Measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese anterior cruciate ligament - return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale short version after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Higher scores (closer to 100) on the Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale indicate better psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). OBJECTIVES: To verify the validity and reliability of the ACL-RSI-short version (ACL-RSI-SV) in Brazilian Portuguese in individuals who underwent ACLR. METHODS: Participants (n=168) answered the Brazilian versions of ACL-RSI, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) to assess the convergent validity of the short version. Internal consistency was also verified through correlation between items. Scores of participants who did not return to sport, who returned at a lower level, and at the pre-injury level were compared to verify divergent validity. ACL-RSI was answered again after 5-8 days to verify test-retest reliability. RESULTS: ACL-RSI-SV in Brazilian Portuguese showed good test-retest reliability (ICC2.1 = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.90) and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were 4.98 and 13.82. High positive correlation was found with the full version of the ACL-RSI (r=0.93, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.95), moderate positive correlation with the IKDC (r=0.52, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.62), and weak negative correlation with the TSK-17 (r = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.60, -0.28). It also presented good divergent validity to identify individuals who returned to sport. CONCLUSION: ACL-RSI-SV in Brazilian Portuguese is a consistent, valid, and reliable instrument to assess patients who have undergone ACLR, with good ability to identify those who return to sport.

Clinical Decision Algorithm Associated With Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Understanding the factors that predict return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction facilitates clinical decision making. OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical decision algorithm that could predict RTS and non-RTS based on the differences in the variables after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 150 athletes in any sport involving deceleration, jumping, cutting, or turning enrolled in the study. All participants answered the International Knee Documentation Committee and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) questionnaires and performed balance and isokinetic tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The classification and regression tree (CART) was used to determine the clinical decision algorithm associated with RTS at any level and RTS at the preinjury level. The diagnostic accuracy of the CART was verified. RESULTS: Of the 150 participants, 57.3% (n = 86) returned to sport at any level and 12% (n = 18) returned to sport at the preinjury level. The interactions among the peak torque extension at 300°/s >93.55 Nm, ACL-RSI score >27.05 (P = .06), and postoperative time >7.50 months were associated with RTS at any level identified by CART and were factors associated with RTS. An ACL-RSI score >72.85% was the main variable associated with RTS at the preinjury level. The interaction among an ACL-RSI score of 50.40% to 72.85%, agonist : antagonist ratio at 300°/s ≤63.6%, and anteroposterior stability index ≤2.4 in these participants was the second factor associated with RTS at the preinjury level. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes who had more quadriceps strength tended to RTS at any level more quickly, even with less-than-expected psychological readiness. Regarding a return at the preinjury level, psychological readiness was the most important factor in not returning, followed by a better agonist : antagonist ratio and better balance.

Hand-held dynamometer identifies asymmetries in torque of the quadriceps muscle after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To verify the validity and diagnostic accuracy of the hand-held dynamometer (HHD) with the isokinetic dynamometer for evaluating the quadriceps strength of subjects who have undergone ACL reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: This validity and diagnostic accuracy study was conducted prospectively by examining 70 consecutive participants who had undergone ACLR at least 6 months previously. All participants performed strength evaluation of the quadriceps muscle using the HHD and isokinetic dynamometer. RESULTS: The HHD presented high test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.98], moderate to good validity with the isokinetic dynamometer when compared for the quadriceps strength (r = 0.62), 100% perfect specificity [LR + infinity, 95% confidence interval (CI) 81.4%-100%] to identify those with LSI > 10%, and a sensitivity of 63.4% (48.9%-76.3%). CONCLUSION: The HHD is an instrument valid and reliable of low cost and easy handling compared to the isokinetic dynamometer to evaluate the quadriceps torque and the limb symmetry index after the ACLR with high diagnostic accuracy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.