Inferior Pancreaticoduodenal Artery Pseudoaneurysm Causing Biliary Obstruction: A Case Report.

Introduction: Visceral arterial aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms are rare but dangerous pathologies, with reported incidence of 0.01-0.2% of the worldwide population, as found on autopsy. Pancreaticoduodenal artery pathology accounts for approximately 2% of all visceral aneurysms; it is commonly caused by chronic inflammatory processes, such as pancreatitis or adjacent pseudocysts. Morbidity and mortality commonly result from rupture of the aneurysm itself, leading to life-threatening hemorrhage into the peritoneum or gastrointestinal tract. Case Report: Here we present the case of a 64-year-old male patient with previous history of alcohol use disorder leading to chronic pancreatitis and prior embolization of an inferior pancreaticoduodenal pseudoaneurysm, who presented to the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, and was found to have a large recurrent inferior pancreaticoduodenal pseudoaneurysm with associated obstructive cholangitis and pancreatitis via contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis. The patient was managed emergently by interventional radiology angiography with embolic coiling and percutaneous biliary catheter placement, and he subsequently underwent biliary duct stenting with gastroenterology. The patient was successfully discharged after a brief hospitalization after resolution of his pancreatitis and associated hyperbilirubinemia. Conclusion: Pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms are rare and dangerous visceral pathologies. Patients can be diagnosed rapidly in the ED with CT imaging and need urgent endovascular management to prevent morbidity and mortality.

A Case Report of Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum From an Unusual Cause: Baritone Practice.

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM) is a rare but potentially life-threatening clinical entity in which free air is introduced into the mediastinum. It most commonly presents in young males and has an incidence of approximately 0.002% of the general population. Symptoms include sudden onset chest pain, dyspnea, neck pain, vomiting, and odynophagia. Physical examination usually reveals subcutaneous emphysema, hoarse voice, tachycardia, tachypnea, and occasionally a Hamman's sign, which is a mediastinal "crunch" sound heard on cardiac auscultation. We present a case of an 18-year-old male baritone player who presented to the ED with chest pain and odynophagia shortly after waking up one morning. The patient's chest radiograph (CXR) revealed free air in the mediastinum with subcutaneous air tracking into the soft tissues of the neck and supraclavicular region. CT of the chest with contrast esophagram confirmed the diagnosis of primary SPM. The cause of his condition was likely due to barotrauma secondary to playing the baritone in his marching band. He had no evidence of esophageal injury or infectious process which further supports the diagnosis of primary SPM. After an extensive workup, the patient was discharged from the ED with instructions on rest, analgesia, and antitussives as needed. Evaluation of chest pain patients in the ED should include a CXR, in addition to other indicated tests, to rule out this potentially debilitating condition. Fortunately, though SPM is potentially life-threatening, most cases resolve spontaneously without surgical intervention.

Acute Chest Syndrome.

