[Femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. A critical appraisal]. / Femtosekundenlaser in der Kataraktchirurgie. Eine kritische Betrachtung.

BACKGROUND: The use of femtosecond lasers (FSL) is increasingly spreading in cataract surgery. Potential advantages over standard manual cataract surgery are the superior precision of corneal incisions and capsular openings as well as the reduction of ultrasound energy for lens nucleus work-up. Exact positioning and dimensioning of the anterior capsular opening should help reduce decentration and tilt of the intraocular lens (IOL) optics and thus achieve better target refraction. Together with the possibility to correct low-grade corneal astigmatism by precise arcuate incision, FSL technology is expected to convert cataract surgery from a purely curative into a refractive procedure. METHODS: Apart from own experiences this review article critically analyses the pertinent literature published so far as well as congress presentations and personal reports of other FSL surgeons. The advantages and disadvantages are scrutinized with regard to their impact on the surgical and refractive results and compared with those experienced by the authors with manual cataract surgery over several decades. Economic and healthcare political aspects are also addressed. RESULTS: The use of FSL surgery improves the precision and reproducibility of corneal incisions and the capsular opening and reduces the amount of ultrasound energy required for lens nucleus work-up. However, the clinical benefits must be put into perspective due to the subsequent surgical manipulation of the incisions (during lens emulsification, aspiration and IOL injection), the lacking possibility to visualize the crystalline lens equator as the reference for correct capsulotomy centration and the relativity of ultrasound energy consumption on the corneal endothelial trauma. This is of particular relevance against the background of the significantly higher costs. Conversely, tears of the anterior capsule edge which, apart from interfering with correct IOL positioning, may entail serious complications presently occur more frequently with all FSL instruments. From the economic and healthcare political viewpoint, thought should be given to the possible acquisition of the cataract surgical business by the industry or investors, as cataract surgery is a high-volume standardized procedure with enormous future potential. This could fundamentally change our currently decentralized and individualized structures and subsequently the steam of patient and make surgeons largely dependent or superfluous.

[Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and cataract surgery. Avoidance and treatment of complications]. / Pseudoexfoliationssyndrom und Kataraktchirurgie. Vermeidung und Behandlung von Komplikationen.

Eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome often exhibit insufficient mydriasis, zonular weakness and pronounced fibrotic capsular shrinkage. This may make cataract surgery as such difficult but also leads to postoperative complications, such as rhexis ovalization or phimosis (capsule contraction syndrome) or progressive zonular weakening with final spontaneous dislocation of the capsule-implant complex (CIC). To avoid or correct for this special techniques and implants may be used: as prophylaxis, intracameral adrenalin and retroiridal capsulorhexis, iris retractors or dilators, various models of capsular tension and bending rings, bimanual capsule ring implantation, capsular bag stabilization with iris retractors or segments and secondary capsulorhexis may be used. Rhexis phimosis may be excised by a special diathermic probe, a subluxated CIC may be sutured to the sclera either in toto or the lens only after removal from the capsule bag, the latter also to the posterior iris surface. When luxated into the vitreous cavity, the CIC may be lifted to the iris plane and refixed as described or exchanged for a new lens sutured into the sulcus or an angle or iris-supported anterior chamber lens.

