Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
BMC Med Ethics ; 17(1): 59, 2016 10 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27733160

ABSTRACT

Pediatric biobanking is considered important for generating biomedical knowledge and improving (pediatric) health care. However, the inclusion of children's samples in biobanks involves specific ethical issues. One of the main concerns is how to appropriately engage children in the consent procedure. We suggest that children should be involved through a personalized assent procedure, which means that both the content and the process of assent are adjusted to the individual child. In this paper we provide guidance on how to put personalized assent into pediatric biobanking practice and consider both the content and process of personalized assent. In the discussion we argue that the assent procedure itself is formative. Investing in the procedure should be a requirement for pediatric biobank research. Although personalized assent will require certain efforts, the pediatric (biobank) community must be aware of its importance. The investment and trust earned can result in ongoing engagement, important longitudinal information, and stability in/for the research infrastructure, as well as increased knowledge among its participants about research activity. Implementing personalized assent will both respect the child and support biobank research.


Subject(s)
Biological Specimen Banks/ethics , Biomedical Research/ethics , Decision Making/ethics , Informed Consent By Minors/ethics , Child , Humans
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 15: 25, 2015 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25608775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Around the world, the last two decades have been characterised by an increase in the numbers of mergers between healthcare providers, including some of the most prestigious university hospitals and academic health centres. However, many mergers fail to bring the anticipated benefits, and successful post-merger integration in university hospitals and academic health centres is even harder to achieve. An increasing body of literature suggests that organisational culture affects the success of post-merger integration and academic-clinical collaboration. METHODS: This paper reports findings from a mixed-methods single-site study to examine 1) the perceptions of organisational culture in academic and clinical enterprises at one National Health Service (NHS) trust, and 2) the major cultural issues for its post-merger integration with another NHS trust and strategic partnership with a university. From the entire population of 72 clinician-scientists at one of the legacy NHS trusts, 38 (53%) completed a quantitative Competing Values Framework survey and 24 (33%) also provided qualitative responses. The survey was followed up by semi-structured interviews with six clinician-scientists and a group discussion including five senior managers. RESULTS: The cultures of two legacy NHS trusts differed and were primarily distinct from the culture of the academic enterprise. Major cultural issues were related to the relative size, influence, and history of the legacy NHS trusts, and the implications of these for respective identities, clinical services, and finances. Strategic partnership with a university served as an important ameliorating consideration in reaching trust merger. However, some aspects of university entrepreneurial culture are difficult to reconcile with the NHS service delivery model and may create tension. CONCLUSIONS: There are challenges in preserving a more desirable culture at one of the legacy NHS trusts, enhancing cultures in both legacy NHS trusts during their post-merger integration, and in aligning academic and clinical cultures following strategic partnership with a university. The seeds of success may be found in current best practice, good will, and a near identical ideal of the future preferred culture. Strong, fair leadership will be required both nationally and locally for the success of mergers and post-merger integration in university hospitals and academic health centres.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Health Facility Merger , Organizational Culture , Cooperative Behavior , England , Health Personnel , Humans , Leadership , State Medicine
3.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 23(2): 141-6, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24801761

ABSTRACT

Biomedical research is being transformed through the application of information technologies that allow ever greater amounts of data to be shared on an unprecedented scale. However, the methods for involving participants have not kept pace with changes in research capability. In an era when information is shared digitally at the global level, mechanisms of informed consent remain static, paper-based and organised around national boundaries and legal frameworks. Dynamic consent (DC) is both a specific project and a wider concept that offers a new approach to consent; one designed to meet the needs of the twenty-first century research landscape. At the heart of DC is a personalised, digital communication interface that connects researchers and participants, placing participants at the heart of decision making. The interface facilitates two-way communication to stimulate a more engaged, informed and scientifically literate participant population where individuals can tailor and manage their own consent preferences. The technical architecture of DC includes components that can securely encrypt sensitive data and allow participant consent preferences to travel with their data and samples when they are shared with third parties. In addition to improving transparency and public trust, this system benefits researchers by streamlining recruitment and enabling more efficient participant recontact. DC has mainly been developed in biobanking contexts, but it also has potential application in other domains for a variety of purposes.