Audience: Emergency medicine residents and medical students on emergency medicine rotations. Introduction: Acute chest syndrome is a life-threatening, potentially catastrophic complication of sickle cell disease.1,2 It occurs in approximately 50% of patients with sickle cell disease, with up to 13% all-cause mortality.1 Most common in children aged 2-4, up to 80% of patients with a prior diagnosis of acute chest syndrome will have recurrence of this syndrome.4 Diagnostic criteria include a new infiltrate on pulmonary imaging combined with any of the following: fever > 38.5°C (101.3°F), cough, wheezing, hypoxemia (PaO2 < 60 mm Hg), tachypnea, or chest pain.4,5 The pathophysiology of acute chest syndrome involves vaso-occlusion in pulmonary vessels resulting in hypoxia, release of inflammatory mediators, acidosis, and infarction of lung tissue. The most common precipitants are infections (viral or bacterial), rib infarction, and fat emboli.1,2,4 Patients commonly present with fever, dyspnea, cough, chills, chest pain, or hemoptysis. Diagnosis is made through physical exam, blood work, and chest imaging.1,2 Chest radiograph is considered the gold standard for imaging modality.3 Management of acute chest syndrome includes hydration with IV crystalloid solutions, antibiotics, judicious analgesia, oxygen, and, in severe cases, transfusion.6 Emergency medicine practitioners should keep acute chest syndrome as a cannot miss, high consequence differential diagnosis for all patients with sickle cell disease presenting to the Emergency Department. Educational Objectives: At the end of this oral board session, examinees will: 1) demonstrate the ability to obtain a complete medical history; 2) demonstrate the ability to perform a detailed physical examination in a patient with respiratory distress; 3) identify a patient with respiratory distress and hypoxia and manage appropriately (administer oxygen, place patient on monitor); 4) investigate the broad differential diagnoses which include acute chest syndrome, pneumonia, acute coronary syndrome, acute congestive heart failure, acute aortic dissection and acute pulmonary embolism; 5) list the appropriate laboratory and imaging studies to differentiate acute chest syndrome from other diagnoses (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), lactic acid, procalcitonin, EKG, troponin level, d-dimer, chest radiograph); 6) identify a patient with acute chest syndrome and manage appropriately (administer intravenous pain medications, administer antibiotics after obtaining blood cultures, emergent consultation with hematology) and 7) provide appropriate disposition to the intensive care unit after consultation with hematology. Educational Methods: This case is used as a method to assess learners' ability to rapidly assess a patient in respiratory distress. The learner needs to address a limited differential diagnosis list while simultaneously stabilizing and treating the patient. The "patient" becomes an active participant in the case, with repeated requests for pain medication, and appropriate analgesic administration is required as a critical action. For faculty, this case is used to assist with periodic assessment of resident performance while in the emergency department (ED).We use oral board testing as one additional tool to assess residents' critical thinking, while still applying the pressure that is needed to pass the oral certification examination. Large groups of residents can be assessed in short periods of time without needing to "wait" for this particular patient presentation to be seen in the ED.In this case, learners were assessed using a free online evaluation tool, Google forms. Multiple questions were written for each critical action, and the Google form served as the online evaluation and repository of this information. The critical actions of the case were then tied to Emergency Medicine Milestones, and the results were compiled for use during resident clinical competency evaluations. Residents were provided with immediate feedback of their performance and were also given their electronic evaluations when requested. Research Methods: To assess the strengths and weaknesses of the case, learners and instructors were given the opportunity to provide electronic feedback after the case was completed. Subsequent modifications were made based on the feedback provided. Additionally, learners answered written multiple-choice questions after the case to assess for retention of the material. Results: Senior and junior residents alike enjoyed the process of an oral board simulation as an alternative to a more formal lecture. Seniors also stated that they felt more confident with their ability to pass the oral certification examination after having gone through oral board testing while in residency. Overall, the case was rated relatively highly, with residents scoring the case as 4.3 ± 0.186, 95% confidence interval (1-5 Likert scale, 5 being excellent, n=53) after their assessment was completed. Discussion: Students and residents who participated in the oral board exam formatting found this to be preferable to a traditional lecture and enjoyed the learning environment. Faculty also found this type of participation to be more engaging and were pleased with the ability to perform high-stress assessments with low stakes. The content contained in the case is relevant to all emergency medicine trainees, and this formatting forces the learner to be an active participant in the learning session. The case is a good model for the high-stakes testing of the oral certification exam and is an effective way to test a resident's ability to rapidly assess and manage a life-threatening condition in the ED. Topics: Sickle cell anemia, vaso-occlusive pain crisis, acute chest syndrome, hypoxia, pneumonia, sepsis.

Refeeding Syndrome in Emergency Department Boarders: How COVID-19 Can Reshape Patient Care in the Emergency Department.

Emergency departments (EDs) in the United States are the primary drivers of hospital admissions. As the nation continues to experience unrestrained spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), EDs, hospitals, and testing centers are overwhelmed with patients. The consequence of "boarding" admitted patients in EDs leads not only to longer ED wait times for all patients but also delays the medical practice of intensivists and internists while patients await an inpatient bed. Here, we describe the case of an ED boarder with severe COVID-19 who developed refeeding syndrome while boarding in the ED, ultimately requiring in-depth electrolyte and renal management by the ED team before intensive care unit admission.

3rd-Degree Atrioventricular Block.