Posterior capsulorhexis combined with optic buttonholing: an alternative to standard in-the-bag implantation of sharp-edged intraocular lenses? A critical analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Current after-cataract prevention relies on optimizing the natural barrier effect of the optic rim against lens epithelial cell (LEC) migration. However, deficiencies in circumferential capsular bag closure caused by the intraocular lens (IOL) haptic or delayed secondary re-division of the fused capsules by Soemmering s ring formation lead to primary or secondary barrier failure. Consequently, surprisingly high posterior laser capsulotomy rates have been reported long-term, even with optimal capsular surgery and the most widespread hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, considered to be the most advanced. Intraoperative removal of the central posterior capsule has been shown to be effective in further reducing LEC immigration. However, efficacy has turned out to be limited because of the propensity of LECs to use the posterior optic surface as an alternative scaffold. TECHNIQUE: in pediatric cataract surgery, buttoning-in of the optic into an adequately-centered posterior capsulorhexis opening has been described previously. This technique was further elaborated and applied as the standard technique in a large series of adult eyes. In general, the diameter aimed at was 5-6 mm for the anterior, and 4-5 mm for the posterior capsulorhexis. Between September 2004 and June 2007, 1000 consecutive cases have thus been performed and systematically evaluated. One hundred and fifty eyes additionally underwent extensive anterior LEC abrasion. Another sub-series investigated the option of further reducing capsular fibrosis by creating an anterior capsulorhexis larger than the optic. EVALUATION: special scrutiny was applied to detect postoperative vitreous entrapment. Regeneratory and fibrotic after-cataract formation were both meticulously followed-up. Postoperative pressure course, anterior segment inflammation, macular thickness and morphology, as well as axial optic stability and optic centration, were evaluated in intraindividual comparison studies. RESULTS: A low rate of vitreous complications was found, which can be avoided by appropriate surgery. Vitreous entanglement occurred in six eyes, and vitreous herniation after PPCCC over-sizing in two. In three, anterior vitrectomy was performed. There was only one single case of retinal detachment-supposedly unrelated to the technique itself-and no case of cystoid macular edema. Retro-optical regenerate formation was completely abolished, while fibrosis was drastically reduced by the posterior capsule sandwiched in between the anterior LEC layer on the backside of the anterior capsule and the anterior optic surface, thereby blocking contact-mediated myofibroblastic LEC transdifferentiation. Additional capsular polishing further reduced residual fibrosis emerging from the anterior capsule contacting the optic adjacent to the haptic junction, as well as regeneratory LEC re-proliferation on the posterior capsule overlying the optic. Postoperative pressure course was almost identical to that found after standard in-the-bag implantation of the IOL, as was flare, and macular thickness and morphology. As opposed to bag-fixated IOLs, no axial movement of the optic was detected. IOL optics always perfectly centered even when the capsular opening was not optimally centered. Due to the exquisite stretchability and elasticity of the posterior capsule, the 6-mm IOL optic could safely be buttoned-in in a posterior capsulorhexis of 4 mm and smaller. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior optic buttonholing (POBH) is a safe and effective technique which not only excludes retro-optical opacification, but also withholds capsular fibrosis by obviating direct contact between the anterior capsular leaf and the optic surface. Anterior LEC abrasion significantly reduced both the residual fibrosis and regeneratory LEC proliferation. Apart from pediatric cataract, POBH is currently recommended for eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome, high axial myopia, peripheral retinal disease, and multifocal IOL implantation. Toric IOLs and magnet-driven accommodative IOL systems are other potential applications. Generally, POBH holds promise for becoming a routine alternative to standard in-the-bag IOL implantation in the future.

Objective assessment of intraocular flare after cataract surgery with combined primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing in adults.

AIM: Combining primary posterior capsulorhexis (PPC) and posterior optic buttonholing (POBH) in cataract surgery is an innovative approach to prevent after-cataract formation effectively and to increase postoperative stability of the intraocular lens (IOL). The present study was designed to compare the postoperative intraocular flare after cataract surgery with combined PPC and POBH to conventional in-the-bag implantation of the IOL. METHODS: Fifty consecutive age-related cataract patients with cataract surgery under topical anaesthesia in both eyes were enrolled prospectively into a prospective, randomised clinical trial. In randomised order, cataract surgery with combined PPC and POBH was performed in one eye; in the other eye cataract surgery was performed conventionally with in-the-bag IOL implantation keeping the posterior lens capsule intact. Intraocular flare was measured 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively, as well as 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, using a KOWA FC-1000 laser flare cell meter. RESULTS: The peak of intraocular flare was observed in POBH eyes and eyes with in-the-bag IOL implantation 1 h postoperatively. In both groups, the response was steadily decreasing thereafter. During measurements at day 1, small though statistically significant higher flare measurements were observed in eyes with in-the-bag IOL implantation (p<0.05). At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, intraocular flare measurements were comparable again (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Cataract surgery with combined PPC/POBH showed slightly lower postoperative anterior chamber reaction compared to conventional in-the-bag implantation during 4-week follow-up, indicating that POBH might trigger somewhat less inflammatory response. This could be explained by the posterior capsule sandwiching between the optic and the anterior capsule, preventing direct contact-mediated myofibroblastic trans-differentiation of anterior lens epithelial cells with consecutive cytokine depletion.

