Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Eur Radiol ; 28(12): 5182-5194, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29846804

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with standard digital mammography (DM) workup views in the breast cancer assessment clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Tomosynthesis Assessment Clinic trial (TACT), conducted between 16 October 2014 and 19 April 2016, is an ethics-approved, monocenter, multireader, multicase split-plot reading study. After written informed consent was obtained, 144 females (age > 40 years) who were recalled to the assessment clinic were recruited into TACT. These cases (48 cancers) were randomly allocated for blinded review of (1) DM workup and (2) DBT, both in conjunction with previous DM from the screening examination. Fifteen radiologists of varying experience levels in the Australia BreastScreen Program were included in this study, wherein each radiologist read 48 cases (16 cancers) in 3 non-overlapping blocks. Diagnostic accuracy was measured by means of sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). The receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine radiologists' performances. RESULTS: Use of DBT (AUC = 0.927) led to improved performance of the radiologists (z = 2.62, p = 0.008) compared with mammography workup (AUC = 0.872). Similarly, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DBT (0.93, 0.75, 0.64, 0.96) were higher than those of the workup (0.90, 0.56, 0.49, 0.92). Most radiologists (80%) performed better with DBT than standard workup. Cancerous lesions on DBT appeared more severe (U = 33,172, p = 0.02) and conspicuous (U = 24,207, p = 0.02). There was a significant reduction in the need for additional views (χ2 = 17.63, p < 0.001) and recommendations for ultrasound (χ2 = 8.56, p = 0.003) with DBT. CONCLUSIONS: DBT has the potential to increase diagnostic accuracy and simplify the assessment process in the breast cancer assessment clinic. KEY POINTS: • Use of DBT in the assessment clinic results in increased diagnostic accuracy. • Use of DBT in the assessment clinic improves performance of radiologists and also increases the confidence in their decisions. • DBT may reduce the need for additional views, ultrasound imaging, and biopsy.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mammography/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Australia/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , ROC Curve
2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 18(9): 2425-2430, 2017 09 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28952021

ABSTRACT

Objective: Mammographic density (MD) is a significant risk factor for breast cancer and an important determinant for establishing efficiency of any screening program. Currently, the distribution and influential factors of MD is unknown among Mongolian women. This work aims to characterize MD of Mongolian women. Methods: The ethical approval was obtained from Research Ethics Board of the University of Sydney (2014/973) and National Ethic Committee from Ministry of Mongolia (2015/04). We recruited 1985 women aged 16-83 from the National Cancer Center in Mongolia for whom MD and age of each woman was known. From this total group, 983 women also had additional available details on height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and area of residency. We investigated the association of each of these variables with breast density, which was assessed by using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) lexicon. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to explore the importance of these variables as predictors of MD. Results: Category B (33%) was the most common type of MD, whereas 25%, 18% and 24% of women belonged to the category A, C and D respectively. The univariate analysis demonstrated that, younger women had more dens breasts than their older counterparts (OR=6.8). Also, increased MD was significantly (p<0.05) associated with decreased weight (OR=4.5), increased height (OR=0.4) and lower BMI (OR=13.2). Urban women had significantly higher MD compared with rural counterparts (OR=2.2). In the multivariate analysis, 75% of variation in MD was explained by age (OR=4.5) and BMI (OR=7.3). Conclusion: A high proportion of Mongolian women have very high density breasts and age and body size are key factors determining MD among these women.

3.
Clin Radiol ; 72(6): 433-442, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28185635

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide; however, early diagnosis of lung cancer leads to higher survival rates. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated that scanning with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) led to a 20% reduction in mortality rate in a high-risk population. This paper covers new developments in screening eligibility criteria and the possible benefits and the harm of screening with CT. To make the screening process more feasible and help reduce the rate of missed lung nodules, computer-aided detection (CAD) has been introduced to assist radiologists in lung nodule detection. The aim of this paper is to review how CAD works, its performance in lung nodule detection, and the factors that influence its performance. This paper also aims to investigate the effect of different types of CAD on CT in lung nodule detection and the effect of CAD on radiologists' decision outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 173(4): 374-379, 2017 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908924

