Demographic and pathologic factor regression to a growth rate model of p16-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Objectives: The current study aims to quantify the growth rate of p16-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, characterize causative relationships between demographic risk factors and tumor growth, and examine pathologic findings associated with the tumor growth rate at a tertiary care institution. It is hypothesized that causative relationships will be drawn between the individual sociodemographic and pathologic factors and oral cavity p16-negative squamous cell carcinoma growth rate. Methods: Prospectively recruited participants, receiving surgical intervention only, were followed from initial staging CT scan to surgical resection. Interval growth was calculated in cm3/week. Demographic information including age, sex, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, previous all-type malignancy, previous chemotherapy treatment, previous head or neck radiation exposure, and time interval elapsed between diagnosis and surgery was collected from each participant, and regression analysis was applied to determine causality. Results: Summary statistics revealed a mean growth rate for the study sample of 1.385cm3/week. Statistically significant regression correlations were detected between tumor growth and alcohol consumption, origination at the retromolar trigone, and clinical nodal stage. Conclusions: Through a small prospective cohort sample, the current study suggests clinical associations between alcohol consumption, origination at the retromolar trigone, and clinical nodal stage with rate of tumor growth. Future work will validate these relationships in a larger patient cohort, and against stronger modeling techniques. Level of Evidence: Prospective non-random cohort design.

Validity of functional patient-reported outcomes in head and neck oncology: A systematic review.

Malignancy and treatment effects in head and neck oncology can be devastating to functional aspects of patient life such as swallowing, blinking, speech, salivation, and facial expression. Historically, the subjective nature of patient experience has resulted in difficulty with quantification and measurement of functional outcomes. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are questionnaires developed with patient input, forming the new gold standard for clinician assessment of subjective functional outcomes. The current review aims to identify and characterize the validation of PROs pertaining to four critical functional outcomes in head and neck oncology: swallowing, speech, dry mouth, and chewing. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for published, English language, peer-reviewed abstracts involving patients ≥ 18 years of age. Of 708 results, 705 were excluded at abstract or full text screening for not meeting inclusion criteria, exclusion of head and neck SCC patients in development, or absence of a functional domain measurement. The three reviewed studies-Xerostomia Questionnaire, Swallowing Outcomes After Laryngectomy, and Edmonton 33-exhibited strong reliability and construct and content validity, though two applied only to individual functional outcomes within specific patient populations receiving radiation or laryngectomy. While many PROs have been developed in head and neck oncology, very few properly employed extensive patient input in the development process. Further work must be committed to increasing head and neck cancer patient input in PRO development, particularly in the functional domains of speech and chewing.

Development of the Alberta facial clinical evaluation scale: A patient-centred outcomes instrument for facial nerve paralysis.

OBJECTIVES: Facial nerve paralysis has functional, psychological and social consequences for patients. Traditionally, outcome measurements for facial nerve injuries have been clinician derived. Recent literature has shown that patient perspective is valuable and necessary in outcomes research. This study aimed to identify patient domains of concern and subsequently, develop a point-of-care questionnaire for clinical use. DESIGN: This mixed-methods prospective study was completed in three phases. In Phase I, 15 facial nerve injury patients were interviewed individually. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and coded with NVivo software. Analysis led to a conceptual framework detailing the most important quality of life outcomes. During Phase II, a focus group was held with five new patients in order to prioritise the outcome themes to a top six list. A second focus group was held with Otolaryngology-Head and Neck staff surgeons to create a 25-item questionnaire based on these six themes. In Phase III, the questionnaire was administered to 10 new patients to test for comprehension. SETTING: University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 patients with facial nerve injury were included in the various phases in the study. In addition, 5 staff Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgeons participated as focus group contributors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Domains of concern and quality of life outcomes as reported by facial nerve injury patients. RESULTS: Patients identified a total of 16 themes encompassing both functional and psychological deficits related to their facial nerve injury. From these findings, a 25-item Likert-type scale, the A-FaCE scale, was developed for clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with facial nerve paralysis experience functional and psychological deficits. This study led to the creation of the first patient-reported instrument for this population that addresses functional impairment, social function, psychological well-being and self-perception of appearance.

A High-Definition Video Teaching Module for Thyroidectomy Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: With the changing landscape of postgraduate surgical education to competency-based curricula, there emerges a need for alternative forms of training. Video teaching modules have been shown to be effective tools in surgical education, complementing traditional postgraduate curricula. There is a lack of validated modules described in the literature, specifically for teaching thyroidectomy. The primary objective of this study was to develop and validate a high definition video-based teaching module instructing thyroidectomy surgery to Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery trainees. DESIGN: This prospective study included intermediate to senior Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery residents. Each participant first performed a thyroid lobectomy, serving as the initial assessment. After a washout period of at least 3 weeks, each participant was given the teaching module. The 15-minute module was developed using a 3-camera system and detailed a step-by-step approach to the surgery. After exposure to the module, each trainee performed the same procedure. Recordings of both procedures were deidentified and reviewed by a blinded, independent evaluator. Scoring was done using the Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) system. SETTING: University of Alberta Hospital and Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6 intermediate to senior Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery residents entered and completed the study. RESULTS: The mean error rate was 8.8 errors per procedure before module exposure and 4.5 errors per procedure after exposure, representing a 49% decrease in error occurrence (p < 0.05). The mean staff takeover event rate was 10.5 takeovers per procedure prior to module exposure and 5.0 takeovers per procedure after exposure, representing a 52% decrease in error occurrence (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: High-definition video teaching modules are a useful complement to traditional surgical training. In a climate where new innovations for teaching thyroid surgery are needed, properly constructed and validated video teaching modules can serve as important tools in supplementing traditional surgical training.