Audience: This oral boards case is appropriate for emergency medicine residents and medical students on emergency medicine rotations. Introduction/Background: Third-degree heart block (also known as complete heart block) is a cardiovascular emergency that requires prompt recognition. Complete heart block is a type of atrioventricular (AV) block whereby no atrial impulses reach the ventricular conduction system. The most common etiology of AV block is ischemic heart disease, with up to 1 in 5 patients developing some type of conduction disturbance after an MI.1 Complete heart block is seen in 8% of patients post-MI.2 Other causes include myocarditis, infectious endocarditis, infiltrative cardiac disease, congenital AV blocks, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, electrolyte disturbances, and drug side effects.3 In complete heart block, the heart rate is dependent on the location of the block and a functioning secondary pacemaker within the conduction system. Analysis of the EKG will determine the location of this escape rhythm. For escape rhythms originating at the AV node or high in the His-Purkinje system, the QRS complex will typically be narrow, and the ventricular rate typically in the 40-60 bpm range. For blocks with ventricular escape rhythms, the QRS will appear wide, with rates of 20-40 bpm. Patients presenting with 3rd-degree AVB with ventricular escape rhythms can destabilize. If no escape rhythm generates, patients develop asystole and cardiac arrest. Since 1 in 600 adults over the age of 65 will develop a form of supraventricular conduction abnormality each year, this disease process is important to identify and treat.4 Effective management includes accurate interpretation of a 12-lead EKG, assessment of hemodynamic stability and systemic perfusion, and time-sensitive pharmacologic or procedural intervention. Educational Objectives: At the end of this oral board session, examinees will: 1) demonstrate ability to obtain a complete medical history including detailed cardiac history, 2) demonstrate the ability to perform a detailed physical examination in a patient with cardiac complaints, 3) investigate the broad differential diagnoses which include acute coronary syndrome (ACS), electrolyte imbalances, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, aortic dissection and arrhythmias, 4) obtain and interpret the cardiac monitor rhythm strip to identify complete heart block, 5) list the appropriate laboratory and imaging studies to differentiate arrhythmia from other diagnoses (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, magnesium level, EKG, troponin level, chest radiograph), 6) identify a patient with complete heart block and manage appropriately (administer IV atropine, attempt transcutaneous pacing, place a transvenous pacemaker, emergent consultation with interventional cardiology), 7) provide appropriate disposition to intensive care after consultation with interventional cardiologist. Educational Methods: This is a straight-forward case which was written to assess learners' ability to rapidly recognize an unstable cardiac rhythm and to subsequently treat and stabilize the patient. Oral board testing is used as a proxy for the emergency department (ED) and can assist with periodic assessment of resident performance while in the ED.We have found that oral board testing is a useful tool to assess residents' critical thinking while still applying pressure that is needed to pass the examination itself. Large groups of residents can be assessed in a short time period without needing to "wait" for a particular clinical condition to present to the ED.In this case, learners were assessed using a free online evaluation tool, ie, Google forms. Multiple questions were written for each critical action, and the Google form served as the online evaluation and repository. The critical actions of the case were then tied to Emergency Medicine Milestones, and the results were compiled for use during residency clinical competency evaluations. Residents were provided with immediate verbal feedback of their performance and were also given their electronic evaluations when requested. Research Methods: Learners and instructors were given the opportunity to provide electronic feedback after the case was completed to assess strengths and weaknesses, and subsequent modifications were made. Additionally, learners answered written multiple-choice questions after the case to assess for retention of the material. Results: Senior learners found this to be a more enjoyable way to refresh their skills than direct lecture. Junior residents and students who encountered this clinical entity first in the oral board rather than in the ED, stated that they enjoyed the ability to "trial run" the case before being faced with an emergent and uncontrolled setting of the ED. Overall, the learners rated the case as 4.7 (1-5 Likert scale, 5 being excellent) after the mock oral board examination was completed. Discussion: Students and residents who were assessed with a mock oral board session found this to be an improvement over traditional "lecture" and were pleased to have participated. The content is highly relevant to emergency medicine and the format forces learners to be actively engaged in review of the material. The case is a good model for the high stakes testing of written and oral board examinations, and is an effective way to assess a resident's ability to rapidly assess and manage a life-threatening condition in the ED. Topics: Third-degree AV block, complete heart block, 3rd-degree block, hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, cardiovascular emergency.