ABSTRACT

This study examines radiation dose levels delivered to children from birth to 15 y of age in the investigation of congenital heart disease (CHD) at a major Sydney children's hospital. The aims are to compare values with those derived from similar studies, to provide a template for more consistent dose reporting, to establish local and national diagnostic reference levels and to contribute to the worldwide paediatric dosimetry database. A retrospective review of 1007 paediatric procedural records was undertaken. The cohort consisted of 795 patients over a period from January 2007 to December 2012 who have undergone cardiac catheterisation for the investigation of CHD. The age range included was from the day of birth to 15 y. Archived dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) readings were retrieved and analysed. The mean, median, 25th and 75th percentile DAP levels were calculated for six specific age groupings. The 75th percentile DAP values for the specific age categories were as follows: 0-30 d-1.9 Gy cm2, 1-12 months-2.9 Gy cm2, 1-3 y-5.3 Gy cm2, 3-5 y-6.2 Gy cm2, 5-10 y-7.5 Gy cm2 and 10-15 y-17.3 Gy cm2. These levels were found to be lower than the values reported in comparable overseas studies. Individual year-specific levels were determined, and it is proposed that these are more useful than the common grouping method. The age-specific 75th percentile DAP levels outlined in this study can be used as baseline local diagnostic reference levels. The needs for the standardisation of DAP reporting and for a greater range of age-specific diagnostic reference levels have been highlighted. For the first time, Australian dose values for paediatric cardiac catheterisation are presented.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Australia , Child , Heart Diseases/congenital , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies
5.
Br J Radiol ; 87(1039): 20140029, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24814694

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of the insertion of less-difficult malignant cases on subsequent breast cancer detection by breast imaging radiologists. METHODS: The research comprises two studies. Study 1: 8 radiologists read 2 sets of images each consisting of 40 mammographic cases. Set A contained four abnormal cases, and Set B contained six abnormal cases, including two priming cases (less difficult malignancies) placed at intervals of three and five subsequent cases before a subtle cancer. Study 2: 16 radiologists read a third condition of the same cases, known as Set C, containing six abnormal cases and two priming cases immediately preceding the subtle cancer cases. The readers were asked to localize malignancies and give confidence ratings on decisions. RESULTS: Although not significant, a decrease in performance was observed in Set B compared with in Set A. There was a significant increase in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (z = -2.532; p = 0.0114) and location sensitivity (z = -2.128; p = 0.0333) between the first and second halves of Set A and a marginal improvement in jackknife free-response ROC figure of merit (z = -1.89; p = 0.0587) between the first and second halves of Set B. In Study 2, Set C yielded no significant differences between the two halves of the study. CONCLUSION: Overall findings show no evidence that priming with lower difficulty malignant cases affects the detection of higher difficulty cancers; however, performance may decrease with priming. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This research suggests that inserting additional malignant cases in screening mammography sets as an audit tool may potentially lead to a decrease in performance of experienced breast radiologists.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Clinical Competence , Mammography/standards , Repetition Priming , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Mental Recall , Perception , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Task Performance and Analysis
6.
Clin Radiol ; 69(4): 333-41, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24424328

ABSTRACT

Effective detection of breast cancer using mammography is an important public health issue worldwide. Breasts that contain higher levels of fibroglandular compared with fatty tissue increase breast radio-opacity making it more difficult to differentiate between normal and abnormal findings. The higher prevalence of breast cancer amongst women with denser breasts demands the origination of effective solutions to manage this common radiographic appearance. This brief review considers the impact of higher levels of density on cancer detection and the importance of digital technology in possibly reducing the negative effects of increased density.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Mammography , Mass Screening , Pattern Recognition, Automated , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Adipose Tissue , Australia/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Prevalence , Public Health , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Br J Radiol ; 79 Spec No 2: S111-6, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17209115

ABSTRACT

Radiologists make the decision to report or dismiss a possible cancer based not only on the finding itself, but also in the comparison with selected areas of the background. We examined the effects of fixating, for the first time, the location where the radiologist either reported the presence of a malignant mass or visually inspected the mass but did not report it, and the effects of pairing radiologists to read the same cases. Four experienced mammographers participated in this experiment. They read a set of 20 cases twice. Eye-position tracking was used to monitor the visual search behaviour of the observers. Spatial frequency analysis was used to determine the characteristics of the areas of the background fixated by the observers. Radiologists had more fixations in the cases where they agreed how to manage the lesion than when they disagreed. Correlation between the areas of the background sampled by the radiologists and an "average" representation of the background increased after the observers fixated for the first time a malignant mass that they reported. Fixating, for the first time, a location where the radiologist reports a malignant mass or a location containing a cancer that the radiologist visually inspects but decides not to report, has a significant effect on any further sampling of the background. Furthermore, care should be taken when pairing radiologists, because some observers showed such a similar visual search behaviour that not much would be gained by having them read the same cases.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Clinical Competence/standards , Mammography/standards , Decision Making , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Radiology
8.
J Digit Imaging ; 14(3): 117-23, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11720333

