ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many types of cancer have been found to be associated with being overweight or obese. Literature has demonstrated a reduction in cancer risk in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence and types of new cancer diagnoses, cumulative cancer incidence, cancer risk, and overall survival in patients with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery with that of those who did not. SETTING: Community-based academic medical center. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the rates and types of new incident cancers in a bariatric surgery cohort (Bariatric group) with those of a non-surgical cohort (Comparison group). The Comparison group was chosen from patients who had a clinic visit in our health system within 30 days of each bariatric surgical operation and matched on age, sex, and body mass index. Patients who had a cancer diagnosis prior to having bariatric surgery were excluded from the Bariatric group and patients who had a cancer diagnosis prior to the clinic visit on which they were matched were excluded from the Comparison group. Relative risk of cancer by type was calculated. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for categorical data analysis, and Wilcoxon rank-sum for continuous data. The Kaplan Meier estimator with the log-rank test was used to compare overall survival between groups, while competing risks survival analysis with the Gray test for equality was used to compare cancer incidence in the Surgery group with that in the Comparison group. RESULTS: After matching, the Bariatric group had 1593 patients and the Comparison group had 2156. The Bariatric and Comparison groups had 82 and 222 new incident cancer cases, respectively (P < .001). The 10-year incidence of any new cancer in the Bariatric group was 6.5%, compared with an incidence of 12.1% in the Comparison group (P < .001). Relative risk of cancer in the Bariatric group was lower than that of the Comparison group, with the greatest differences in endometrial (88.8%), kidney (77.4%), thyroid (72.9%), and ductal carcinoma in situ (71.2%) cancers. The 10-year overall survival rate was higher in the Bariatric group than in the Comparison group, 93.3% versus 80.6%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery reduces the risk for developing cancer and offers survival advantage when compared with similar patients who do not undergo bariatric surgery.
Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Neoplasms , Humans , Bariatric Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Adult , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/mortality , Survival RateABSTRACT
Obesity is an independent risk factor for osteoarthritis due to mechanical and inflammatory factors. The gold-standard treatment of end-stage knee and hip osteoarthritis is total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Weight loss decreases progression of osteoarthritis and complications following TJA in patients with obesity. Bariatric surgery allows significant, sustained weight loss and comorbidity resolution in patients with morbid obesity. Existing data describing bariatric surgery on TJA outcomes are limited but suggest a benefit to bariatric surgery prior to TJA. Further studies are needed to determine optimal risk stratification, bariatric procedure selection, and timing of bariatric surgery relative to TJA.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Weight Loss , Comorbidity , Global Health , Humans , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic evaluation is frequently performed before bariatric surgery to identify foregut pathology that may alter procedure selection. Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is an alternative to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The objective of this study was to compare TNE to EGD. METHODS: Patients who underwent TNE or EGD before bariatric surgery from January 2012 through April 2019 were reviewed. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Wilcoxon two-sample, and Fisher's exact tests. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-five patients underwent preoperative screening (63% EGD, 37% TNE) before bariatric surgery. Mean age and preoperative body mass index in the TNE and EGD groups were 46.2 ± 12.4 vs 45.5 ± 11.6 years (p = 0.58) and 46.5 ± 7.1 vs. 45.5 ± 6.1 kg/m2 (p = 0.25), respectively. Three TNEs were aborted, resulting in a success rate of 98%. Of patients who underwent EGD, 1 (0.5%) visited the emergency department (ED), and 7 (3%) called the nurse with post-procedure concerns. There were no ED visits or nurse calls from patients who underwent TNE. The median total time in the procedure room was 77 (57-97) min for EGD vs. 26 (8-33) min for TNE (p < 0.001). One patient who underwent TNE required subsequent EGD. Mean charge per patient for EGD and TNE was $5034.70 and $1464.00, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TNE was associated with less post-procedure care, shorter procedure time and fewer charges compared to EGD. TNE could be considered an initial screening tool for patients undergoing bariatric surgery, while EGD could be used selectively in patients with abnormal TNE findings.
