Event-related potential correlates of stimulus equivalence classes: A study of task order of the equivalence based priming probes with respect to the stimulus equivalence tests, and among the distinct trial types with each other.

This study investigates the influences of: 1) the task order of two stimulus equivalence classes (SEC) probes, and 2) the possible differences within the equivalence trial types. These factors were analyzed together on both behavioral and event-related potentials (ERP) data. Two groups of normal subjects participated in two successive sessions. In the first session, all participants were trained in the baseline relations among visual stimuli (pseudo-words). In the second session, one group performed the matching-to-sample (MTS) equivalence tests before the equivalence-relatedness-priming (EBRP) task, while the other group performed both tasks in reverse order. In the EBRP task related trial types included trained, symmetrical and equivalence relationships while the unrelated trial types included the same stimuli but without relationships. Event related potentials were recorded separately for related and unrelated conditions during the EBRP task. Results showed that response times to related trials were shorter than those to unrelated ones. At the electrophysiological level, two late waveforms were sensitive to the differences among the stimulus pairs of the EBRP task: Both waveforms were larger for the unrelated than the related conditions. Conversely, there were no main influences of the task order or of the trial types with each other. These results provide evidence that 1) the EBRP task exhibits priming effects among the SEC stimuli, 2) the behavioral and electrophysiological effects were similar regardless of whether the EBRP task was done before or after the MTS tests, and 3) there were no differences within the baseline and derived trial types in the EBRP task.

Ensombreciendo el surgimiento de clases de equivalencia / Overshadowing the formation of equivalence classes

Investigaciones actuales postulan que el condicionamiento respondiente (CR) es suficiente para establecer clases de equivalencia de estímulos (CEE). A su vez, el fenómeno de ensombrecimiento no se ha estudiado dentro del contexto de aprendizaje de CEE. Estudiar la influencia de procesos propios del CR se plantea como una forma de evaluar esta hipótesis. Tres clases de tres estímulos fueron entrenadas mediante una tarea de emparejamiento con la muestra. Cada clase estuvo compuesta por dos estímulos simples y un estímulo compuesto, conformado por dos estímulos de distinta saliencia. Luego se evaluó la emergencia de relaciones derivadas para los estímulos saliente y ensombrecido. La emergencia de CEE se observó en cuatro de 13 sujetos para el estímulo saliente y en ninguno para el estímulo ensombrecido. Estos resultados demuestran que la emergencia de relaciones derivadas es sensible al ensombrecimiento, y aporta evidencia respecto del rol del CR en la formación de CEE.

Current researches postulate that respondent conditioning (RC) is sufficient to establish Stimuli Equivalence Classes (SEC). In turn, the influency of the the overshadowing phenomenon has not been studied within the learning context of SEC. Studying the influence of RC\'s processes is posed as a way of evaluating this hypothesis. Three classes of three stimuli were trained through a matching to sample task. Each class consisted of two simple stimuli and one compound stimulus, consisting of two stimuli of different salience. The emergence of derived relationships for salient and overshadowed stimuli was then evaluated. Emergence of SEC was observed in four of 13 subjects for the salient stimuli and in none for the overshadowed stimuli. These results shown that the emergence of derived relationships is sensitive to overshadowing, and provides evidence regarding the role of RC in the formation of SEC.

Effects of mixed training structures on equivalence class formation

The experimental literature reports differences in performance when participants are tested for the emergence of derived relations after stimulus equivalences class training, depending on which training structured is used. Comparison-as-node and sample-as-node structures have shown to be more effective in producing the emergence of derived relations than linear series, with inconclusive results about which of the first two structures is more effective. Intertrial correspondence was manipulated between the stimuli via the use of mixed training structures. 48 participants were divided in four groups: the first received equivalence-class training using a sample-as-node structure, the second following a comparison-as-node structure, and the other two following a mixed structure with the same nodal density of the central node as the first two. The four groups were taught two five-member equivalence classes with a nodal density of four. Both during training and testing, the performances were higher for the sample-as-node and the comparison-as-node structures, compared to the other two structures. Results are discussed from the lens of hypotheses based on simple-discriminations learning and the role of samples and comparisons (AU)

No disponible