ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to present a cost-effectiveness analysis of a smoking cessation program delivered by physicians and compare results to other smoking cessation interventions. METHODS: Retrospective effectiveness figures from a previous evaluation of the smoking cessation program were supplemented with estimates based on researched assumptions. Net abstinence rates were determined for smokers, depending on their stage of readiness to quit, that is, "prepared," "contemplative," and "precontemplative," leading to an assessment of the number of smokers achieving abstinence as a result of the Smokescreen intervention. Costs were calculated from the perspectives of smokers, family physicians, organizers, trainers, and all parties combined. Assumptions were varied with a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Baseline costs per additional abstainer were $183 based on physicians' intervention costs at 1995 prices. This is the figure most comparable to previously conducted economic evaluations of smoking cessation interventions. Sensitivity analysis varying the perspective and under optimistic and pessimistic assumptions about effectiveness produced a wide variety of estimates. The decision to include or exclude training costs had a particularly important bearing on the estimates. However, under reasonable assumptions the cost per additional quitter compares favorably to smoking and other medical and health care interventions worldwide. CONCLUSIONS: The program appears cost-effective when compared to other smoking cessation and health promotion interventions and illustrates the potential for retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Family Practice/organization & administration , Smoking Cessation/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Australia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Smoking Cessation/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine among general practitioners (GPs) the effect of three different types of training on utilisation of a brief, controlled drinking intervention. DESIGN: A non-randomised intervention study. Setting, participants: 96 GPs (64%) within the South Eastern Sydney Division of General Practice participated; 35 chose workshop training, 39 one-to-one training and 22 received a special kit by mail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification by GPs of excessive drinkers by practice audits; use of the program determined by the number of patients recruited in 3 months and by GPs' use of the intervention 6 months after training. RESULTS: 41 (43%) GPs conducted practice audits, identifying 15.1% of males and 6.6% of females as excessive drinkers (regular excessive weekly consumption and/or binge). 179 patients were recruited by 36 GPs over 3 months, and 32% of these patients reported a reduction of alcohol consumption. 63% who attended workshop training, 57% who received one-to-one training, and 36% who received the kit by mail reported they were current users of the program at 6 months. Significantly fewer GPs who received the kit by mail reported ever using the program (59%) compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This naturalistic study found that workshops and one-to-one training sessions in doctors' surgeries achieved greater uptake of a brief intervention for problem drinkers than distribution of a special kit by mail.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism/therapy , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Family Practice , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Smokescreen for the 1990s is a brief program designed specifically for general practitioners to help patients to stop smoking and is based on the latest research in smoking cessation. This article looks at the major principles on which the revised program is based and outlines the key steps taken to assist smokers according to their readiness to quit.
