Risk factors of pancreatic graft loss and death of receptor after simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation.

Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants require a long graft survival and the recipient to present with more benefits than risks. We evaluated the risk factors of receptor's death and pancreatic graft loss on 2 occasions (3 and 12 months' postoperatively) in 292 transplants in whom 22 variables were evaluated. Variables were selected, 9 receivers, 8 donors, and 5 variables related to the surgical procedure. All independent variables were compared with the dependent variables of pancreatic graft losses and patient deaths. Those considered significant according to univariate analysis were analyzed by using multiple logistic regression techniques in an attempt to develop a mathematical model capable of predicting both pancreatic graft and patient losses. Lastly, based on the resulting models with all significant variables, scores were created to determine the risk of patient death and pancreatic graft loss. In the adjusted multivariate analysis, the significant variables were donor age, receiver's body mass index, initial pancreas implant, iliac venous drainage, and use of induction therapy related to pancreatic loss within 3 months after transplantation. Independent risk factors regarding the loss of patients within 12 months were body mass index and receptor induction therapy. The variables related to pancreatic graft loss within 3 months were donor age, receiver body mass index, initial use of pancreatic graft, iliac venous drainage, and induction therapy; these variables can be used for creating a risk score. The donor body mass index and the induction therapy were independently related to patient loss within 12 months after the transplant.

Delayed kidney allograft function after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is one of the treatments for insulin-dependent chronic renal failure patients. METHODS: One-year patient and kidney allograft survival rates of 150 patients undergoing SPKT were subjected to Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Uni- and multivariate methods identified risk factors involved in allograft and patient survival. RESULTS: One-year patient and kidney allograft survival rates were 82% and 80%, respectively. Delayed graft function (DGF) (P = .001; hazard ratio [HR]5.41) and acute kidney rejection episodes (P = .016; HR 3.36) were related to 1 year patient survival as well as intra-abdominal infection (IAI) rates. (IAI). One-year kidney allograft survival was related to DGF (P = .013; odds ratio [OR] 3.39), acute rejection (P = .001; OR 4.74), and IAI (P = .003, OR 6.29). DGF was related to a time on dialysis >27 months (P = .046; OR 2.59), cold kidney ischemia time >14 hours (P = .027; OR 2.94), donor age >25 years (P = .03; OR 2.82), and donor serum sodium concentration >155 mEq/L (P < .0001; OR 1.09). Female kidney to male recipient in 17% of the cases did not increase the risk of DGF. We observed an important correlation between donor serum sodium and creatinine (P < .0001), which suggested undertreatment of diabetes insipidus secondary to brain death. CONCLUSIONS: DGF, acute rejection, and IAI were the main determinants of survival after SPKT. Improving the care of deceased donors may reduce DGF occurrence.

Extreme subcutaneous, intramuscular and inhaled insulin resistance treated by pancreas transplantation alone.

Diabetes mellitus with resistance to insulin administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly (DRIASM) is a rare syndrome and is usually treated with continuous intravenous insulin infusion. We present here two cases of DRIASM in 16 and 18 years female patients that were submitted to pancreas transplantation alone (PTA). Both were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes as young children and had labile glycemic control with recurrent episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis. They had prolonged periods of hospitalization and complications related to their central venous access. Exocrine and endocrine drainages were in the bladder and systemic, respectively. Both presented immediate graft function. In patient 1, enteric conversion was necessary due to reflux pancreatitis. Patient 2 developed mild postoperative hyperglycemia in spite of having normal pancreas allograft biopsy and that was attributed to her immunosuppressive regimen. Patient 1 died 9 months after PTA from septic shock related to pneumonia. In 8 months of follow-up, Patient 2 presented optimal glycemic control without the use of antidiabetic agents. In conclusion, PTA may be an alternative treatment for DRIASM patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse gastrointestinal events are frequent after mycophenolate use. The objectives of the present study were to report the incidence of acute noninfectious diarrhea, to determine the risk factors, and to compare the severity of reactions between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPKT). METHODS: We included 165 SPKT patients from December 2000 to May 2007. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed, using acute noninfectious diarrhea as the dependent variable. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Mean age and duration of dialysis and of diabetes were 34.9 +/- 8.2 years, 27.3 +/- 18.3 months, and 21.9 +/- 16.2 years, respectively. Sixty-three percent used MMF, 36.4% used EC-MPS, and 0.6% used azathioprine. Multivariate analysis showed that the duration of diabetes (P = .049, confidence interval [CI] 1.0- 1.13) and MMF use (P = .013, 95% CI 0.2-0.82) were the main determinants of acute diarrhea after SPKT. MMF dose reduction (79.2% vs 62.3%, P = .024) and severity of diarrhea associated with orthostatic hypotension were more pronounced among MMF than EC-MPS patients (42.4% vs 15.1%, P = .001). There was no difference between MMF and EC-MPS after dose reduction in relation to the occurrence of acute kidney rejection (30.8% vs 26.7%, P = .53). CONCLUSIONS: Acute noninfectious diarrhea after SPKT was related to the duration of diabetes and to prescription of MMF. Preferential use of EC-MPS was associated with a lower necessity of dose reduction and less severe episodes of acute diarrhea compared with MMF, although dose reduction was equally associated with acute episodes of kidney rejection.