[After-cataract following intraocular lens implantation. Part II: prevention with alternative implants and techniques]. / Nachstarbildung nach Intraokularlinsenimplantation. Teil II: Prävention mittels alternativer Implantate und Techniken.

The introduction of sharp-edged optics has drastically reduced, but not fully eradicated, retro-optical after-cataract formation. The effectiveness of capsular bending rings or primary posterior capsulorhexis is also limited, and these have not become widespread because of the demanding surgical technique and the costs associated with an additional implant. Anterior capsule polishing has been found to even increase the need for laser capsulotomy, and rinsing the sealed capsular bag with cell-toxic agents has not yet gained clinical application. Routine posterior optic buttonholing through a well-centered posterior capsulorhexis opening is a promising alternative because it precludes access of lens epithelial cells behind the optic while at the same time counteracting fibrosis of the anterior capsule. Because this effect is independent of optic rim design and lens material, future efforts in lens refinement may concentrate on reducing the reflectivity of the optic rim and optimizing the biocompatibility of the lens material.

[After-cataract following intraocular lens implantation. Part I. Genesis and prevention by optimizing conventional lens implants and surgical techniques]. / Nachstarbildung nach Intraokularlinsenimplantation. Teil I: Genese und Prävention durch Optimierung konventioneller Linsenimplantate und Operationstechniken.

After-cataract is the most common complication in cataract surgery. Implementing a sharp posterior optic edge has, together with improved cortical aspiration, drastically reduced its rate. The impact of optic design and material has been systematically studied in detail in Vienna in a series of prospectively randomized intra-individual comparison studies using objective evaluation methods. Circular rhexis-optic overlap is essential for the durability of the posterior sharp optic edge barrier effect. Using haptics with a capsular bag design and a slim junction to the optic enhanced it further. The use of fibrosis-inducing optic materials has been shown to prolong the barrier effect, which was decreased after anterior capsule polishing. Although the incidence of clinically significant after-cataract has been significantly reduced by these conventional measures, it still cannot be completely avoided.

Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.

BACKGROUND: Significant efforts have been made to develop lens implants or refilling procedures that restore accommodation. Even with monofocal implants, apparent or pseudoaccommodation may provide the patient with substantial though varying spectacle independence. True pseudophakic accommodation with a change of overall refractive power of the eye may be induced either by an anterior shift or a change in curvature of the lens optic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Passive-shift lenses were designed to move forward under ciliary muscle contraction. This is the only accommodative lens type currently marketed (43E/S by Morcher; 1CU by HumanOptics; AT-45 by Eyeonics). The working principle relies on various hypothetical assumptions regarding the mechanism of natural accommodation. Dual-optic lenses were designed to increase the dioptric impact of optic shift. They consist of a mobile front optic and a stationary rear optic which are interconnected with spring-type haptics. With active-shift lens systems the driving force is provided by repulsing mini-magnets. Lens refilling procedures replace the lens content by an elastic material and provide accommodation by an increase of surface curvature. RESULTS: Findings with passive-shift lenses have been contradictory. While uncorrected reading vision results were initially reported to be favorable with the 1CU, and excellent with the AT-45 lens, distant-corrected near vision did not exceed that with standard monofocal lenses in later studies. Mean axial shift from laser interferometric measurements under stimulation with pilocarpine showed a moderate anterior shift with the 1CU, while the AT-45 paradoxically exhibited a small posterior shift. With the 1CU, the shift-induced accommodative effect was calculated to be less than +0.5 D in most cases, while +1 D was achieved in a single case only. Ranges and standard deviations were very large in relation to the mean values. Under physiological near-point stimulation, however, no shift was seen at all. Prevention of capsule fibrosis by extensive capsule polishing did not enhance the functional performance. Dual optic lenses are under clinical investigation and are reported to provide a significant amount of accommodation. However, possible long-term formation of interlenticular opacifications remains to be excluded. Regarding magnet-driven active-shift lens systems, initial clinical experience has been promising. Prevention of fibrotic capsular contraction is crucial, and it has been effectively counteracted with a special capsular tension ring, or lens fixation technique, together with capsule polishing. Lens refilling has been extensively studied in the laboratory and in primates. Though it offers great potential for fully restoring accommodation, a variety of problems must be solved, such as achieving emmetropia in the relaxed state, adequate response to ciliary muscle contraction, satisfying image quality over the entire range of accommodation and sustained functioning. The key problem, however, is again after-cataract prevention. CONCLUSIONS: As opposed to psychophysical evaluation techniques, laser interferometry measures what shift lenses are designed to provide: axial shift on accommodative effort. While under pilocarpine some movement was recorded, no movement at all was found under near-point stimulation with any of the lenses currently marketed. In contrast, magnetic-driven active-shift lens systems carry the potential of sufficiently topping up apparent accommodation to provide for clinically useful accommodation while using conventional lens designs with proven after-cataract performance. Dual optic implants significantly increase the impact of axial optic shift. The main potential problem, however, is delayed formation of interlenticular regenerates. Lens refilling procedures offer the potential of fully restoring accommodation due to the great impact of increase in surface curvature on refractive lens power. However, various problems remain to be solved before clinical use can be envisaged, above all, again, after-cataract prevention. The concept of passive single-optic shift lenses has failed. Concomitant poor capsular bag performance makes these lenses an unacceptable trade-off. Magnet-assisted systems potentially combine clinically useful accommodation with satisfactory after-cataract performance. Dual optic lenses theoretically offer substantial accommodative potential but may allow for interlenticular after-cataract formation. Lens refilling procedures have the greatest potential for fully restoring natural accommodation, but will again require years of extensive laboratory and animal investigations before they may function in the human eye.

Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes.

PURPOSE: Most trials that study the lens movement of accommodative intraocular lens (IOLs) use pilocarpine to stimulate ciliary muscle contraction. The aim of this study is to assess in vivo whether a more physiologic, stimulus-driven accommodation is comparable to pilocarpine-induced IOL movement. DESIGN: Controlled patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included 38 eyes with accommodative IOL implants (1CU) and a control group of 28 eyes with conventional open-loop IOLs. METHODS: A high-precision biometry technique, partial coherence interferometry, was used to measure IOL position. Anterior chamber depth was measured during physiologic (near point) and pharmacological (pilocarpine 2%) stimulation. In a subgroup of 14 1CU eyes, IOL position was determined repeatedly within 90 minutes after pilocarpine administration. A different subgroup was investigated as to the effect of cyclopentolate on IOL position. Best-corrected distance visual acuity (VA), best-corrected near VA, and distance-corrected near VA (DCNVA) were assessed using logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution charts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anterior chamber depth change under pilocarpine and near-point-driven accommodation. RESULTS: Near-point accommodation did not induce movement of either the accommodating 1CU or the control IOLs. Pilocarpine induced a 201+/-0.137-mm anterior movement of the 1CU IOL (P<0.001), compared with no movement within the control IOL groups (P>0.05). There was no significant (P>0.05) difference in DCNVA between the accommodative and open-loop IOLs. No correlation between near point- or pilocarpine-stimulated IOL movement and DCNVA was found. Concerning the time course of movement after pilocarpine administration, most of the 1CU IOLs showed some movement 30 minutes after application. Cyclopentolate-induced ciliary muscle relaxation caused a posterior IOL movement, as compared with the relaxed state, when focusing on a distant target. CONCLUSION: Pilocarpine-induced ciliary muscle contraction seems to overestimate IOL movement relative to a monocular near-driven stimulus. Therefore, concerning IOL movement, pilocarpine may act as a superstimulus and may not adequately simulate daily life performance of accommodative IOLs. However, it may be helpful to evaluate the maximum potential of an accommodating IOL.

