Management of prediabetes from the perspective of Spanish physicians and community pharmacists: Detecta2 study.

INTRODUCTION: Prediabetes is a high-risk state for diabetes. The study aims to describe routine clinical practice and the views of physicians and pharmacists on prediabetes management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 410 physicians and 393 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. Self-adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was reported by 51.5% and 23.2% of physicians and pharmacists, respectively. Less than 60% of participants defined prediabetes according to main CPG. Regarding the use of screening strategies to detect prediabetes (physicians: 96%; pharmacists: 42.1%), reports indicate the opportunistic strategy is widely employed (≥75%) whereas systematic screening is unusual (<20%). Changes in lifestyle were deemed essential by almost all participants (≥95%), but in clinical practice only 58.3% of healthcare centers and 28.0% of pharmacies were found to provide awareness-raising/instruction. The role of pharmacists in the prevention of prediabetes/diabetes was judged useful by most participants. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CPG, systematic prediabetes screening strategies, and specific strategies for patient education are scarce. The support of community pharmacists in prediabetes management was well valued. Therefore, it is crucial that the lines of action followed by both physicians and pharmacists align with each other and with the CPG.

Management of prediabetes from the perspective of Spanish physicians and community pharmacists: Detecta2 study.

INTRODUCTION: Prediabetes is a high-risk state for diabetes. The study aims to describe routine clinical practice and the views of physicians and pharmacists on prediabetes management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 410 physicians and 393 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. Self-adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was reported by 51.5% and 23.2% of physicians and pharmacists, respectively. Less than 60% of participants defined prediabetes according to main CPG. Regarding the use of screening strategies to detect prediabetes (physicians: 96%; pharmacists: 42.1%), reports indicate the opportunistic strategy is widely employed (≥75%) whereas systematic screening is unusual (<20%). Changes in lifestyle were deemed essential by almost all participants (≥95%), but in clinical practice only 58.3% of healthcare centers and 28.0% of pharmacies were found to provide awareness-raising/instruction. The role of pharmacists in the prevention of prediabetes/diabetes was judged useful by most participants. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CPG, systematic prediabetes screening strategies, and specific strategies for patient education are scarce. The support of community pharmacists in prediabetes management was well valued. Therefore, it is crucial that the lines of action followed by both physicians and pharmacists align with each other and with the CPG.

Breakthrough cancer pain treatment in Spain: physicians' perception of current opioids utilization and prescription.

Objectives: Multiple reasons for suboptimal treatment of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) have been reported in the literature. We aimed to ascertain the perception of physicians on the potential inappropriate use and prescription of rapid-onset opioids (ROOs) for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) and the causes thereof.Methods: Observational study based on an online survey addressed to doctors from different specialties (radiation oncology, medical oncology, anesthesia, palliative care and general practitioners) with experience in the management of BTcP in the Spanish public health setting.Results: A total of 114 eligible specialists mainly from radiation oncology (37.7%), medical oncology (24.6%) and pain units (18.4%) participated in the study. Most agreed on important aspects of BTcP management, such as their preference for ROOs or the need for early follow-up after treatment initiation. However, their answers revealed a lack of standardization of BTcP diagnosis. Half of respondents believed that their BTcP patients might misuse ROOs. Physicians polled believed that lack of training in pain management (71.9%) and inadequate BTcP diagnosis and evaluation (66.7%) were the greatest obstacles for prescribing opioids. Specialists also thought that they do not provide the necessary information to patients (51.8%) and caregivers (57.9%) to guarantee the correct use of these drugs.Conclusions: These results are of utmost importance as they highlight the need to increase physicians' awareness of BTcP and its management and the need to improve communication with patients and their caregivers. Our findings also indicate the need for future research on the possible misuse of opioids in BTcP patients and its causes.

