Editor's Choice - Outcomes of Self Expanding PTFE Covered Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent for Chronic Iliac Artery Occlusion in Matched Cohorts Using Propensity Score Modelling.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare outcomes of self expanding PTFE covered stents (CSs) with bare metal stents (BMSs) in the treatment of iliac artery occlusions (IAOs). METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2015, 128 iliac arteries were stented for IAO. A CS was implanted in 78 iliac arteries (61%) and a BMS in 50 (49%). After propensity score matching, 94 limbs were selected and underwent stenting (47 for each group). Thirty day outcomes and midterm patency were compared; follow-up results were analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Overall, iliac lesions were classified by limb as TASC B (19%), C (21%), and D (60%). Technical success was 98%. Comparing CS versus BMS, the early cumulative surgical complication rate (12% vs. 12%, p = 1.0) and 30 day mortality rate (2% vs. 2%, p = 1.0) were equivalent. At 36 months (average 23 ± 17), overall primary patency was similar between CS and BMS (87% vs. 66%, p = .06), and this finding was maintained after stratification by TASC B (p = .29) and C (p = .27), but for TASC D, CSs demonstrated a higher patency rate (CS, 88% vs. BMS, 54%; p = .03). In particular, patency was in favour of CSs for IAOs > 3.5 cm in length (p = .04), total lesion length > 6 cm (p = .04), and IAO with calcification > 75% of the arterial wall circumference (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of self expanding CS for IAOs has similar early and midterm outcomes compared with BMS. Even if further confirmatory studies are needed, CSs seem to have higher midterm patency rates than BMSs for TASC D lesions, IAOs with a total lesion length > 6 cm, occlusion length > 3.5 cm, and calcification involving > 75% of the arterial wall circumference. These specific anatomical parameters may be useful to the operator when deciding between CS and BMS during endovascular planning.

Hemothorax Management After Endovascular Treatment For Thoracic Aortic Rupture.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe and analyze the management of hemothorax (HTX) and the occurrence of respiratory complications after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic rupture (TEVAR). METHODS: This was a multicenter study with retrospective analysis. Between November 2000 and December 2012, all patients with confirmed HTX due to rupture of the descending thoracic aorta treated with TEVAR were included. Respiratory function (acid base status, Pao2, Paco2, lactate, and respiratory index) was monitored throughout hospitalization. Primary endpoints were survival and post-operative respiratory complications. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were treated. The mean age was 62 ± 21 years (range 18-92 years). Etiology included traumatic rupture (n = 23, 41%), atherosclerotic aneurysm (n = 20, 36%), Debakey type IIIa dissection (n = 8, 14%), and penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 5, 9%). The primary technical success of TEVAR was 100%. The in hospital mortality rate was 12.5% (n = 7). Hemothorax was drained in 21 (37.5%) cases. In hospital respiratory complications occurred in 23 (41%) patients who required a longer intensive care unit stay (days 2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8, p = .017), and hospitalization (26 ± 17 vs. 19 ± 17, p = .021). Those who developed post-operative respiratory complications had lower pre-operative PO2 values (mmHg, 80 ± 24 vs. 91 ± 21, p = .012). Respiratory complications and in hospital mortality did not differ among aortic pathologies (p = .269 and p = 1.0, respectively), nor did in hospital mortality differ between patients with and without respiratory complications (13% vs. 12%; p = .990). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic rupture still has a high mortality rate. Respiratory complications have not been eliminated by endovascular repair. HTX evacuation may have had a positive influence on the survival in these patients. Although traumatic and degenerative ruptures are two significantly different scenarios, survival and respiratory outcomes were similar and were not affected by the underlying aortic disease.

Surgical infrarenal "neo-neck" technique during elective conversion after EVAR with suprarenal fixation.