Surgical strategies in patients with combined cataract and glaucoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the elderly population, the combined presence of cataract and glaucoma is a frequent condition. In this situation, several surgical options are possible: cataract surgery only and later maybe trabeculectomy, trabeculectomy only and later maybe cataract surgery, or combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. This review compares the different surgical options on the basis of their achievable postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) level and success and complication rates. RECENT FINDINGS: The impression of better IOP regulation with trabeculectomy than with phacotrabeculectomy has been recently confirmed by an evidence-based review. Contrary to this finding, the success of deep sclerectomy or trabeculotomy does not seem to be compromised by simultaneous phacoemulsification. In eyes with previous glaucoma-filtering surgery, cataract surgery with clear corneal incision has no effect on mean IOP but increases the 3-year failure probability. For phacotrabeculectomy, moderate evidence of a beneficial effect of MMC on IOP regulation and only weak evidence for separating the incisions has been recently reported by another evidence-based review. SUMMARY: The choice of the preferred surgical method depends on the target pressure, the amount of glaucomatous damage, and the grade of visual disturbance caused by the cataract. Phacotrabeculectomy combined with mitomycin C achieves the best IOP lowering of all types of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery currently possible but is associated with potentially sight-threatening complications. In the absence of a low target pressure, phacotrabeculotomy or the combination of phacoemulsification with viscocanalostomy or deep sclerectomy may be the therapy of choice.

Capsular bending ring to prevent posterior capsule opacification: 2 year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the preventive effect of a capsular bending ring on anterior and posterior capsule (PCO) opacification in a 2 year clinical study. SETTING: Jinshikai Medical Foundation, Nishi Eye Hospital, Osaka, Japan. METHODS: This study comprised 60 patients with senile cataract (35 women, 25 men) with a mean age of 69 years. An open poly(methyl methacrylate) capsular bending ring with a truncated edge profile designed to create a sharp bend in the equatorial capsule was implanted in 1 eye of patients with a hydroxyethyl methacrylate intraocular lens (IOL). The contralateral eye, which acted as a control, received an IOL but no ring. Patients were examined 6 months (n = 52), 1 year (n = 48), and 2 years (n = 42) postoperatively. Anterior capsule opacification was determined by slitlamp evaluation. Anterior capsule shrinkage (area within the capsulorhexis) and PCO were evaluated and scored using a computer software package for image analysis. Posterior capsule opacification was also measured by the rate of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies. RESULTS: Anterior capsule opacification and shrinkage were significantly less in eyes with the ring. The mean PCO score was 0.235 +/- 0.215 (SD), 0.287 +/- 0.200, and 0.398 +/- 0.248 with the ring and 0.530 +/- 0.190, 0.670 +/- 0.225, and 1.111 +/- 0.298 without the ring at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively (P <.01 at each follow-up). An Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy was performed in 4 eyes with and 17 eyes without the ring after 2 years (P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: The capsular bending ring significantly reduced anterior capsule fibrosis and shrinkage as well as PCO. The ring may be useful in patients who are at high risk of developing eye complications from capsule opacification that require Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, in those expected to have vitreoretinal surgery and photocoagulation, and in cases of pediatric cataract.

A double masked placebo controlled study on the effect of nifedipine on optic nerve blood flow and visual field function in patients with open angle glaucoma.

AIMS: To investigate whether nifedipine affects ocular perfusion or visual fields in open angle glaucoma patients. METHODS: In a parallel group study nifedipine or placebo was administered for 3 months (n = 30). Ocular fundus pulsation amplitude (FPA), cup blood flow (Flowcup) and visual field mean deviation (MD) were measured. RESULTS: Five patients receiving nifedipine discontinued due to adverse events. Nifedipine did not affect FPA [difference: 0.3 microm (95% CI -0.3,0.9); P = 0.70], Flowcup: [difference: -9 rel.units (95% CI -133,114); P = 0.99], or MD [difference: 0.2dB (95% CI -2.2,2.7); P = 0.51] vs placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic nifedipine is not well tolerated in glaucoma patients and exerts no effect on visual fields or ocular perfusion.