Eclampsia.

Audience: Emergency medicine residents and medical students on emergency medicine rotations. Introduction: Eclampsia is an uncommon but important life-threatening obstetrical emergency, complicating 1.5-10 deliveries per 10,000 pregnancies in resource-rich countries.1 If not recognized and treated promptly, there is risk of significant morbidity or death to both mother and baby. Clinically, eclampsia is defined by new-onset seizures or coma in women with preeclampsia.2 Preeclampsia is defined by maternal hypertension after 20 weeks gestation with or without signs of end organ dysfunction, and, like eclampsia, can develop in the postpartum period.1 Eclampsia manifests as new onset generalized tonicclonic seizures. Eclamptic seizures are usually preceded by neurologic symptoms such as severe or atypical headache, visual disturbances, and non-neurologic symptoms such as severe abdominal pain or proteinuria.1 Emergent treatment involves prompt administration of (intravenous) IV magnesium sulfate.2,3,4 Adjuncts include securing the airway if necessary and administration of IV antihypertensive medications. Like preeclampsia, definitive management is by prompt delivery of the fetus if the mother is still pregnant.1 If untreated, maternal mortality is as high as 14%.1 Women who develop eclampsia are at increased risk of obstetric complications in subsequent pregnancies and at higher risk for cardiovascular disease and metabolic disease later in life. Educational Objectives: At the end of this oral boards session, examinees will: 1) Demonstrate ability to obtain a complete medical history including a detailed obstetric history. 2) Demonstrate the ability to perform a detailed physical examination in a postpartum female patient who presents with a seizure. 3) Investigate the broad differential diagnoses which include electrolyte imbalances, brain tumor, meningitis or encephalitis, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets (HELLP) syndrome and eclampsia. 4) List the appropriate laboratory and imaging studies to differentiate eclampsia from other diagnoses (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, magnesium level, pregnancy testing, urinalysis, and computed tomography [CT] scan of the head). 5) Identify a postpartum eclampsia patient and manage appropriately (administer IV magnesium therapy, administer IV antihypertensive therapy, emergent consultation with an obstetrician). 6) Provide appropriate disposition to the intensive care unit after consulting with an obstetrician. Educational Methods: This was envisioned as an oral board testing case due to the multiple aspects which require emergency care. Residents are expected to assess the seriousness of the patient's condition, elicit critical details from her recent medical history, and synthesize that data in order to treat a medically complex patient. Oral board testing is able to incorporate each of these aspects together and provide the resident with a dynamic learning environment.Oral board testing is a way to assess the resident's ability to rapidly obtain and interpret multiple sources of information simultaneously. By utilizing a case that requires pharmaceutical therapy, the clinical competency committee is able to obtain additional milestones which are sometimes difficult to test in the emergency department itself.Learners were assessed using online evaluation tools available, ie, Google forms. Critical actions were subsequently tied to Emergency Medicine Milestones and the results were compiled and used for resident evaluations and clinical competency. Residents were given verbal feedback immediately after the examination, and they were provided with the scores of their online evaluation after all results were compiled. Research Methods: Learners and instructors provided written feedback after the case was administered to assess for strengths and weaknesses of the case, and modifications were then made to better address concerns. Learners answered written multiple-choice questions on high-level concepts, ie, critical actions, at least one month after this exam was completed. Results: Learners found this a challenging, but enjoyable, way to refresh their knowledge and skills regarding preeclampsia, and this was a highly rated part of their mock oral board examination. Overall, residents rated the session 4.3 (1-5 Likert scale, 5 being Excellent) after the oral board review session was completed. Comments from residents included "haven't seen post-partum preeclampsia in residency" and "challenging to remember magnesium dosing." Discussion: Residents and medical students were evaluated using this method and both enjoyed the activity as a novel way to study as well as exercise their medical knowledge. The content was both highly relevant to the practice of emergency medicine and the format was an effective way to deliver the information to the learners. The case is a good model to evaluate for the high stakes testing of both the written and oral board examinations, but also a way to assess residents' abilities to treat preeclamptic and eclamptic patients in the emergency department. Topics: Eclampsia, preeclampsia, seizures, end-organ damage, hypertensive emergency, altered mental status, neurologic emergency, obstetric emergency.