Subject(s)
Databases as Topic , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional-Patient Relations , Computer Security , Information Dissemination , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/standards
4.
Life Sci Soc Policy ; 10: 16, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26573981

ABSTRACT

The right to withdraw from research, along with the necessity of adequately informed consent, is at the heart of the post-Nuremburg code of ethical safeguards in biomedical research on human participants. As biomedical research moves away from direct interventional studies towards research using networks of linked human tissue samples and data, however, questions arise about what withdrawal can and should mean in these new contexts. Some of the more expansive traditional understandings, such as the right to withdraw from a study 'at any time' are limited in practice by the nature of biobank- supported research, particularly where it makes possible widespread dissemination and ongoing reuse of data. It is time for a more nuanced, granular arrangement for withdrawal, appropriate to the ongoing relationships between participants and long-term biobanking enterprises.

5.
Med Law Rev ; 22(1): 64-86, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24136352

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the nature of genomic information, and the moral arguments in support of an individual's right to access it. It analyses the legal avenues an individual might take to access their sequence information. The authors describe the policy implications in this area and conclude that, for now, the law appears to strike an appropriate balance, but new policy will need to be developed to address this issue.


Subject(s)
Genetic Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Testing/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Access to Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Databases, Genetic , Genetic Privacy/ethics , Genetic Research/ethics , Genetic Testing/ethics , Genome, Human , Humans , Patient Access to Records/ethics , United Kingdom
7.
Eur J Health Law ; 18(5): 491-519, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22128519

ABSTRACT

Consent forms are the principal method for obtaining informed consent from biomedical research participants. The significance of these forms is increasing as more secondary research is undertaken on existing research samples and information, and samples are deposited in biobanks accessible to many researchers. We reviewed a selection of consent forms used in European Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and identified four common elements that were found in every consent form. Our analysis showed that only two of the four most commonly found elements in our sample of informed consent forms were required in UK law. This raises questions about what should be put in informed consent forms for research participants. These findings could be beneficial for the formulation of participant information and consent documentation in the future studies.


Subject(s)
Consent Forms/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Research , Research Subjects , Ethics, Research , Genomics , Humans , United Kingdom
9.
Eur J Health Law ; 17(4): 329-44, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20873514

ABSTRACT

Analyses of individuals' genomes--their entire DNA sequence--have increased knowledge about the links between genetics and disease. Anticipated advances in 'next generation' DNA-sequencing techniques will see the routine research use of whole genomes, rather than distinct parts, within the next few years. The scientific benefits of genomic research are, however, accompanied by legal and ethical concerns. Despite the assumption that genetic research data can and will be rendered anonymous, participants' identities can sometimes be elucidated, which could cause data protection legislation to apply. We undertake a timely reappraisal of these laws--particularly new penalties--and identifiability in genomic research.


Subject(s)
Genetic Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Research/ethics , Genetic Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Genome, Human , Humans , United Kingdom
10.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 18(4): 398-403, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19888293

ABSTRACT

The use of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in medical research and the increased ability to share data give a new twist to some of the perennial ethical issues associated with genomic research. GWAS create particular challenges because they produce fine, detailed, genotype information at high resolution, and the results of more focused studies can potentially be used to determine genetic variation for a wide range of conditions and traits. The information from a GWA scan is derived from DNA that is a powerful personal identifier, and can provide information not just on the individual, but also on the individual's relatives, related groups, and populations. Furthermore, it creates large amounts of individual-specific digital information that is easy to share across international borders. This paper provides an overview of some of the key ethical issues around GWAS: consent, feedback of results, privacy, and the governance of research. Many of the questions that lie ahead of us in terms of the next generation sequencing methods will have been foreshadowed by GWAS and the debates around ethical and policy issues that these have created.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Genetic Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Genome, Human , Genome-Wide Association Study , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...