ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to investigate if machine learning algorithms can predict whether a lung nodule is benign, adenocarcinoma, or its preinvasive subtype from computed tomography images alone. METHODS: A dataset of chest computed tomography scans containing lung nodules was collected with their pathologic diagnosis from several sources. The dataset was split randomly into training (70%), internal validation (15%), and independent test sets (15%) at the patient level. Two machine learning algorithms were developed, trained, and validated. The first algorithm used the support vector machine model, and the second used deep learning technology: a convolutional neural network. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the classification on the test dataset. RESULTS: The support vector machine/convolutional neural network-based models classified nodules into 6 categories resulting in an area under the curve of 0.59/0.65 when differentiating atypical adenomatous hyperplasia versus adenocarcinoma in situ, 0.87/0.86 with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma versus invasive adenocarcinoma, 0.76/0.72 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ versus minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 0.89/0.87 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ versus minimally invasive adenocarcinoma + invasive adenocarcinoma, and 0.93/0.92 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ + minimally invasive adenocarcinoma versus invasive adenocarcinoma. Classifying benign versus atypical adenomatous hyperplasia + adenocarcinoma in situ + minimally invasive adenocarcinoma versus invasive adenocarcinoma resulted in a micro-average area under the curve of 0.93/0.94 for the support vector machine/convolutional neural network models, respectively. The convolutional neural network-based methods had higher sensitivities than the support vector machine-based methods but lower specificities and accuracies. CONCLUSIONS: The machine learning algorithms demonstrated reasonable performance in differentiating benign versus preinvasive versus invasive adenocarcinoma from computed tomography images alone. However, the prediction accuracy varies across its subtypes. This holds the potential for improved diagnostic capabilities with less-invasive means.
