Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs ; 43(3): 130-135, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564455

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals underestimate the recognition of delirium in emergency departments (EDs). In these settings, between 57% and 83% of cases of delirium go undetected. When delirium occurs, it causes an increase in the length of hospitalization, readmissions within 30 days, and mortality. No studies were carried out in Italy to assess the prevalence of delirium among elders in EDs. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of the risk of delirium in people 65 years and older hospitalized in the ED for a minimum of 8 hours. The study's secondary goal was to identify the variables that influenced the risk of delirium. METHOD: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 EDs. The risk of delirium was assessed using the delirium screening tool 4 A's test. One hundred patients were enrolled. Data collection took place from June 28 to August 31, 2022. RESULTS: The risk of delirium was detected in 29% of the sample, whereas the risk of cognitive impairment was 13%. The use of psychotropic drugs increased the risk of delirium by 11.8 times (odds ratio [OR], 11.80; P = .003). Bed confinement increased the risk by 4.3 times (OR, 4.31; P = .009). Being dehydrated increased the risk of onset by 4.6 times (OR, 4.62; P = .010). Having dementia increased the risk of delirium manifestation by 4.4 times (OR, 4.35; P = .021). DISCUSSION: The risk of delirium was detected in a considerable portion of the sample. The results of this study can be used by health care professionals to implement preventive measures as well as support clinical judgment and establish priorities of care for patients at risk of developing delirium.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Humans , Aged , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Hospitalization , Emergency Service, Hospital
2.
Assist Inferm Ric ; 40(4): 213-220, 2021.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35138303

ABSTRACT

. Radial artery occlusion after a radial access procedure: pilot study comparing eco Doppler and Inverse Barbeau Test assessments. INTRODUCTION: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) after a radial access procedure can compromise the distal flow and hamper any possible reuse of the radial artery. Ultrasound examination is the gold standard for identifying RAO, but requires special equipment and expertise. An indirect test to estimate radial flow is the Inverse Barbeau Test (IBT), which evaluates the radial oximetry waveform during ulnar artery compression. AIM: To determine the incidence of RAO and to compare the results obtained with the ultrasound and IBT tests. METHODS: Between November 2017 and February 2018, 50 patients undergoing radial access angiography were enrolled. Radial flow was assessed using both ultrasound and IBT, at three times: before the procedure (T0), at 24 hours (T1) and at 30 days (T2). RESULTS: The incidence of RAO obtained by ultrasound was no cases at T0, 3 (6%) at T1 and 1 (2.4%) at T2. IBT identified 14 (28%), 33 (66%) and 10 (23.8%) cases respectively. Some cases with no occlusion with the ultrasounds, 14 (28%), 30 (60%) and 9 (21.4%) respectively, resulted occluded by IBT. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RAO is comparable to that reported in the literature (<10%). The IBT correctly identifies the presence of flow, but overestimates radial occlusion.


Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases , Radial Artery , Humans , Incidence , Pilot Projects , Radial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Ulnar Artery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...