Physicians' and Pharmacists' Clinical Considerations for Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The IMPLICA2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Management of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is complex due to their age-related conditions. Several clinical guidelines provide specific recommendations for management of these patients but little is known about their implementation in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To describe physician and community pharmacist perceptions and routine clinical practice in the management of elderly T2DM patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. RESULTS: A total of 993 physicians and 999 community pharmacists completed the questionnaire. More physicians than pharmacists agreed on the need to establish more flexible HbA1c targets for elderly (79.4% vs. 30.6%; p < 0.001) and frail (92.6% vs. 31.4%; p < 0.001) patients than for the general diabetic population. HbA1c targets < 7.5% for elderly patients and < 8.5% for frail patients (as recommended by the principle guidelines) were set by 38.9% and 28.7% of physicians, respectively. Furthermore, 62.8% of physicians stated they follow guideline recommendations but, based on their prescription decisions for hypothetical patients, less than 50% were aligned with them. In addition, 73.1% of physicians monitor treatment adherence, mainly by using dispensing control (59.1%). Specific nutritional approaches for elderly patients are provided by 62.9% of physicians and 56.0% of pharmacists, whilst 57.4% and 21.7%, respectively, deliver specific physical exercise programs. CONCLUSIONS: Low adherence to guideline recommendations (i.e. setting more stringent HbA1c targets or delaying treatment intensification) may lead to suboptimal glycaemic control in elderly patients. The standardization of processes, extensive monitoring of patient treatment adherence and providing advice regarding specific personal lifestyle habits may improve the management of elderly T2DM patients.

Revisión sistemática sobre instrumentos de valoración de la imaginación motora para población hispanohablante: su uso en rehabilitación / Systematic review of Spanish outcome measures on motor imagery ability: use in physical rehabilitation

Introducción. La imaginación motora es el acto de imaginar una acción sin realizar el movimiento físico. Su práctica acelera el aprendizaje y mejora las destrezas motrices. Previamente a la rehabilitación física utilizando la imaginación motora, es necesario evaluar la capacidad de los individuos para formar y manipular imágenes mentales. Esta revisión sistemática analiza las propiedades psicométricas de las herramientas existentes que miden la imaginación motora en la comunidad hispanohablante y discute su utilidad clínica en personas con discapacidad motora. Materiales y métodos. Se hallaron 19 artículos en diferentes bases de datos, y se aplicó la escala COSMIN para evaluar los 17 instrumentos de medida hallados sobre imaginación mental. El criterio utilizado para graduar la utilidad clínica de estas herramientas fue establecido en función de la modalidad sensorial evaluada. Resultados. La calidad metodológica de los estudios fue aceptable en términos de fiabilidad y validez. Cuatro cuestionarios se consideraron de utilidad alta en imaginación motora. El Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ) (alfa = 0,90; AFE = 2) y su versión revisada (MIQ-R) (alfa = 0,84; AFE=2) son los cuestionarios autoadministrables que mejor se ajustan para evaluar la imaginación motora en la población hispanohablante. Entre los tests espaciales es posible utilizar la medida de la aptitud para formar imágenes mentales espaciales (alfa = 0,93) o la medida de la aptitud para rotar imágenes mentales (alfa = 0,90). Conclusiones. Aunque el MIQ y el MIQ-R evalúan la imaginación visual y cinestésica, su aplicación en la rehabilitación con personas con discapacidad motora es complicada. Actualmente no hay instrumentos validados en castellano para población con discapacidad física (AU)

Introduction. Motor imagery is a mental representation of movement without any body movement and its training accelerates motor learning and improves motor skills. A thorough understanding of how to manipulate mental images is necessary before using motor imagery in physical rehabilitation. This systematic review analyzes the psychometric properties of the outcome measures on motor imagery ability for the Spanish-speaking people and discusses its usefulness in people with motor disabilities. Materials and methods. A review was conducted, using the COSMIN checklist to appraise 19 articles on measurement properties of motor imagery ability assessments found in reviewed databases. The criteria for grading the usefulness of instruments to measure motor imagery was established depending on the sensory modality assessed. We found 17 questionnaires. Results. Methodological quality was mostly fair in reliability and validity. Four tests have been considered highly useful in assessing motor imagery. MIQ (alfa = 0.90; EFA=2) and MIQ-R (alfa = 0.84; EFA=2) are the best suited to evaluate motor imagery in Spanish-speaking population. To handle spatial images, MASMI (alfa = 0.93) or MARMI (alfa = 0.90) tests may be more beneficial. Conclusions. MIQ and MIQ-R evaluate visual and kinesthetic imagery, but these are difficult to use in the physical rehabilitation of people with motor disabilities. Currently, there are no valid Spanish translations of studies regarding motor imagery outcome measures for people with disabilities (AU)