Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced squamous and other selected carcinomas: results of a Phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of advanced squamous carcinomas of various primary sites. METHODS: Patients were eligible for this trial if they had metastatic squamous carcinoma at any site except the lung. In addition, patients with locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck were eligible, if they were considered unlikely to be cured with combined modality therapy. Sixty patients entered this trial between February 1995 and March 1999; 12 patients (20%) had received 1 previous chemotherapy regimen, whereas 48 patients (80%) were previously untreated. All patients received the following regimen: paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), 1-hour intravenous infusion, Days 1 and 22; carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 6.0 intravenously, Days 1 and 22; 5-FU 225 mg/m(2)/day, by 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion, Days 1-35. Treatment courses were repeated at 6-week intervals; responding patients continued treatment for a maximum of 4 courses (24 weeks). RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 60 patients treated (65%) had objective responses to this regimen, with 25% complete responses. Twelve patients (22%) remain progression free from 7 to 63 months (median, 35 months) after completion of therapy. Complete responses were observed in squamous carcinomas from various primary sites including head and neck, esophagus, cervix, vagina, anus, and unknown primary. The most frequent Grade 3/4 toxicities observed with this 3-drug regimen included leukopenia (48%), diarrhea (17%), mucositis (28%), and portacath-related events (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term infusional 5-FU is feasible, well tolerated, and highly efficacious in patients with advanced squamous carcinomas of various primary sites. This regimen merits further investigation.

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: a phase II trial of the Minnie pearl cancer research network.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with advanced unresectable urothelial carcinoma entered this multi-centered, community-based, phase II trial between May 1997 and December 1999. All patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) by 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 8, and 15; courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients who had objective response or stable disease continued treatment for six courses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 54 patients (54%; 95% confidence interval, 40% to 67%) had major responses to treatment, including 7% complete responses. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 16 patients (30%) remain alive and nine (17%) are progression-free. The median survival for the entire group was 14.4 months; 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 57% and 25%, respectively. Seven (47%) of 15 patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy responded to paclitaxel/gemcitabine. Grade 3/4 toxicity was primarily hematologic, including leukopenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and anemia (28%). Ten patients (19%) required hospitalization for neutropenia and fever, and one patient had treatment-related septic death. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in the first- or second-line treatment of patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. Response rate and duration compare favorably with those produced by other active, first-line regimens. This regimen should be further evaluated in phase II and III studies, as well as in patients with compromised renal function.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination therapy in transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium.

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium is considered a chemosensitive malignancy; however, few patients receiving standard therapies achieve long-term disease control. Thus, new treatment approaches using more effective and less toxic agents are needed to improve prognosis in these patients. Two new agents currently being studied are gemcitabine and the taxanes; both of which have produced overall response rates ranging from 22.5 to 28% (gemcitabine), and 7-56% (paclitaxel) when used as single agents in this disease. Both agents have been well tolerated. Results of two phase II studies of gemcitabine combined with paclitaxel have been published. In one, 60% (15/25) of evaluable patients with advanced stage IV TCC responded; in the other, 53% (8/15) of patients with advanced and/or metastatic TCC responded. Several trials evaluating different dosing regimens of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel or docetaxel are ongoing or planned.

Preoperative combined modality therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, prolonged infusion 5-fluorouracil, and radiation therapy in localized esophageal cancer: preliminary results of a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and therapeutic efficacy of 1-hour paclitaxel, carboplatin, continuous low-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil, and concurrent radiation therapy administered preoperatively in patients with localized esophageal cancer. PATIENT AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with localized esophageal cancer, of either squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma histology, were enrolled into this phase II trial. All patients were candidates for surgical resection and received the following neoadjuvant therapy: paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2, 1 hour IV on days 1 and 22; carboplatin, AUC 6.0, IV on days 1 and 22; 5-fluorouracil, 225 mg/m2/day, continuous IV infusion on days 1 to 42; and radiation therapy, 45 Gy, administered by 1.8-Gy daily fractions beginning on day 1 of chemotherapy. Upon completion of this neoadjuvant regimen, patients were reevaluated, and all responding patients were resected within 6 weeks of completing neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: Administration of this combined modality regimen was associated with moderate toxicity and was tolerated by most patients. Leukopenia (65%) and esophagitis (31%) were the most common toxicities. Most patients did not require nutritional support. There were no treatment-related deaths during neoadjuvant therapy; however, three patients (9%) experienced postoperative death. Preliminary assessment of treatment efficacy is encouraging, with 17 of 37 evaluable patients (46%) achieving pathologic complete remission and an additional 11 patients (30%) having only microscopic residual disease. CONCLUSIONS: This novel, combined-modality neoadjuvant approach for the treatment of localized esophageal carcinoma is feasible and can be administered with toxicity that compares favorably to previously reported neoadjuvant regimens containing high-dose cisplatin. Preliminary assessment of efficacy is also encouraging, with 46% of patients having pathologic complete response. Further follow-up and larger numbers of patients are required to assess efficacy more definitively.

