Does compartmental resection really impact retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas? A retrospective analysis from a Single Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of choice for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) is surgical resection; the outcomes with more radical surgeries, notably compartmental resection, remains a subject of debate. Arguments against it, include the complexity of the technique and high morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of cases treated in a single center from January 2010 to December 2019 is presented. Two time periods were evaluated: 2010-2015 and 2016-2019, corresponding to before and after the implementation of routine compartmentectomy. We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of compartmental resection compared to limited surgeries through a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 176 cases were included, of which 102 met the inclusion criteria. The sex distribution was similar. The average age was 52.9 years, and the average tumor size was 24.5 cm. The most frequent histology was liposarcoma (65.7%), followed by leiomyosarcoma (12.7%), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (8.8%). The median follow-up period was 40 months. We found a lower local recurrence in the group treated in the recent period (compartmentectomy) 42.3% vs 20% p = 0.007. The median overall survival (OS) was 38.7 months, and there was no difference in distant recurrence between the two time periods. Postoperative morbidity was higher in the recent period (25% vs 10% p 0.041), with no difference in 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of extensive surgery, specifically compartmentectomy, for retroperitoneal sarcomas has been linked to reduced local recurrence. We recommend considering this surgical approach for RPS in alignment with current expert consensus guidelines, as highlighted by the updated TARPSWG consensus.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in extremities undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in peripheral blood reflects the balance between systemic inflammation and immunity and has been reported as a prognostic biomarker in many neoplastic diseases, but its role in sarcomas has been poorly investigated. In this paper we analyzed the prognostic role of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in extremity undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (eUPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective study including all eUPS cases treated at the National Institute of Cancer in Mexico City from January 2000 to December 2018. We used a ROC analysis to find the cut-off point where the NLR had the best value in predicting death (area under the curve: 0.73, P = 0.001). When the cut-off point was set at 3.09, the sensitivity of the test was 79% and the specificity was 59%. Demographic and clinical variables using log-rank test were also analyzed. Univariate Cox regression analyses and multivariate proportional hazards regression model were carried out to identify independent prognostic factors for Overall survival (OS), Disease-free survival (DFS), Metastasis free survival (MFS) and their association with the NLR. RESULTS: We included 112 cases, 53.6% were women. Most cases were stage IIIA (33.9%) or IIIB (30.4%) and Grade 3 (91.1%). High NLR correlated with metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.001), locally advanced stage (p = 0.05), worse OS (HR = 1.33, 95% CI:1.01-1.75 p = 0.041) and higher risk of specific death (HR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.88-12.72 p = 0.001). Non-use of chemotherapy (HR: 1.33, 95% CI:1.01-1.75 p = 0.041) was also associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: The NLR is a simple yet useful prognostic factor in patients with eUPS when using a cut-off value of 3.09. Soft tissue sarcomas lack routine biomarkers that are applied widely, therefore we propose to consider and include the NLR in prospective trials or prognostic nomograms.