The Association between Foot and Ulcer Microcirculation Measured with Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Diagnosis of peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer using current non-invasive blood pressure measurements is challenging. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a promising non-invasive technique to measure cutaneous microcirculation. This study investigated the association between microcirculation (measured with both LSCI and non-invasive blood pressure measurement) and healing of diabetic foot ulcers 12 and 26 weeks after measurement. We included sixty-one patients with a diabetic foot ulcer in this prospective, single-center, observational cohort-study. LSCI scans of the foot, ulcer, and ulcer edge were conducted, during baseline and post-occlusion hyperemia. Non-invasive blood pressure measurement included arm, foot, and toe pressures and associated indices. Healing was defined as complete re-epithelialization and scored at 12 and 26 weeks. We found no significant difference between patients with healed or non-healed foot ulcers for both types of measurements (p = 0.135-0.989). ROC curves demonstrated moderate sensitivity (range of 0.636-0.971) and specificity (range of 0.464-0.889), for LSCI and non-invasive blood pressure measurements. Therefore, no association between diabetic foot ulcer healing and LSCI-measured microcirculation or non-invasive blood pressure measurements was found. The healing tendency of diabetic foot ulcers is difficult to predict based on single measurements using current blood pressure measurements or LSCI.

Semi-Automatic Tracking of Laser Speckle Contrast Images of Microcirculation in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Foot ulcers are a severe complication of diabetes mellitus. Assessment of the vascular status of diabetic foot ulcers with Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) is a promising approach for diagnosis and prognosis. However, manual assessment during analysis of LSCI limits clinical applicability. Our aim was to develop and validate a fast and robust tracking algorithm for semi-automatic analysis of LSCI data. The feet of 33 participants with diabetic foot ulcers were recorded with LSCI, including at baseline, during the Post-Occlusive Reactive Hyperemia (PORH) test, and during the Buerger's test. Different regions of interest (ROIs) were used to measure microcirculation in different areas of the foot. A tracking algorithm was developed in MATLAB to reposition the ROIs in the LSCI scans. Manual- and algorithm-tracking of all recordings were compared by calculating the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The algorithm was faster in comparison with the manual approach (90 s vs. 15 min). Agreement between manual- and algorithm-tracking was good to excellent during baseline (ICC = 0.896-0.984; p < 0.001), the PORH test (ICC = 0.790-0.960; p < 0.001), and the Buerger's test (ICC = 0.851-0.978; p < 0.001), resulting in a tracking algorithm that delivers assessment of LSCI in diabetic foot ulcers with results comparable to a labor-intensive manual approach, but with a 10-fold workload reduction.

Novel Optical Techniques for Imaging Microcirculation in the Diabetic Foot.

BACKGROUND: The most severe diabetic foot ulcers are those related with critical ischemia, which is primarily diagnosed with non-invasive diagnostics. However, these diagnostics have several disadvantages. For example, they only provide global indications of the (macro)level of ischemia. A potential solution can be found in novel optical imaging techniques for local assessment of the microcirculation in diabetic foot ulcers. This review provides an overview of these imaging techniques (Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging, Photoacoustic Imaging and Hyperspectral Imaging) and their applicability for the diagnostic assessment of microcirculation in diabetic foot ulcers. METHOD: For each technique, the following parts are described: a) their technical background; b) general clinical applications; and, c) its application for microcirculation assessment in diabetic foot ulcers. Parts a-b are based on a narrative review of the literature, part c on a systematic review that was performed in the database Scopus, covering the period from January 1, 2000 to November 31, 2017. RESULTS: Each of these techniques has specific advantages and disadvantages for imaging microcirculation. Potential clinical use depends on measurement aims, and clinical relevance. However, none of the techniques has a strongly established clinical relevance yet: we found a limited number of publications describing clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to determine which technique is the most clinically relevant for the assessment of microcirculation in diabetic foot ulcers. CONCLUSION: Although promising, the currently available novel optical techniques need to be further improved technically and prospective trials are necessary to evaluate their clinical value.