Asynchronous kidney allograft loss after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: impact on pancreas allograft outcome at a single center.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the clinical evolution of pancreas allografts in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) cases after asynchronous kidney allograft loss and kidney retransplantation at a single non-United States center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 168 SPKT from December 2000 to June 2007. RESULTS: The 5-year kidney allograft survival rate was 71%. Excluding cases of death with a functioning graft after SPKT (n = 35; 74.4%), 12 kidney allografts were lost due to acute rejection (n = 7; 15%) or chronic allograft nephropathy (n = 5; 10.6%). Delayed graft function contributed to kidney allograft loss. Five of 12 patients underwent kidney retransplantation. Sixty percent of pancreas allografts were lost after this procedure, which was attributed to either the diabetogenic effects of the immunosuppressive regimen or to the perioperative stress. Oral glucose tolerance tests performed before kidney retransplantation identified patients with good pancreas allograft function versus those with intolerance on glucose tests who received reduced glucocorticoid doses. CONCLUSIONS: In SPKT, pancreas allograft function was seriously affected by kidney retransplantation. Oral glucose tolerance tests performed before kidney retransplantation were helpful to assess beta-cell function and suggest prescription of lower steroid doses to decrease the pancreas allograft dysfunction.

Risk factors for the development of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus in simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients.

We sought to determine the risk factors involved in the development of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Correlations were sought between tacrolimus (FK-506) levels/dose 2-hour capillary glucose (CG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), cyclosporine (CSA) levels/dose with HbA1c, 2-hour CG with prednisone dose and body mass index (BMI) and PTDM. Four patients (9.3%) developed PTDM. Three treated with FK-506 had altered 2-hour CG at 3 months after transplantation; 1 prescribed CSA displayed diabetes diagnosed after 1 year. There was no statistically significant difference among HbA(1c) values and FK-506 (P =.18) or CSA (P =.81) doses or FK-506 (P =.53) and CSA (P =.54) levels. In contrast, there was a statistically significant relationship between elevated 2-hour CG (> or =200 mg/dL) and daily prednisone dose (9.7 mg vs. 16.2 mg; P =.003). There was no correlation between 2-hour CG and FK-506 dose (P =.084) or FK-506 levels (P =.075). The greater BMI correlated with an increased risk of PTDM (21.25 +/- 3.13 kg/m(2) vs 24.67 +/- 2.38 kg/m(2); P =.034). Two-hour CG may be a useful tool to screen the diabetogenic effects of corticosteroids. A BMI increase should be discouraged due to the risk of PTDM.

Sobrevida de pacientes diabéticos em diálise / Survival of diabetic patients in dialysis

OBJETIVO. Diabetes melito é uma causa de insuficiência renal terminal de importância crescente. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar a sobrevida depacientes diabéticos e näo-diabéticos em tratamento dialítico. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS. Foram estudados 295 pacientes em programa de diálise em um centro de referência terciário na cidade de Säo Paulo, entre 1992 e 1994. Setenta e um paciente eram diabéticos (17 do tipo I e 54 do tipo II) e 224 tinham outros diagnósticos dedoença de base. Os dados foram coletados prospectivamente através de formuláriospadronizados, e também retrospectivamente, para pacientes que iniciaram tratamento entre 1992 e junho 1993. Análise de sobrevida foi realizada por meio do método do produto limite. RESULTADOS. Os pacientes diabéticos apresentavam média de idade mais elevada e uma maior proporçäo utilizava diálise peritoneal em relaçäo aos näo-diabéticos. Após um ano, a taxa de sobrevida foi 67 por cento e 86 por cento para pacientes diabéticos e näo-diabéticos (p<0,0001). A diferença de sobrevida se acentuou com a duraçäo do tratamento. Esta diferença foi observada tantoem pacientes mais jovens (ó50 anos) quanto nos mais idosos, embora tenha sido mais precoce nos primeiros. A sobrevida dos diabéticos permaneceu significantemente reduzida, ajustando-se para a idade dos pacientes. CONCLUSÖES. Pacientes diabéticos em diálise apresentam taxa de sobrevida inferior aos näo-diabéticos, independentemente da sua idade média mais elevada. Cuidados especiais devem ser dedicados a estes pacientes, tanto em relaçäo a fatores co-mórbidos pré-diálise quanto durante o tratamento dialítico, a fim de se melhorar a sua sobrevida.

[Survival of dialyzed diabetic patients]. / Sobrevida de pacientes diabéticos em diálise.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes is a cause of end-stage renal failure of increasing importance. Our aim was to evaluate the survival of diabetic and non-diabetic patients on dialysis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients on dialysis program in a tertiary referral center of the São Paulo city, from 1992-94, were studied. Seventy-one patients were diabetics (17 type I and 54 type II) and 224 had other diagnoses of renal disease. Data were prospectively collected using standard questionnaires and also retrospectively for patients who started treatment between 1992 and June 1993. Survival analysis was done using the product-limit method. RESULTS: Diabetic patients had a greater mean age and a higher proportion on peritoneal dialysis than non-diabetics. After one year, survival rates were 67% and 86% for diabetics and non-diabetics (p < 0.0001). The difference in survival rates increased with the duration of treatment. This difference was observed both in young (< or = 50 years) and in elderly patients, although it has been noted earlier in the former. Survival of diabetics remained significantly reduced adjusting for the age of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients on dialysis have lower survival rates than non-diabetics, independently of their greater mean age. Special attention should be given to these patients, both in relation to pre-dialysis comorbidity and during dialysis treatment, to improve their survival experience.