ABSTRACT

In this pilot study the authors examined areas on a mammogram that attracted the visual attention of experienced mammographers and mammography fellows, as well as areas that were reported to contain a malignant lesion, and, based on their spatial frequency spectrum, they characterized these areas by the type of decision outcome that they yielded: true-positives (TP), false-positives (FP), true-negatives (TN), and false-negatives (FN). Five 2-view (craniocaudal and medial-lateral oblique) mammogram cases were examined by 8 experienced observers, and the eye position of the observers was tracked. The observers were asked to report the location and nature of any malignant lesions present in the case. The authors analyzed each area in which either the observer made a decision or in which the observer had prolonged (>1,000 ms) visual dwell using wavelet packets, and characterized these areas in terms of the energy contents of each spatial frequency band. It was shown that each decision outcome is characterized by a specific profile in the spatial frequency domain, and that these profiles are significantly different from one another. As a consequence of these differences, the profiles can be used to determine which type of decision a given observer will make when examining the area. Computer-assisted perception correctly predicted up to 64% of the TPs made by the observers, 77% of the FPs, and 70% of the TNs.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Errors , Mammography , Depth Perception , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Mammography/standards , Observer Variation , Pilot Projects , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
Radiology ; 221(1): 122-9, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11568329

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether unreported retrospectively identified cancers on mammograms receive prolonged visual attention and can be reliably detected in a blinded review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four experienced mammographers performed a blinded review of a test set of 20 retrospective cases where the cancer was not detected until the next mammographic evaluation, 10 prospective cases where the cancer was initially detected, and 10 cancer-free cases. Two views were digitized and displayed on a workstation. The experiment consisted of an initial impression, during which eye position was monitored, and a final impression, during which viewers zoomed on regions of interest and localized suspicious lesions. Eye-position data were analyzed to determine whether retrospectively visible cancers attracted attention to the same degree as prospectively visible cancers. The initial impression used 1,000 msec as the eye-fixation dwell criterion for detecting a lesion. RESULTS: Initially, 70% of retrospective cancers and 50% of prospective cancers did not attract prolonged visual attention. In prospective cases, detailed examination significantly improved the mean receiver operating characteristic area, from.73 to.88 (P <.01), but in retrospective cases, the mean receiver operating characteristic area barely increased, from.60 to.68, due to a high true-positive-to-false-positive ratio. CONCLUSION: At blinded review, detection of retrospectively visible cancers was significantly inferior to that of prospective cancers. It cannot be assumed that retrospectively identified cancers are intrinsically detectable, because they do not draw prolonged visual attention during visual search for breast cancers.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Mammography/methods , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
10.
Acad Radiol ; 6(10): 575-85, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10516859

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the influence of perceptual and cognitive skills in mammography detection and interpretation by testing three groups representing different levels of mammography expertise in terms of experience, training, and talent with a mammography screening-diagnostic task. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty mammograms, composed of unilateral cranial-caudal and mediolateral oblique views, were displayed in pairs on a digital workstation to 19 radiology residents, three experienced mammographers, and nine mammography technologists. One-third of the mammograms showed malignant lesions; two-thirds were malignancy-free. Observers interacted with the display to indicate whether each image contained no malignant lesions or suspicious lesions indicating malignancy. Decision time was measured as the lesions were localized, classified, and rated for decision confidence. RESULTS: Compared with performance of experts, alternative free response operating characteristic performance for residents was significantly lower and equivalent to that of technologists. Analysis of overall performance showed that, as level of expertise decreased, false-positive results exerted a greater effect on overall decision accuracy over the time course of image perception. This defines the decision speed-accuracy relationship that characterizes mammography expertise. CONCLUSION: Differences in resident performance resulted primarily from lack of perceptual-learning experience during mammography training, which limited object recognition skills and made it difficult to determine differences between malignant lesions, benign lesions, and normal image perturbations. A proposed solution is systematic mentor-guided training that links image perception to feedback about the reasons underlying decision making.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Clinical Competence , Mammography , Radiology/education , Analysis of Variance , Humans , Internship and Residency , Linear Models , Psychomotor Performance , ROC Curve , Task Performance and Analysis , Technology, Radiologic/education , User-Computer Interface , Visual Perception
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...