E-cigarette or vaping induced lung injury: A case series and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, a rapidly increasing number of e-cigarette or vaping induced lung injury (EVALI) has been reported across the nation. Given the ongoing epidemic, it has been suggested that specific chemical substances used as additives in e-cigarettes could be highly related to EVALI. A history of vaping with positive radiographic changes and low suspicion for active infection are requirements for diagnosis but it still remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The course of the disease, mechanism of lung injury and the optimal management options need to be better understood. Here we aimed to discuss the clinical characteristics recognized in a case series of ten hospitalized EVALI patients with radiological findings of lung injury and provide an up today summary of the known literature of EVALI-induced lung injury. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on ten patients who presented to Saint Peter's University Hospital in New Brunswick, NJ from July 2019 to February 2020, with a mean hospital stay of five days. According to the CDC recommended definition of the disease, our cases met the current working definition of confirmed or probable cases of EVALI. RESULTS: Ten patients, with mean age 30.8 years (50 % male) and average years of vaping 1.708 with 60 % endorsing a simultaneous history of cannabis-related products use, went under a retrospective review. 3/10 (30 %) had documented medically-managed pulmonary disease history, 8/10 (80 %) presented with the respiratory-related chief complaint, 6/10 (60 %) presented with gastrointestinal symptoms and 7/10 (70 %) had constitutional symptoms. All patients (100 %) were found to have bilateral ground-glass opacities on chest imaging. 9/10 were admitted, 6/10 (60 %) had an oxygen saturation of <95 % requiring oxygen supplementation with 4/10 managed in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: EVALI patients with radiological findings of lung injury, although mainly present respiratory symptoms, may very often appear with constitutional and gastrointestinal symptoms. Based on the existing literature and our data it is argued that EVALI may be misdiagnosed and that closer monitoring is required to determine optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management of this condition. Our data and the existing literature suggest that laboratory and epidemiologic findings can be contributory for the diagnosis of the disease.

Endoanchor stenting for the repair of a Type I endoleak in the aortic arch following the endovascular repair of a Kommerrell's diverticulum.

As more challenging aortic arch anatomy is being treated using aortic stent-grafts, there is an increased risk for proximal Type I endoleaks at the proximal seal zone or subsequent graft migration. We report a case of an endoanchor-assisted thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair of a patient with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and aortic arch aneurysm who developed a proximal Type I endoleak in the aortic arch which was subsequently treated with endoanchors.

Moderate versus deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for elective aortic transverse hemiarch reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) with retrograde cerebral perfusion (DHCA group) has traditionally been the cerebral protection strategy during transverse hemiarch aortic reconstruction. Recently, we have adopted moderate hypothermic (≥ 25 °C) circulatory arrest (MHCA) with antegrade cerebral perfusion (MHCA group). We compared the outcomes for these two circulatory arrest management strategies. METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, in a concurrent series of 376 patients (DHCA, 301; MHCA, 75) undergoing transverse hemiarch for aortic aneurysm disease, incidences of concomitant root replacement (44% vs 47%, p = 0.8), and aortic valve replacement (29% vs 21%, p = 0.3) were similar, although atherosclerotic aneurysm pathology was present in patients in the MHCA group (71% vs 33%, p < 0.01). Antegrade cerebral perfusion was established via axillary artery or direct innominate artery cannulation. A database was prospectively maintained. RESULTS: MHCA group patients were older (66 ± 11 vs 60 ± 14 years; p < 0.01). Other demographics were similar. Aortic cross-clamp (128 ± 46 vs 163 ± 57 minutes, p < 0.01) and cardiopulmonary bypass (167 ± 49 vs 222 ± 61 minutes, p < 0.01) times were lower in the MHCA group. Transfusion requirements were significantly reduced with MHCA (38% vs 61%, p < 0.01), especially use of fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate. Direct innominate artery cannulation did not result in any vascular or neurologic complication. Postoperative outcomes were similar. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 1% in both groups. Stroke (0% vs 2%) and hemodialysis rates (0% vs 1%) were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: MHCA with antegrade cerebral perfusion yields excellent and equivalent outcomes to DHCA for elective aortic hemiarch reconstruction. MHCA significantly improves intraoperative times and, importantly, reduces transfusion requirements compared with DHCA with a retrograde cerebral perfusion strategy.