Alteration in amygdala subfield volumes and their association with cognition in mild cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: The amygdala has an important role in cognitive and affective functions. The involvement of amygdala and related limbic structures is implicated in many aspects of memory and emotion in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In the present study, we aimed to compare the volumetric measurements of amygdala and its subfields as well as their association with cognitive functions in stable MCI (sMCI). METHODS: We performed Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III (ACE-III) test, as well as high-resolution T1-weighted images from 31 participants with sMCI and 31 age-matched healthy controls. The amygdala subfield volumes were extracted using Freesurfer software, and group differences were assessed using general linear model (GLM) with age, gender, education and estimated intracranial volume (ICV) as covariates. Partial correlation was also calculated between cognitive scores and volumes of amygdala subfields in healthy controls and sMCI participants controlling for estimated ICV. RESULTS: sMCI participants exhibited significantly reduced volumes in most of the right amygdala subfields, including basal nucleus, accessory basal nucleus, central nucleus, medial nucleus, corticoamygdaloid transition area, and whole amygdala, as well as significantly reduced right amygdala/hippocampus ratio compared to healthy controls. In addition, our results revealed statistically significant positive correlations between ACE memory scores and the volumes of right central nucleus, right medial nucleus, right cortical nucleus, and the right whole amygdala, in sMCI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed volumetric reductions in most of the right amygdala subfields along with its association with the memory functions in sMCI. These findings provide valuable insights into the underlying anatomical factors contributing to neurocognitive symptoms in MCI.

Rural-urban disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and diabetes among aging Indians.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension and diabetes are modifiable risk factors for dementia. We aimed to assess rural-urban disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of these conditions among aging Indians. METHODS: Participants (n = 6316) were from two parallel, prospective aging cohorts in rural and urban India. Using self-report and clinical/biochemical assessments, we subdivided participants with diabetes and hypertension into undiagnosed and untreated groups. Logistic regression and Fairlie decomposition analysis were the statistical methods utilized. RESULTS: There was a significant rural-urban disparity in undiagnosed hypertension (25.14%), untreated hypertension (11.75%), undiagnosed diabetes (16.94%), and untreated diabetes (11.62%). Further, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, such as age and tobacco use were the common contributors to the disparities in both undiagnosed hypertension and undiagnosed diabetes, whereas education and body mass index (BMI) were significant contributors to the disparity in untreated hypertension. DISCUSSION: Rural Indians face significant healthcare disadvantages as compared to their urban counterparts, which prompts the urgent need for strategies for equitable healthcare.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on some modifiable risk factors of dementia in an aging, rural Indian population.

Introduction: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns is likely to have caused adverse changes in lifestyle-related/cardiovascular risk factors and other such modifiable risk factors of dementia. We aimed to examine the pandemic's impact on some modifiable risk factors of dementia among rural Indians belonging to a large, prospective aging cohort-Srinivaspura Aging, NeuoSenescence, and COGnition (SANSCOG). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among adults aged ≥ 45 years (n = 3,148; 1,492 males and 1,656 females) residing in the villages of Srinivaspura in Karnataka state, India. SANSCOG study data (clinical and biochemical assessments) of these participants were obtained from three distinct periods: (i) the "pre-COVID period"-before India's nationwide lockdown on 24 March 2020, (ii) the "COVID period"-during the first and second waves of the pandemic, wherein the social restrictions were prominent (25 March 2020 to 30 September 2021), and (iii) the "post-COVID period"-after easing of restrictions (from 1 October 2021 onward). Proportions of participants with diabetes, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia (diagnosed using standard criteria), and depression (diagnosed using the Geriatric Depression Scale) were compared between the above three periods. Results: The odds of having obesity, abnormal triglycerides, and depression among individuals in the COVID period were 1.42 times, 1.38 times, and 2.65 times more than the odds in the pre-COVID period, respectively. The odds of having hypertension, obesity, abnormal total cholesterol, abnormal triglycerides, abnormal LDL, and depression among individuals in the post-COVID period were 1.27 times, 1.32 times, 1.58 times, 1.95, 1.23, and 3.05 times more than the odds in the pre-COVID period, respectively. The odds of diabetes did not differ between any of the three periods. Discussion: We found significantly higher odds of some of the studied risk factors in the COVID and post-COVID periods compared to the pre-COVID period, suggesting that the pandemic adversely impacted the physical and psychological health of this marginalized, rural Indian population. We call for urgent public health measures, such as multimodal, lifestyle-based, and psychosocial interventions, to mitigate this negative impact and reduce the future risk of dementia.