Effect of topical brimonidine on intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of brimonidine 0.2% on intraocular pressure (IOP) after small incision cataract surgery. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: This prospective randomized study comprised 80 eyes of 40 patients scheduled for small incision cataract surgery in both eyes. In each patient, 1 eye was randomly assigned to receive 1 drop of brimonidine 0.2% or no treatment (control) immediately after surgery. The fellow eye received the other assigned treatment. All patients had standardized surgery by the same surgeon with sodium hyaluronate 1%, a temporal 3.5 mm sutureless posterior limbal incision, phacoemulsification, and implantation of a foldable intraocular lens. The IOP was measured preoperatively as well as 6 and 20 to 24 hours and 1 week postoperatively. RESULTS: Six hours after surgery, the mean increase in IOP was 4.7 mm Hg +/- 6.1 (SD) in the brimonidine group and 4.6 +/- 5.3 mm Hg in the control group. In each group, 17 eyes (43%) had an IOP increase of 5 mm Hg or more. Twenty to 24 hours after surgery, the mean increase in IOP was 1.5 +/- 4.2 mm Hg in the brimonidine group and 1.6 +/- 4.4 mm Hg in the control group. There were no statistically significant between-group differences at any measurement. CONCLUSIONS: In both groups, IOP significantly increased 6 hours and 20 to 24 hours after small incision cataract surgery. Brimonidine 0.2% failed to reduce the IOP increase observed after small incision cataract surgery.

Posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with hydrogel and silicone intraocular lens implantation: development of capsulorhexis size and capsule opacification.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on capsule opacification development and capsular bag changes within the first year after cataract surgery with 2 intraocular lenses (IOLs) of comparable design but different material. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Medical School, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with age-related cataract had bilateral small incision cataract surgery with a PCCC performed after capsular tension ring insertion. One eye was randomly assigned to receive a hydrogel IOL and the other eye, a silicone IOL. Standardized digital retroillumination photographs were taken 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery to evaluate changes in the dimensions of the anterior and posterior capsulorhexis opening area and the presence of anterior and posterior capsule opacification. RESULTS: The area of the anterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (ACCC) opening was significantly reduced during the first 6 postoperative months. The shrinkage was more pronounced (-25%) in the silicone IOL group than in the hydrogel IOL group. Ten percent of eyes with a silicone IOL had marked shrinkage of the ACCC. The area of the PCCC did not change in eyes with a hydrogel IOL but was larger (+20%) in eyes with a silicone IOL. Anterior ongrowth was observed in 60% in the hydrogel group and in no eye in the silicone group. Anterior capsule fibrosis was observed in 90% in the silicone group and in 20% in the hydrogel group. Total closure of the PCCC was not observed within the first year, but posterior ongrowth was observed in 40% in the hydrogel group and 10% in the silicone group. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior capsulorhexis shrinkage with concomitant posterior capsulorhexis enlargement was observed in eyes with a silicone IOL. The hydrogel IOL induced more ongrowth on the anterior and posterior IOL surfaces, whereas the silicone IOL induced more anterior capsule fibrosis. Total closure of the PCCC was not observed within the first year after surgery.

Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using a new optical biometry technique, dual-beam partial coherence interferometry (PCI), to improve intraocular lens (IOL) power prediction in cataract surgery. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna General Hospital, and Institute of Medical Physics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Preoperative axial length (AL) data obtained with PCI biometry and applanation ultrasound (US) biometry in 77 eyes of 51 patients was applied to 4 commonly used IOL power formulas. The refractive outcome and the mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated for each formula using both biometry methods. A linear multiple-regression model based on preoperative PCI biometry data was derived to predict the postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD). The predictive power of this regression model was assessed by adding the predicted ACD to the SRK/T formula. Predicted residuals were calculated to evaluate the feasibility and stability of this modified IOL power formula. RESULTS: Using PCI instead of US biometry significantly improved the refractive outcome with all 4 IOL power formulas. The Holladay I and SRK/T formulas yielded an MAE of 0.44 diopter (D) using PCI AL data and 0.56 D and 0.57 D, respectively, using US biometry data. The SRK/T formula combined with the PCI regression model for postoperative ACD prediction performed slightly better (MAE 0.42 D) than the conventional SRK/T formula alone. Predicted residuals revealed an MAE of 0.46 D, proving the predictive performance of the new formula. CONCLUSIONS: Partial coherence interferometry biometry applied to several widely used IOL power formulas yielded significantly better IOL power prediction and therefore refractive outcome in cataract surgery than US biometry. Further improvement can be achieved by applying PCI to a modified SRK/T formula that predicts the postoperative ACD using PCI biometry data.

Intraindividual comparison of the effects of a fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination and latanoprost on intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery.

