Assessing cesarean section and inguinal hernia repair as proxy indicators of the total number of surgeries performed in Sierra Leone in 2012.

BACKGROUND: The traditional tools to assess surgical capacity in low-income countries require significant amounts of time and resources, and have thus not been utilized systematically in this context. Proxy indicators have been suggested as a simpler tool to estimate surgical volume. The aim of this study was to assess caesarean section and inguinal hernia repair as proxy indicators of the total number of surgeries performed per capita in a given region of sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Surgical data was compiled from 58 health institutions (96.7%) that performed major surgery in Sierra Leone in 2012. In total, 24,152 operative procedures were included in the study. Validity of proxy indicators was tested by logistic regression analyses with the rate of caesarean sections compared with total operations (%CS), hernia repairs (%HR) or both (%CS&HR) as dependent variables and the operations per 100,000 capita as the covariate. RESULTS: There was significant correlation for each of the proxy indicators, with the estimated odds ratio for %CS being 0.675 (95% CI, 0.520-0.876; P < .01), the estimated odds ratio for %HR being 0.822 (95% CI, 0.688-0.983; P < .05), and the estimated odds ratio for %CS&HR being 0.838 (95% CI, 0.731-0.962; P < .05). CONCLUSION: The unmet need for surgical services in a region of sub-Saharan Africa can be estimated by using any of the 3 proxy indicators. However, it seems that %CS is more sensitive for small changes in operations per 100,000 capita, compared with the %HR. There is no obvious added benefit for using the combined proxy indicator.

The roles of the health sector and health workers before, during and after violent conflict.

Starting with a view of war as a significant population health problem, this article explores the roles of health workers in relation to violent conflict. Four different roles are identified, defined by goals and values--military, development, humanitarian and peace. In addition, four dimensions of health work are seen as cross-cutting factors influencing health work in violent conflict-- whether the health worker is an insider or outsider to the conflict, whether they are oriented to primary, secondary or tertiary prevention of the mortality and morbidity of war, whether they take an individual clinical or a population health approach, and whether they are oriented to policy and whole-sector change or not. This article explores the nature of these roles, the influence of these cross-cutting dimensions, the challenges of each role and finally commonalities and possibilities for cooperation between roles.

[Prepared for medical peace work?]. / Laerer leger nok om fredsarbeid?

Physicians have a notable record in peace work; medically motivated truces and protests against nuclear arms and are two such examples. It is not required that a doctor who wishes to make a difference in this field has a special interest or particular affiliation. This comment applies a holistic approach to peace, and shows that violence prevention and peace promotion at all societal levels (including interpersonal violence and structural violence) is already integrated in medical training, research and practice. And to physicians who wish to strengthen their peace skills, several training opportunities are now emerging.