening it may reduce the risk of misinterpretation as a result of poor vision.