Two-year, real-world erenumab persistence and quality of life data in 82 pooled patients with abrupt onset, unremitting, treatment refractory headache and a migraine phenotype: New daily persistent headache or persistent post-traumatic headache in the majority of cases.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with New Daily Persistent Headache and Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache belong to a heterogeneous group of primary and secondary headache disorders, with the common clinical feature that these conditions start abruptly, continue unabated, and are refractory to conventional migraine preventive treatments. OBJECTIVE: This is a real-world, medium-term audit to explore whether erenumab improves quality of life in a pooled group of 82 abrupt-onset, unremitting and treatment refractory patients, where the diagnosis is new daily persistent headache and persistent post-traumatic headache in the majority of cases. METHODS: Eighty-two patients were treated with erenumab every 28 days over a two to three-year period, beginning in December 2018. These patients were "longstanding chronic" and refractory with a median of eight (IQR 4-12) prior failed migraine preventive treatments and median duration of disease of seven (IQR 3-11) years. The starting dose of erenumab was 70 mg in 79% of cases and 140 mg in the remaining patients (individuals with a BMI of more than 30). All patients were asked to complete three migraine specific Quality of Life questionnaires or Patient Reported Outcome Measures before starting treatment and typically at 3-12 intervals until the end of June 2021 or cessation of treatment. The Patient Reported Outcome Measures included: Headache Impact Test-6, Migraine Associated Disability Assessment test and Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Patients generally only stayed on treatment after 6-12 months if there was deemed to be an improvement of at least 30% and there were no significant side effects. The longest treated cases have quality of life data for 30 months after starting erenumab. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients, 29 (35%) had improvement in Quality of Life scores, with no significant side effects, and wished to stay on treatment. Fifty-three patients (65%) stopped treatment during the first 6-25 months due to lack of efficacy and/or patient reported side effects (n = 33 and n = 17, respectively) or a combination of both, pregnancy planning (n = 2), and lost to follow up (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in Quality of Life scores were recorded by one-third of patients over a period of 11-30 months, with a 35% persistence after a median of 26 months of treatment. This contrasts with our recently published, treatment resistant, chronic migraine cohort where the persistence with erenumab treatment was almost 55% after a median time of 25 months.

Medium-term real-world data for erenumab in 177 treatment resistant or difficult to treat chronic migraine patients: persistence and patient reported outcome measures after 17-30 months.

BACKGROUND: Many migraine patients do not respond adequately to conventional preventive treatments and are therefore described as treatment/medically resistant or difficult to treat cases. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies are a relatively novel molecular treatment for episodic and chronic migraine that have been shown to be effective in short duration clinical trials in approximately 40-50% of all chronic migraine patients. Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROM) or Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires are used to help measure response to treatment in migraine. Although some open label extension studies have become available for erenumab, there is a lack of real-world data pertaining to quality of life in the medium to long-term for chronic and treatment resistant migraine patients. METHODS: A total of 177 treatment resistant CM patients were started on erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks) in our three specialist Headache Clinics. Of these, 174 had their first injection between December 2018 and October 2019. All patients were evaluated with the following PROM: the Headache Impact Test- 6, Migraine Associated Disability Assessment test and Migraine-Specific QoL Questionnaire, before starting treatment with erenumab and at intervals of 3-12 months after starting treatment. The decision to continue treatment was based on subjective clinical improvement of at least 30% (as reported by the patient), supported with diaries and QoL questionnaires. We present here the QoL measurements for this group of 177 patients. Prior preventive migraine treatments included conventional oral prophylactic medications (such as topiramate, candesartan, propranolol, or amitriptyline), at least two cycles of PREEMPT protocol onabotulinumtoxin A or (in a small number of cases) neuromodulation with single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. RESULTS: Of the 177 patients who started treatment with erenumab, 68/177 (38.4%) stopped during the first year, either due to lack of efficacy (no significant benefit or only minimal improvement) and/or possible side effects. 109/177 (61.6%) patients reported clinically significant improvement after 6-12 months and wished to stay on treatment. Twelve of these 109 patients subsequently stopped treatment in the period between 1 year and up to June 2021 (mainly due to a worsening of their migraine). Therefore, a total of 97/177 patients (54.8%) remained on treatment as of June 2021 (duration of treatment 17-30 months, median of 25 months). CONCLUSION: Approximately 55% of treatment resistant or difficult to treat CM patients who trialled erenumab in our clinics reported a subjective benefit and were still on treatment after 17-30 months.

Subclinical myocardial dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients remotely treated with mitoxantrone: evidence of persistent diastolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone is an effective disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS), but its use is limited by cardiotoxicity. We evaluated global myocardial function, including myocardial performance index (MPI), on echocardiography in MS patients after remote mitoxantrone treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n = 50) treated with standard-protocol mitoxantrone from 2002 to 2010 in our center were identified. After exclusion of those who had died (n = 4; all noncardiac) or had developed interim cardiovascular disease or risk factors (n = 3), 33 (mean age 49 ± 11 years, 45% male, median follow-up 77 months, mean cumulative dose 72 mg/m(2)) of the remaining patients (77%) underwent 2-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison group of 17 age- and sex-matched control subjects were included. No significant differences occurred in standard echocardiographic parameters between groups. However, mean MPI (defined as isovolumic contraction time plus isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) divided by ejection time) was significantly higher in patients (0.51 ± 0.12 vs 0.39 ± 0.06; P = .02) owing to a significantly prolonged IVRT (81 ± 25 vs 60 ± 9 ms; P = .04). Overall MPI was >0.5 in 18 patients compared with none of the control subjects (54.5% vs 0%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A subclinical form of global myocardial dysfunction reflecting primarily diastolic dysfunction may be present in MS patients after remote standard-dose mitoxantrone treatment.

Long-term risk of leukaemia or cardiomyopathy after mitoxantrone therapy for multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone has been extensively used as a disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis. However, estimates of the associated risk of therapy-related acute leukaemia and cardiomyopathy have been derived from short-term studies. This study aimed to ascertain the long-term risk of therapy-related acute leukaemia or cardiomyopathy after mitoxantrone therapy for multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2010, 50 patients were treated with mitoxantrone at a single centre using a standard protocol (12 mg/m(2) body surface area monthly for 6 months as tolerated to a maximum of 72 mg/m(2) body surface area). Follow-up haematologic and echocardiographic data were collected in March 2011. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (30%) were excluded from analysis either because of lack of follow-up data, death due to non-cardiac and non-haematologic causes, or comorbid cardiovascular disease. The remaining 35 patients (70%) were followed for a median of 75 months (range: 9-103). The median cumulative mitoxantrone dose given was 72 mg/m(2) body surface area (range: 24-123). At the end of follow-up, no patients had developed therapy-related acute leukaemia. One patient suffered an asymptomatic drop in left ventricular ejection fraction from 55 to 47%. CONCLUSION: This series of patients followed for up to 8.5 years suggests that the risk of either therapy-related acute leukaemia or cardiomyopathy after mitoxantrone therapy for multiple sclerosis is low when patients are treated within standard protocol.