Neural activity during attentional conflict predicts reduction in tinnitus perception following rTMS.

BACKGROUND: Subjective idiopathic tinnitus is an intrusive, distracting, and potentially disabling disorder characterized by phantom perception of sounds. Although tinnitus has no approved pharmacologic treatment, recent evidence supports the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to alleviate tinnitus symptoms. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Repetitive TMS delivered over the middle superior temporal gyrus (STG) may alter ratings of tinnitus awareness and annoyance more than loudness due to change in attentional processing. STG has reciprocal connections to regions of the prefrontal cortex that mediate attention. To probe the hypothesized influence of STG stimulation on attention, a subset of patients with tinnitus enrolled in an rTMS clinical trial [n = 12, 9 male, mean (sd) age = 49 (15) years] underwent an attentional conflict task before and after rTMS treatment in a repeated-measures functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. METHODS: The Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT), a Stroop-based visual attentional conflict fMRI task, was used to map participants' neural processing of attentional conflict prior to rTMS intervention (Baseline) and after three rTMS intervention arms: Sham, 1 Hz, and 10 Hz (four sessions per arm, 1800 pulses per session, delivered @110% of the motor threshold over the posterior superior temporal gyrus). RESULTS: All measures of tinnitus severity (awareness, loudness, and annoyance) improved with 1 Hz rTMS intervention; however, the greatest and most robust changes were observed for ratings of tinnitus awareness (mean 16% reduction in severity from Baseline, p < 0.01). The MSIT elicited a similar pattern of neural activation among tinnitus participants at Baseline compared to an independent sample of 43 healthy comparison adults (r = 0.801, p = 0.001). Linear regression with bootstrap resampling showed that greater recruitment of bilateral prefrontal and bilateral parietal regions by MSIT at Baseline corresponded with poorer treatment response. Individual regions' activities explained 37-67% variance in participant treatment response, with left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex's MSIT activity at Baseline explaining the greatest reduction in tinnitus awareness following 1 Hz stimulation. Although left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity at Baseline also predicted reduction in tinnitus loudness and annoyance (∼50% variance explained), these symptoms were more strongly predicted by right middle occipital cortex (∼70% variance explained) - suggesting that the neural predictors of symptom-specific treatment outcomes may be dissociable. CONCLUSION: These candidate neural reactivity markers of treatment response have potential clinical value in identifying tinnitus sufferers who would or would not therapeutically benefit from rTMS intervention.

Perception of motor strength and stimulus magnitude are correlated in stroke patients.

The authors examined whether perception of contralateral limb strength is altered and whether perception of strength correlates with perception of stimulus intensity (magnitude) in a prospective sample of patients with unilateral right (RHL: n = 13) and left (LHL: n = 6) hemisphere lesions due to stroke. Patients with RHL tended to overestimate strength and patients with LHL tended to underestimate strength; both patterns were highly correlated with altered perception of stimulus magnitude.

Just thinking about targets can aggravate neglect on cancellation tests.

While many studies investigate how the visual features of targets influence cancellation performance in neglect, few, if any, even consider that thought processes, such as the use of an algorithm to identify targets, might similarly aggravate neglect. This single-case study of a patient with chronic neglect compared cancellation performance after manipulating (1) ease of visual target identification, (2) the use of an algorithm to identify targets, and (3) the material-specific nature of target cancellation. Neglect severity was defined by the number and location of target omissions. While each manipulation had a differential impact on neglect severity, the novel and interesting finding occurred during the second condition, when a math algorithm was used to identify targets. In this condition, target omissions increased relative to other tests and target cancellations were confined to the right half of the page. This is the first report, to our knowledge, that neglect on cancellation tests can be aggravated by an internal thought process, a math algorithm, as opposed to external manipulations of visual stimuli and procedural characteristics of cancellation tests. An important characteristic of the algorithm used in this study is that it appeared to activate the intact left cerebral hemisphere.

Contributions of the parietal and frontal lobes to sustained attention and habituation.

The parietal cortex may be important in sustaining attention toward visual stimuli in peripheral space whereas the frontal cortex may mediate selective attention through habituation to peripheral stimuli. To test this hypothesis, patients with focal lesions of either the parietal or frontal cortex or both and normal controls were studied using a paradigm known as Troxler fading. Accordingly, if one fixates on a centrally located stimulus and attends to a stationary stimulus in peripheral vision, the peripheral stimulus quickly fades from awareness (i.e. Troxler fading: Troxler [Verschwinden, unseres, Opthal, Vol. 2, pp. 51-53. Fromann, Jena, 1804]). Movement of the peripheral stimulus on the retina normally prevents Troxler fading. Results indicated that patients with parietal lesions not only reported accelerated Troxler fading but also reported fading of moving peripheral stimuli contralateral to their brain lesion. In contrast, patients with frontal lesions rarely reported Troxler fading. In one patient with a left parietal and a right frontal lobe lesion fading was hemi-spatially dissociated, being accelerated in right hemispace but absent in left hemispace. These observations suggest that the parietal and frontal cortices play complementary roles in attentional processing.