OBJECTIVES: Conversion of a previous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with suprarenal fixation is a challenging situation even in the elective setting. The outcomes of a technique based on preservation of the first proximal covered stent of the endograft, used as a "neo-neck" for proximal anastomosis, are presented. METHODS: From 2001 to 2014, nine patients underwent elective conversion of a previous suprarenally fixed EVAR. After supraceliac clamping, the aneurysm sac was opened and the endograft identified; the fabric was cut beyond the first covered stent together with its native aortic wall in order to create a "neo-neck." An aortic balloon was inflated into the visceral aorta to avoid back bleeding. A Dacron bifurcated tube graft (Intergard, Maquet) was then sutured to the neo-neck mimicking endobanding, passing the stitches into the aortic wall and the first covered stent. RESULTS: The mean age was 68 years (range, 52-84 years). The stent grafts removed were four Zenith (Cook Medical), three Endurant (Medtronic), and two E-vita (Jotec). The indication for conversion was type 1A (n = 2), type 2 (n = 2), and type 3 (n = 1) endoleak, complete endograft thrombosis (n = 2), and abdominal pain with sac enlargement with no radiological sign of endoleak (n = 2). Blood loss was 1,428 mL (range 500-3,000 mL); the visceral ischemic time to perform the proximal anastomosis was 23.5 min ± 2.3 min). The post-operative complication rate was 11% (n = 1/9) related to a case of sac wall bleeding requiring re-intervention; mortality at 30 days was 0%. At 22 months (range, 8-41) the computed tomography angiogram demonstrated no signs of leaks or anastomotic pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSION: Preservation of the proximal covered stent of an endograft with suprarenal fixation used as an infrarenal "neo-neck" with incorporation of the aorta to the suture line during elective surgical explantation simplifies the procedure, and can be achieved with very low early morbidity and mortality; furthermore, it seems to be durable over mid-term follow up.

Long-term outcomes and sac volume shrinkage after endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate long-term outcomes and sac volume shrinkage after endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair (EVPAR). METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of all EVPAR cases between 1999 and 2012. Sac volume shrinkage, long-term patency, limb salvage, and survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The association of anatomical and clinical characteristics with patency was evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Forty-six EVPAR were carried out in 42 patients (mean age 78 years, 86% male; mean sac volume 45.5 ± 3.5 mL). In 93% of cases (n = 43) the procedure was elective, while in 7% of cases it was for rupture (n = 2) or acute thrombosis (n = 1). Of the 43 patients who underwent elective repair, 58% were asymptomatic and 42% symptomatic (14 claudication, 3 rest pain, and 1 compression symptoms). Technical success was 98%. Mean duration of follow-up was 56 ± 21 months. Primary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82% (SE 2), 79% (SE 4), and 76% (SE 4), while secondary patency was 90% (SE 5), 85% (SE 4), and 82% (SE 1) respectively; at 5 years there was 98% limb salvage and an 84% survival rate. During follow-up 11 limbs had stent graft failure: six required conversion, one underwent amputation, and four continued with mild claudication. Of those with graft failure, 63% (7/11) occurred within the first year of follow-up. The mean aneurysm sac volume shrinkage between preoperative and 5-year post-procedure measurement was significant (45.5 ± 3.5 mL vs. 23.0 ± 5.0 mL; p < .001). Segment coverage >20 cm was a negative predictor for patency (HR 2.76; 95% CI 0.23; p = .032). CONCLUSIONS: EVPAR provides successful aneurysm exclusion with good long-term patency, excellent limb salvage, and survival rates. Close surveillance is nevertheless required, particularly during the first postoperative year. Patients requiring long segment coverage (>20 cm) may be at increased risk for failure.

Parallel endografts in the treatment of distal aortic and common iliac aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular treatment of distal abdominal aortic aneurysms (D-AAA) and bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms (BCIAA) may present technical challenges for standard EVAR. Parallel iliac leg endografts (ILEs) of standard aortic devices and covered stents have been successfully employed to treat patients with D-AAA and BCIAA. The perioperative and long-term results of this straightforward endovascular technique are presented. METHODS: Beginning in 2009, patients deemed unfit for open surgery underwent parallel endografts D-AAA and BCIAA exclusion. Avoiding the use of a main body, ILEs are simultaneously delivered from both femoral arteries, landing parallel into the aortic neck (parallel grafts: PG). Distal landing zones including external iliac arteries (EIAs) are reached using appropriate ILEs. A third parallel covered stent graft (Viabahn, Gore) is delivered from a left brachial approach to maintain prograde blood flow to one internal iliac artery (IIA) when needed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were successfully treated using parallel endografts, nine for BCIAA and nine for D-AAA. All D-AAA presented an irregular saccular shape, including three penetrating aortic ulcers and two pseudoaneurysms of previous aortic grafts. Prograde flow to one IIA was successfully maintained using a Viabahn graft in five patients with BCIAA. Mean aneurysm size was 50 mm in D-AAA and 43 mm in BCIAA. One patient required a perioperative ILE extension to treat a type Ib endoleak. One patient suffered a minor stroke 24 hours after the procedure. Two type II endoleaks were observed postoperatively. Five patients died of non-aneurysm related causes during follow-up. No new endoleaks, graft displacements or occlusions were observed during follow-up (median: 26 months, range 12-42 months). CONCLUSIONS: Successful exclusion of D-AAA and BCIAA was achieved in high-risk patients using parallel endografts, allowing antegrade blood flow to one IIA when needed. Commercially available endografts were used in a simple and effective approach, with excellent follow-up results.

