ABSTRACT
AIM: Calibration of impedance measurement was performed vs the Association Françoise de Normalisation (AFNOR) MPN method with a view to rapid enumeration of Escherichia coli in live marine bivalve molluscs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Linear regression models between log10 MPN and detection time (DT) were adjusted for several shellfish types, growth media, and impedance instruments (BacTrac and Malthus systems). Escherichia coli concentrations could be estimated from DT using a single regression line for BacTrac 4100 with M1 medium (R2 = 87.8%) and Malthus with M2 medium (R2 = 86.7%), and two regression lines for BacTrac 4110 with M2 medium (R2 = 86.4 and 88.2%). The uncertainty of the predicted bacterial concentration was around +/-0.43 log unit for duplicate sample analysis. The impedance signal was attributable to E. coli in 99% of cases. All cultures containing E. coli produced an impedance signal with BacTrac 4100 and BacTrac 4110, whereas 5.6% did not exhibit a signal with Malthus. CONCLUSIONS: Impedance measurement is a possible alternative to the MPN method for rapid quantitative estimation of E. coli in live bivalve shellfish. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The impedance method reduces analysis handling time considerably and is much easier to use than the MPN method. Moreover, results can be obtained within 5-10 h, allowing rapid intervention to ensure public health protection in case of shellfish contamination.
Subject(s)
Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Food Microbiology , Shellfish/microbiology , Animals , Calibration , Electric Impedance , Regression Analysis , SeawaterABSTRACT
One hundred and forty five Mabs against RH antigens were tested. In this paper, we chose to detail reactivity of MoAbs directed against variant RBCs of the CNRGS collection for which we studied the molecular background. Because we developed procedures to identify variants of the RhD, RhC, RhE and Rhe antigens, we were especially interested in finding new monoclonal antibodies that could help us to characterize more accurately these variants. Therefore, we drew parallels between our procedures and results obtained with the 2001 workshop antibodies.
