Ineffective esophageal motility phenotypes following fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is associated with reflux disease, but its natural history is unclear. We evaluated patients undergoing repeat esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) for symptomatic presentations after antireflux surgery (ARS) to understand the progression of IEM. METHODS: Patients with repeat HRM after ARS were included. Ineffective esophageal motility was diagnosed if ≥5 sequences had distal contractile integral (DCI) <450 mmHg cm s. Augmentation of DCI following multiple rapid swallows (MRS) was assessed. The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was interrogated using the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI). Esophageal motor function was compared between patients with and without IEM. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (53.9 ± 1.8 years, 66.2% female) had pre- and post-ARS HRM studies 2.1 ± 0.19 years apart. Esophagogastric junction-CI augmented by a mean of 26.3% following ARS. Four IEM phenotypes were identified: 14.7% had persistent IEM, 8.8% resolved IEM after ARS, 19.1% developed new IEM, and 57.4% had no IEM at any point. Patients with IEM had a lower DCI pre- and post-ARS, lower pre-ARS EGJ CI, and lower pre-ARS-integrated relaxation pressure (p ≤ 0.02 for all comparisons); presenting symptoms and other EGJ metrics were similar (p ≥ 0.08 for all comparisons). The IEM phenotypes could be predicted by MRS DCI response patterns (p = 0.008 across groups); patients with persistent IEM had the least DCI augmentation (p = 0.007 compared to no IEM), while those who resolved IEM had DCI augmentation comparable to no IEM (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Distinct phenotypes of IEM exist among symptomatic reflux patients following ARS. Provocative testing with MRS may help identify these phenotypes pre-ARS.

Exaggerated smooth muscle contraction segments on esophageal high-resolution manometry: prevalence and clinical relevance.

BACKGROUND: Two smooth muscle contraction segments (S2, S3) on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) demonstrate varying contraction vigor in symptomatic patients. Significance of isolated exaggerated smooth muscle contraction remains unclear. METHODS: High-resolution manometry studies were reviewed in 272 consecutive patients (56.4 ± 0.8 years, 62% F) and compared to 21 healthy controls (27.6 ± 0.6 years, 52% F), using HRM tools (distal contractile integral, DCI; distal latency, DL; integrated relaxation pressure, IRP), Chicago Classification (CC) and multiple rapid swallows (MRS). Segments were designated merged when the trough between S2 and S3 was ≥150 mmHg, and exaggerated S3 when peak S3 amplitude was ≥150 mmHg without merging with S2. Presenting symptoms and global symptom severity (on 100 mm visual analog scale) were recorded. Prevalence of merged and exaggerated segments was determined, and characteristics compared to symptomatic patients with normal HRM, and to healthy controls. KEY RESULTS: Merged segments were identified in 5.6%, and exaggerated S3 in another 12.5%, but only 17-50% had a CC diagnosis; one healthy control had merged segments. DCI with wet swallows was similar in cohorts with merged and exaggerated segments (p = 0.7), significantly higher than symptomatic patients with normal HRM and healthy controls (p ≤ 0.003 for each comparison). Incomplete inhibition and prominent DCI augmentation on MRS (p ≤ 0.01), and presenting symptoms (chest pain and dysphagia, p = 0.04) characterized exaggerated segments, but not demographics or symptom burden. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Merged esophageal smooth muscle segments and exaggerated S3 may represent hypermotility phenomena from abnormal inhibition and/or excitation, and are not uniformly identified by the CC algorithm.