[PARP inhibitors - A better selection of patients]. / Inhibiteurs de la PARP : une meilleure sélection des patient-e-s.

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have established themselves as a class of essential anti-cancer drugs. They inhibit PARP proteins involved in DNA damage repair. Their anti-tumor action requires a concomitant abnormality in DNA damage repair, the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The genomic instability being too substantial, the tumor cell goes into apoptosis (concept of synthetic lethality). This last decade, the selection of patients benefiting from PARPi has been refined with convincing results for ovarian cancers, but also breast, prostate and pancreatic cancers. This article presents recent data that have impacted our clinical practice and the PARPi authorized in Switzerland.

Les inhibiteurs de la PARP (poly-ADP-ribose-polymérase : iPARP) se sont imposés comme une classe de médicaments anticancéreux incontournable. Ils inhibent les protéines PARP impliquées dans la réparation de l'ADN. Leur action antitumorale nécessite une anomalie concomitante dans la réparation de l'ADN, le déficit de recombinaison homologue (HRD). L'instabilité génomique devenant trop conséquente, la cellule tumorale entre en apoptose (concept de synthetic lethality). La sélection des patient-e-s bénéficiant des iPARP s'est affinée cette dernière décennie avec des résultats probants pour les cancers de l'ovaire, mais aussi du sein, de la prostate et du pancréas. Cet article présente les données récentes ayant impacté notre pratique clinique et les iPARP autorisés en Suisse.

Physicians communicating with women at genetic risk of breast and ovarian cancer: Are we in the middle of the ford between contradictory messages and unshared decision making?

BRCA1/2 genetic testing offers tremendous opportunities for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast and ovarian cancer. Women acquire valuable information that can help them to make informed decisions about their health. However, knowing one's susceptibility to developing cancer may be burdensome for several women, as this risk needs to be managed over time through a continuous dialogue with multiple healthcare professionals. We explored how communication between physicians and unaffected women carrying BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants was experienced by women in relation to their genetic risk. Data came from qualitative interviews conducted in Switzerland with 32 unaffected women carrying BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and aware of their genetic status for at least 3 years. We identified three different types of message as conveyed by physicians to women: (1) a normative message, (2) an over-empowering message, and (3) a minimizing message. On one hand, we found that women are exposed to contradictory messages, often simultaneously, in their interactions with healthcare professionals during their post-genetic testing journey. On the other hand, women's reports highlighted the absence of shared decision-making in such interactions. The combination of these two findings resulted in a strong sense of disorientation, frustration, and powerlessness among participants. Healthcare professionals interacting with high cancer risk women are urged to align in favor of a both concerted and shared decision-making approach when discussing options for managing genetic risk.

Challenges in managing genetic cancer risk: a long-term qualitative study of unaffected women carrying BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations.

PURPOSE: Women carrying BRCA1/BRCA2 germ-line mutations have an increased risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer. To minimize this risk, international guidelines recommend lifelong surveillance and preventive measures. This study explores the challenges that unaffected women genetically predisposed to breast/ovarian cancer face in managing their risk over time and the psychosocial processes behind these challenges. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, biographical qualitative interviews were conducted in Switzerland with 32 unaffected French- and Italian-speaking women carrying BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Their mutation status had been known for at least 3 years (mean, 6 years). Data were analyzed through constant comparative analysis using software for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: From the time these women received their positive genetic test results, they were encouraged to follow medical guidelines. Meanwhile, their adherence to these guidelines was constantly questioned by their social and medical environments. As a result of these contradictory pressures, BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers experienced a sense of disorientation about the most appropriate way of dealing with genetic risk. CONCLUSION: Given the contradictory attitudes of health-care professionals in caring for unaffected BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers, there is an urgent need to educate physicians in dealing with genetically at-risk women and to promote a shared representation of this condition among them.Genet Med 17 9, 726-732.