To compare the effect of a fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination with that of latanoprost on intraocular pressure (IOP) after small incision cataract surgery. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. This prospective randomized study comprised 60 eyes of 30 patients scheduled for small incision cataract surgery in both eyes. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 drop of a fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination or latanoprost immediately after cataract surgery in the first eye. The second eye received the other antiglaucomatous agent. Cataract surgery was performed under sodium hyaluronate 1% with a temporal 3.5 mm sutureless posterior limbal incision, phacoemulsification, and implantation of a foldable intraocular lens. The IOP was measured preoperatively as well as 6 and 20 to 24 hours and 1 week postoperatively. Six hours after surgery, the mean IOP decreased by -0.8 mm Hg +/- 3.2 (SD) (P =.184) in the dorzolamide-timolol group and increased by 3.6 mm Hg +/- 3.5 (P <.001) in the latanoprost group. Twenty to 24 hours after surgery, the mean IOP decreased by -2.8 +/- 2.4 mm Hg (P <.001) in the dorzolamide-timolol group and increased by 0.6 +/- 3.5 mm Hg (P =.353) in the latanoprost group. The differences between groups were significant at 6 hours (P <.001) and 20 to 24 hours (P <.001). The fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination was more effective than latanoprost in reducing IOP after small incision cataract surgery. Only the fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination prevented a postoperative IOP increase and occasional IOP spikes of 30 mm Hg or higher.

Morphological appearance and size of contact zones of piggyback intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To characterize the morphology, size, and change in size of the contact zone of piggyback intraocular lenses (IOLs) of different materials and optic designs. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: In a prospective study, 9 eyes of 7 patients received piggyback IOLs of the following materials: poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), acrylic, hydrogel, and silicone. The contact zone between the anterior and posterior IOLs was photodocumented from 1 day to 1 year after surgery using specular microscopy. The contact zone area was measured. RESULTS: A contact zone was present with all IOL materials studied. The area of contact, however, differed significantly. With PMMA IOLs, the contact zone was small and surrounded by Newton rings, indicating the tiny gap between the IOLs. With IOLs of soft material, such as silicone and hydrogel, it was larger than with PMMA IOLs and had a slightly irregular shape. With foldable acrylic IOLs, it was regular, round, and slightly larger than with the soft materials. The contact area enlarged primarily during the first 3 months after surgery. After 1 year, 2 eyes with acrylic piggyback IOLs had a membrane formation around the contact zone and 2 eyes developed Elschnig pearls between the IOLs. CONCLUSION: In piggyback IOL eyes, the shape and size of the contact zone were strongly dependent on the IOL material and optic design. Contact area enlargement seemed to be induced by capsule shrinkage. Fibrous membrane formation around the contact zone and Elschnig pearl formation between the piggyback IOLs were long-term complications of this technique.

Intraocular pressure rise after small incision cataract surgery: a randomised intraindividual comparison of two dispersive viscoelastic agents.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of the dispersive viscoelastic agents Ocucoat (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 2%) and Viscoat (sodium chondroitin sulphate 4%-sodium hyaluronate 3%) on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after bilateral small incision cataract surgery. METHODS: This prospective, randomised study comprised 80 eyes of 40 consecutive patients with age related cataract in both eyes scheduled for bilateral small incision cataract surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to receive Ocucoat or Viscoat during cataract surgery of the first eye. The second eye was operated later and received the other viscoelastic agent. Cataract surgery was performed with a temporal 3.2 mm sutureless posterior limbal incision, phacoemulsification, and implantation of a foldable silicone intraocular lens. The IOP was measured preoperatively as well as 6 hours, 20-24 hours, and 1 week postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 hours after surgery the mean IOP increased by 4.6 (SD 5.1) mm Hg in the Ocucoat group (p<0.001) and by 8.6 (8.1) mm Hg in the Viscoat group (p<0.001). The increase was significantly higher in the Viscoat group than in the Ocucoat group (p=0.004). Intraocular pressure spikes of 30 mm Hg or more occurred in two eyes in the Ocucoat and in nine eyes in the Viscoat group (p=0.023); 20-24 hours and 1 week postoperatively the mean IOP was not statistically different. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that Viscoat causes a significantly higher IOP increase and significantly more IOP spikes than Ocucoat in the early period after small incision cataract surgery.