Esophageal Rupture Associated With COVID-19: A Novel Case Report.

Emergency departments (EDs) are the primary driver for hospital admissions in the United States (US), and that trend is likely to continue through the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. As the US continues to experience rampant community spread, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will likely present in increasingly variable ways to the EDs. We present a case of Mallory-Weiss tear and esophageal perforation, which was likely caused by COVID-19 pneumonia. This case is notably the first of its kind that we have seen reported in the COVID-19-related literature. Clinicians should be vigilant about the various complications of COVID-19 and continue to exercise caution when seeing and treating these patients.

Ebola or Not? Evaluating the Ill Traveler From Ebola-Affected Countries in West Africa.

Background. The 2014-2015 Ebola epidemic in West Africa had global impact beyond the primarily affected countries of Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. Other countries, including the United States, encountered numerous patients who arrived from highly affected countries with fever or other signs or symptoms consistent with Ebola virus disease (EVD). Methods. We describe our experience evaluating 25 travelers who met the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definition for a person under investigation (PUI) for EVD from July 20, 2014 to January 28, 2015. All patients were triaged and evaluated under the guidance of institutional protocols to the emergency department, outpatient tropical medicine clinic, or Emory's Ebola treatment unit. Strict attention to infection control and early involvement of public health authorities guided the safe evaluation of these patients. Results. None were diagnosed with EVD. Respiratory illnesses were common, and 8 (32%) PUI were confirmed to have influenza. Four patients (16%) were diagnosed with potentially life-threatening infections or conditions, including 3 with Plasmodium falciparum malaria and 1 with diabetic ketoacidosis. Conclusions. In addition to preparing for potential patients with EVD, Ebola assessment centers should consider other life-threatening conditions requiring urgent treatment, and travelers to affected countries should be strongly advised to seek pretravel counseling. Furthermore, attention to infection control in all aspects of PUI evaluation is paramount and has presented unique challenges. Lessons learned from our evaluation of potential patients with EVD can help inform preparations for future outbreaks of highly pathogenic communicable diseases.

Thoracic outlet syndrome: a neurological and vascular disorder.

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a condition arising from compression of the subclavian vessels and/or brachial plexus as the structures travel from the thoracic outlet to the axilla. Despite the significant pathology associated with TOS, there remains some general disagreement among experts on the specific anatomy, etiology, and pathophysiology of the condition, presumably because of the wide variation in symptoms that manifest in presenting patients, and because of lack of a definitive gold standard for diagnosis. Symptoms associated with TOS have traditionally been divided into vascular and neurogenic categories, a distinction based on the underlying structure(s) implicated. Of the two, neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is more common, and typically presents as compression of the brachial plexus; primarily, but not exclusively, involving its lower trunk. Vascular TOS (vTOS) usually involves compression of the vessel, most commonly the subclavian artery or vein, or is secondary to thrombus formation in the venous vasculature. Any anatomical anomaly in the thoracic outlet has the potential to predispose a patient to TOS. Common anomalies include variations in the insertion of the anterior scalene muscle (ASM) or scalenus minimus muscle, the presence of a cervical rib or of fibrous and muscular bands, variations in insertion of pectoralis minor, and the presence of neurovascular structures, which follow an atypical course. A common diagnostic technique for vTOS is duplex imaging, which has generally replaced more invasive angiographic techniques. In cases of suspected nTOS, electrophysiological nerve studies and ASM blocks provide guidance when screening for patients likely to benefit from surgical decompression of TOS. Surgeons generally agree that the transaxillary approach allows the greatest field of view for first rib excision to relieve compressed vessels. Alternatively, a supraclavicular approach is favored for scalenotomies when the ASM impinges on surrounding structures. A combined supraclavicular and infraclavicular approach is preferred when a larger field of view is required. The future of TOS management must emphasize the improvement of available diagnostic and treatment techniques, and the development of a consensus gold standard for diagnosis. Helical computed tomography offers a three-dimensional view of the thoracic outlet, and may be valuable in the detection of anatomical variations, which may predispose patients to TOS. This review summarizes the history of TOS, the pertinent clinical and anatomical presentations of TOS, and the commonly used diagnostic and treatment techniques for the condition.