Unusual inflow sources and device introduction sites in aortic arch debranching.

AIM: Aim of the study was to evaluate a single center experience on hybrid treatment for thoracic aortic diseases, including aortic arch and ascending aorta endografting needing a total debranching from descending thoracic aorta and an antegrade endograft deployment from left ventricle. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2010 48 patients underwent thoracic aorta endografting, with coverage of at least one supra-aortic artery, because of atherosclerotic, dissecting and post-traumatic aneurysms or complications of previous aortic surgery. Supra-aortic trunks revascularization was obtained from ascending aorta, common carotid arteries and, in three cases, from descending thoracic aorta since the unavailability of common inflow sites. In three cases the antegrade endograft introduction through left ventricle (transapical approach, 2 cases) or ascending aorta (one case) was the only possibility for a safe deployment. RESULTS: Three groups have been identified on the basis of the proximal landing zone. Group A (27 patients): zone 2; Group B (9 patients): zone 1; Group C (12 patients): zone 0. The 30 days mortality was respectively 7.4%, 0% and 16%. Post operative paraplegia occurred in the 7.4% of group A, respiratory insufficiency and infections were the main post-operative complications with an incidence reaching 30% in each group. CONCLUSION: Hybrid procedures on aortic arch represent a possible treatment for cases unfit for open surgery despite the complication rates and mortality are not negligible. In selected cases, the endografting can be extended up to beyond the landing zone 0 where an antegrade transventricular endograft deployment and a supra-aortic perfusion from descending thoracic aorta represent a feasible option.

Role of the genetic study in the management of carotid body tumor in paraganglioma syndrome.

Diagnosis of carotid body tumor (CBT) was made in a 36 years old woman. The pre-operative examination included genetic analysis of the succinate dehydrogenase that showed a mutation in his subunit D responsible of multiple paraganglioma at slow growth. Subsequently a thoraco-abdominal CT and indium(111) octreotide body scan were performed and another paraganglioma was detected in the anterior mediastinum. CBT was surgically removed; differently the thoracic lesion due to his benign genetic profile was not treated. During a 3-years follow-up the thoracic paraganglioma as expected, didn't increase. Genetic analysis of succinate dehydrogenase, should be performed in the management of CBT.

Is carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians more dangerous than in younger patients?

AIM: The risk for developing stroke increases with the advancing age, peaking over age 80. In elderly patients, carotid endarterectomy may provide prophylaxis against stroke. Aim of our study was to compare patients 80 years or older with patients younger than 80 undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Endpoints were perioperative mortality and morbidity. METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2002, 1 659 patients underwent a 1 733 carotid endarterectomy for a symptomatic or asymptomatic significant carotid lesion. Among them, 125 patients were 80 years or older. We analyzed death and stroke rate from cerebrovascular accidents, TIA as well as non cerebrovascular complications and death rate postoperatively and in the long term follow-up. The Pearson's chi-squared(2) test was used for the statistical analysis on risk factors, morbidity and mortality. The Log rank test was used for cumulative stroke-free and survival rates between the 2 groups (level of confidence p<0.05). RESULTS: Risk factors were similar in both groups. No statistical difference was observed in the stroke, TIA, mortality and stroke free rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that perioperative and postoperative mortality and morbidity as well as the long-term stroke-free rate does not differ significantly in patients 80 years or older compared to patients younger than 80 undergoing carotid endarterectomy.