Randomised fellow eye comparison of the effectiveness of dorzolamide and apraclonidine on intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of 2% dorzolamide and 0.5% apraclonidine on intraocular pressure (IOP) following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. METHODS: This prospective, randomised study comprised 54 eyes of 27 consecutive patients with age-related cataract scheduled for cataract surgery in both eyes. In each patient the eye with the higher degree of cataract was randomly assigned to receive one drop of either dorzolamide or apraclonidine immediately after surgery. The fellow eye was operated on later and received the other treatment. Cataract surgery was performed with a superior 6.0 mm sutureless frown incision, phacoemulsification and implantation of a three-piece PMMA intraocular lens. The IOP was measured pre-operatively as well as 6 h and 20-24 h and 1 week post-operatively. RESULTS: The mean pre-operative IOP was not significantly different between the groups (dorzolamide group, 14.9 +/- 2.3 mmHg; apraclonidine group, 14.6 +/- 2.5 mmHg; p = 0.450). At 6 h post-operatively, the mean IOP was significantly lower in the dorzolamide than in the apraclonidine group (15.6 +/- 3.9 mmHg vs 18.0 +/- 4.0 mmHg; p < 0.001). An IOP increase of more than 5 mmHg at 6 h post-operatively occurred in 3 (12%) eyes in the dorzolamide group and in 9 (36%) eyes in the apraclonidine group (p = 0.034). At 20-24 h post-operatively and at 1 week post-operatively no difference was found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: 2% Dorzolamide is more effective than 0.5% apraclonidine in preventing the early post-operative IOP increase following phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

In vitro diffusion of mitomycin-C into human sclera after episcleral application: impact of diffusion time.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different diffusion times of mitomycin-C (MMC) on the intrascleral concentration vs depth profile of MMC in an experimental model. Scleral quadrants of eight human donor eyes were exposed to sponges soaked with MMC for an application time of 1 min. After irrigation with 40 ml saline, we allowed further diffusion of MMC in the sclera for 1, 5, 14 and 29 min until the specimens were further processed. A central 8 mm diameter scleral disk was horizontally dissected with a kryotome at -20 degrees C. MMC concentrations of six layers of 140 microm thickness were analysed by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. The MMC concentrations (microg g(-1)) of layer 1 were: 13.45+/- 5.9 (mean +/- S.D. at 2 min diffusion time), 7.6+/-2.5 (6 min diffusion), 5.6+/-3.1 (15 min diffusion) and 3.6+/-1.7 (30 min diffusion). The corresponding MMC concentrations of layer 6 were: 0.61+/-0.48, 1.47 +/-0.66, 1.83+/-0.42 and 2.98+/-0.97 microg g(-1). The superficial concentration of intrascleral MMC decreased with increasing diffusion time, the deep concentrations increased. After 30 min of diffusion time, equal concentrations of MMC were found in all layers. Even with current low-dose application regimens of MMC the concentrations in the inner side of the sclera rapidly increase beyond the limits of the therapeutic range. Owing to this fast diffusion of MMC, the only means of reducing ciliary body concentrations of MMC is to reduce the dose.

The capsular tension ring: designs, applications, and techniques.

Originally, the open poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) capsular tension ring (CTR) was designed to compensate for zonular defects or to stretch the posterior capsule in highly myopic eyes not receiving an intraocular lens (IOL). We address the variety of subsequent designs, applications, and techniques that have evolved. With pre-existing or intraoperative zonular defects, a standard CTR may be inserted before or at any time during cataract removal to maintain or re-establish an extended capsular diaphragm. For profound zonular dialysis or weakness, a CTR was designed for scleral fixation. Capsular tension rings with integrated tinted sector shields have been developed to compensate for sector iris colobomas or aniridia. The CTR has also been used as a measuring gauge for in vivo quantification of capsule dimensions and postoperative capsular shrinkage. The CTR has improved control during primary posterior capsulorhexis and prevented oval distortion along the lens axis postoperatively. During combined cataract and vitreous surgery, a CTR prevents capsule damage and provides undisturbed peripheral visualization before IOL implantation. Capsular tension rings may also influence capsule opacification formation. A special band-shaped CTR with sharp edges was developed to inhibit lens epithelial cell migration and avoid capsulorhexis-optic contact.