Daptomycin: a comparison of two intravenous formulations.

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibacterial agent with potent bactericidal activity against a broad range of Gram-positive organisms. In 2003, daptomycin for injection received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs); in 2006, it was approved for the treatment of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including those with right-sided infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant isolates. In 2016, the FDA approved a new formulation of daptomycin for injection (daptomycin RF) for the same indications. The efficacy and safety of daptomycin for injection have been established in pivotal clinical trials, and the findings of nonclinical studies indicate that both formulations of daptomycin for injection are equivalent. Herein we refer to the new daptomycin formulation as daptomycin RF to distinguish it from the original formulation. Daptomycin RF provides clinicians and clinical pharmacists with a product that offers improved stability and more rapid, in-vial reconstitution with either sterile or bacteriostatic water for injection, while maintaining the same antibacterial coverage. Here we discuss the rationale for and the potential value of daptomycin RF, and briefly review the similarities and differences between the original formulation of daptomycin and daptomycin RF.

A retrospective study of outcomes of device-associated osteomyelitis treated with daptomycin.

BACKGROUND: Daptomycin appears well tolerated and effective for osteomyelitis treatment. However, limited data exist regarding daptomycin use for treatment of device-associated osteomyelitis (DAO). METHODS: We used a retrospective, observational database (Cubicin® Outcomes Registry and Experience [CORE® 2007-2009]) that assessed patients treated with daptomycin to evaluate the characteristics of patients with DAO, outcomes after daptomycin treatment, and safety of daptomycin in this setting. Information from 54 institutions for patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and other hardware-associated osteomyelitis (OHAO) who received daptomycin from January 2007 to December 2008 with follow-up data in 2009 was collected using a standardized data collection form. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients receiving daptomycin were identified in CORE 2007-2009; 48 patients (59 %) had follow-up data. Sixty-seven percent of patients had received a previous antibiotic. Surgical intervention was similar between the 2 groups: PJI, 22 of 27 (82 %) and OHAO, 17 of 21 (81 %). However, device removal or replacement was more frequent in the PJI patients (17 of 27, 63 %) than in the OHAO patients (8 of 21, 38 %). Clinical success was reported in 22 of 27 (82 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 62-94 %) patients with PJI and 18 of 21 (86 %; 95 % CI, 64-97 %) patients with OHAO at follow-up (13-402 days). Adverse events occurred in 8 of 50 (16 %) patients in the safety population and did not differ by daptomycin dose. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin appeared effective and well tolerated in patients with DAO, including PJI or OHAO.

A retrospective review of clinical experience with daptomycin for a variety of wound types in a burn and wound care facility.

OBJECTIVE: Daptomycin is a novel antibiotic with activity against many Gram-positive organisms that has demonstrated efficacy in the management of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). However, data regarding the use of daptomycin for the management of burn wound infections are lacking. We assessed the efficacy and safety of daptomycin in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs), including burn wound infections. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving daptomycin for burn wound infections and other cSSTIs in a referral burn and wound treatment center. RESULTS: Our review revealed an overall success rate (microbiological cure + clinically improved) of 99.5%, with an overall success rate of 98.5% among burn patients, specifically. The overall success rate was 100% among patients in the three other diagnosis groups (cSSTIs, chronic wounds, and other infections). A success rate of 98% was noted among the subset of patients with wounds associated with bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that daptomycin is a safe and effective agent for the management of burn wound infections, although further study is warranted to confirm these results.

Daptomycin in bone and joint infections: a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of daptomycin, a novel antibiotic for the treatment of bone and joint infections, a literature search of relevant articles was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed/MEDLINE search (1990-April 2008) to identify relevant English-language literature was conducted. Search terms included bone and joint infection, osteomyelitis, daptomycin, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Additional articles were identified by reviewing the bibliographies of articles cited. Programs and abstracts from infectious disease meetings were searched, and prescribing information of antibiotics indicated for bone and joint infections consulted. All articles identified from data sources published in English were evaluated. RESULTS: Caused primarily by Gram-positive pathogens such as S. aureus and, to a lesser extent, Enterococcus faecalis, bone and joint infections are difficult to treat successfully. Surgical intervention and prolonged courses of antibiotics are frequently required, and failure of first-line antibiotic therapy is common. The emergence of S. aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, the longstanding gold standard for bone and joint infections, has complicated the clinical scenario. Few randomized trials comparing the efficacy of different antibiotics for bone and joint infections exist. Daptomycin, a novel intravenous lipopeptide antibiotic, has shown potent in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria, including many resistant pathogens commonly associated with bone and joint infections such as MRSA and vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis. Early clinical investigation of daptomycin in bone and joint infections unresponsive to antibiotics, such as vancomycin, has found a cure rate of approximately 80%, with a low incidence of adverse events and drug resistance. CONCLUSION: Further studies are warranted to determine if limited clinical evidence, described in individual case reports and a daptomycin-specific retrospective registry, suggests daptomycin is a promising option for patients with bone and joint infections such as MRSA osteomyelitis.

Clinical experience with daptomycin for the treatment of patients with osteomyelitis.

Data from a registry were analyzed to describe the clinical experience with daptomycin (Cubicin; Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, MA) for the treatment of patients with osteomyelitis. The Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (CORE) 2004 database was used to identify patients treated for osteomyelitis. Posttherapy follow-up outcome assessments were collected for a subset of these patients. A total of 67 patients with osteomyelitis were clinically evaluable for outcome at the end of daptomycin therapy and had outcome assessed at a posttherapy visit. The median follow-up interval after the last dose of daptomycin was 76 days (range, 1 to 547 days). The median initial dose was 5.6 mg/kg (range, 3.2 to 7.5 mg/kg), and the median duration of therapy was 35 days (range, 3 to 546 days). Daptomycin was given concurrently with other antibiotics in 48% of cases. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (45%). Clinical outcomes at follow-up were cure, 42 (63%); improved, 13 (19%); failure, 7 (10%); and nonevaluable, 5 (7%). A total of 82% of patients with an orthopedic device (n = 17) were successfully treated, as were 88% of patients with concurrent bacteremia (n = 16). Failures were more likely if surgical debridement was not performed (24% vs. 5%; P = 0.045). The clinical success rate for patients treated with an initial daptomycin dose >4 mg/kg was significantly higher than for patients treated with an initial dose < or =4 mg/kg (88% vs. 65%; P = 0.013, chi2 test). Daptomycin had a 94% success rate when used alone with no follow-up antibiotics. The results indicate that daptomycin is being used in clinical practice to treat patients with osteomyelitis caused by gram-positive pathogens including MRSA. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of daptomycin are warranted that include rigorous data collection and long-term follow-up analysis.