Phase I/II trial of paclitaxel by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is widely used in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. In this Phase I/II study the authors evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of adding a third active antineoplastic agent, gemcitabine, to the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with advanced (AJCC Stage IIIB or IV) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma previously untreated with chemotherapy were eligible for this trial. The maximum tolerated doses, determined in the Phase I trial and subsequently used in the Phase II trial, were: paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2, as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1; carboplatin, at area under the curve dose of 5.0 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 i.v., on Days 1 and 8. Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days. The Phase II study was conducted in 13 community-based practices in the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network; 77 patients were treated between December 1996 and September 1997. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 77 patients (44%) in the Phase II trial had major responses (partial responses, 32 patients and complete responses, 2 patients). An additional 25 patients (33%) had stable disease or minor response; only 23% of patients progressed or were removed from study at or prior to first reevaluation. The median survival was 9.4 months, with a 45% actuarial 1-year survival rate. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity, with Grade 3/4 NCI Common Toxicity Criteria leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in 49% and 45% of patients, respectively. However, only 11 patients (14%) required hospitalization for neutropenia/ fever, and none had bleeding complications. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue (41%), arthralgias/myalgias (26%), peripheral neuropathy (8%), nausea/emesis (6%), and hypersensitivity reactions (4%). There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: This three-drug regimen is active and has acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Myelosuppression, particularly thrombocytopenia, is increased in comparison to the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen. Fatigue also may be increased, but other nonhematologic toxicities are not altered substantially by adding gemcitabine. Although the response rate and median survival are improved modestly compared with our previous experience with paclitaxel/carboplatin, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of this regimen await the completion of randomized trials.

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion in the treatment of upper aerodigestive malignancies: preliminary results of phase II trial.

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy regimen that included paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), carboplatin, and long-term, continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. In the preoperative treatment of patients with localized esophageal cancer, we administered this regimen concurrently with radiation therapy. Thirty-eight patients with biopsy-proven cancers of the head and neck or esophagus entered this trial between January 1996 and November 1996. Patients with head and neck cancers considered curable with local treatment modalities were excluded. All patients received the following chemotherapy regimen: paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 via 1-hour intravenous infusion on days 1 and 21, carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 6.0 intravenously on days 1 and 21, and 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m2/d via continuous infusion on days 1 to 42. Patients with localized esophageal cancer also received radiation therapy beginning on day 1 (1.8 Gy/d; total dose, 45 Gy). Patients were re-evaluated at week 6; responding patients received a repeat course of treatment, except for those with localized esophageal cancer, who underwent resection at week 10. Twenty-five of 29 evaluable patients had major responses to treatment. Four of five patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer had complete clinical responses, while eight of 11 patients with metastatic disease responded. All 13 evaluable patients with localized esophageal cancer underwent resection, and nine (69%) had a pathologic complete response. Toxicity was moderate, with brief grade 3/4 leukopenia occurring in 19 patients (66%). Esophagitis occurred in five of 13 patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but was reversible and generally occurred during the last week of radiation therapy. Other grade 3/4 toxicity was uncommon. This novel regimen of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and long-term 5-fluorouracil infusion is feasible and highly active in patients with cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. It can be used concurrently with radiation therapy before resection for localized esophageal cancer. The high overall response rates, and particularly the high pathologic complete response rates in resected patients with esophageal cancer, are encouraging and warrant further evaluation of this regimen.

5-Azacytidine treatment of HA-A melanoma cells induces Sp1 activity and concomitant transforming growth factor alpha expression.

Evidence indicates DNA methylation as a part of the regulatory machinery controlling mammalian gene expression. The human melanoma cell line HA-A expresses low levels of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha). TGF-alpha mRNA accumulated, however, in response to DNA demethylation induced by a nucleoside analog, 5-azacytidine (5-azaC). The importance of DNA methylation in the TGF-alpha promoter region was examined by a transient transfection assay with luciferase reporter plasmids containing a portion of the TGF-alpha promoter. 5-azaC treatment of HA-A cells before the transfection caused a significant increase in the luciferase activity. Since input plasmids were confirmed to remain unmethylated, DNA demethylation of the TGF-alpha promoter itself does not account for the observed increase in TGF-alpha mRNA. Using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, enhanced formation of protein-TGF-alpha promoter complex was detected in response to 5-azaC treatment. This 5-azaC-induced complex was shown to contain the transcription factor Sp1 by the following criteria: the protein-DNA complex formed on the TGF-alpha promoter contained immunoreactive Sp1; the mobility of the complex in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay was similar to that formed by recombinant Sp1; and DNase I footprinting analysis demonstrated that the 5-azaC-induced complex produced a footprint on the TGF-alpha promoter identical to that of authentic Sp1. These observations suggest that 5-azaC induces TGF-alpha expression by augmenting the Sp1 activity. However, neither the Sp1 mRNA nor its protein was induced by 5-azaC. These results suggest that in HA-A cells, TGF-alpha expression is down-modulated by DNA methylation. In addition, this process may involve the specific regulation of Sp1 activity without altering the amount of the transcription factor.