Optimal site for facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study.

BACKGROUND: Since the first facial allograft transplantation was performed, several institutions have performed the procedure with the main objectives being restoration of the aesthetic appearance and expressive function of the face. The optimal location to transect the facial nerve during flap harvest in transplantation to preserve facial movement function is currently unknown. There are currently two primary methods to perform facial nerve neurorrhaphy between the donor and recipient-one protocol involves transection and repair of the facial nerve at the main trunk while the another protocol advocates for the neurorrhaphy to be performed distally at the main branches. The purpose of this study is to establish the optimal location for transection and repair of the facial nerve to optimize functional recovery of facial movement. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial using a rat model was performed. Two groups of 12 rats underwent facial nerve transection and subsequent repair either at the main trunk of the nerve (group 1) or 2 cm distally, at the main bifurcation (group 2). Primary outcome of nerve functional recovery was measured using a previously validated laser curtain model, which measured amplitude of whisking at 2, 4, and 6 post-operatively. The deflection of the laser curtain sent a digital signal that was interpreted by central computer software. RESULTS: At week 2 post-nerve surgery, the average amplitude observed for group 1 and 2 was 4.4 and 10.8 degrees, respectively. At week 4, group 1 showed improvement with an average amplitude of 9.7 degrees, while group 2 displayed an average of 10.2 degrees. The week 6 results showed the greatest improvement from baseline for group 1. Group 1 and 2 had average amplitudes of 17.2 and 6.9 degrees, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after facial nerve surgery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistical difference between these two locations of nerve repair using identical methods. Therefore, the authors recommend a single versus multiple nerve repair technique. This finding has potential implications for future facial allograft transplantations and at minimum necessitates further study with long-term follow-up data.

Eyelid and brow asymmetry in patients evaluated for upper lid blepharoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: In evaluation for blepharoplasty, patients often desire improved cosmesis and/or correction of visual field deficits. However, patients are usually unaware of eyelid or brow asymmetry. Furthermore, the prevalence of eyelid and brow asymmetry is infrequently reported in the medical literature. PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of brow and eyelid asymmetry in patients evaluated for upper lid blepharoplasty. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients evaluated for upper lid blepharoplasty were included in the study. Standard pre-operative photographs were taken of all patients using consistent background and photographic equipment. Two of the authors (KM & AM) independently recorded the margin pupil (MPD), central eyebrow (CED), nasal eyebrow (NED) and temporal eyebrow (TED) distances. To test the inter-observer reliability, the senior author (SMT) recorded the same measurements for 10% of randomly selected patients. We calculated 95% confidence intervals to compare symmetry between the right and left sides. RESULTS: One hundred patients (94 female, mean age 57.7) were included in the study. The average MPD, CED, NED and TED distances were 0.55 mm (95% CI 0.45-0.65), 1.77 mm (95% CI 1.47-2.07), 1.34 mm (95% CI 1.14-1.54), and 1.78 mm (95% CI 1.50-2.06), respectively. Ninety-three percent of patients had at least one asymmetric measurement of greater than 1 mm. Seventy-five percent of patients studied had at least one measurement greater than 2 mm while 37 percent had at least one greater than 3 mm. CONCLUSION: Brow and eyelid asymmetry is common in patients being evaluated for upper lid blepharoplasty. The facial plastic surgeon should identify and document facial asymmetry pre-operatively, and discuss it with prospective blepharoplasty patients. This will improve informed consent and patient expectations.

Prognostic factors for metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the prognostic significance of patient and disease characteristics on the survival of patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid gland at a tertiary care center in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. METHODS: A retrospective chart review for all patients diagnosed with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid gland from January 2000 to December 2010. Multiple variables were examined related to: patient demographics, surgical details, non-surgical procedure details, and tumor pathologic description. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients [48 men (88%) and 6 women (12%)], with a median age at surgery of 78 years (range 47-93 years) were included in the study. All patients had a minimum follow up of 12 months or until deceased, with a median duration of follow up of 24 months. Predictors that were significant for cancer recurrence were pretreatment N-stage, pathologic neck node status, total number of positive neck nodes, and perineural invasion. Predictors that were significant for cancer death were the total number of positive neck nodes and perineural invasion. The remainder of the predictors including margin status were non-significant. Only age and nodal status were significant for both cancer death and recurrence on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results showed only two variables that remained significant on multivariate analysis were age and number of involved neck nodes, this finding suggests that re-resection of positive margins may not be necessary and that radiation therapy is the mainstay of treatment for positive margins.