Resistance to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors correlates with up-regulation of the MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

The extracellular signal-regulated (ERK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (p42/p44 MAPK) pathway is up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Molecular targeting of this critical mitogenic pathway may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of HCC; however, chemoresistance to long-term therapy may develop. In the present study, we employed small-molecule MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitors, including U0126 [1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis(2-aminophynyltio)butadiene] and PD184161 (Neoplasia 8:1-8, 2006), in HepG2 and Hep3B human HCC cell lines to identify potential mechanism(s) of resistance. U0126 dose-dependently suppressed ERK phosphorylation at both 1- and 24-h time points in HepG2 cells, previously shown to be sensitive to growth inhibition by U0126. In contrast, ERK phosphorylation was only decreased at the 1-h time point but not at 24 h in the more resistant Hep3B cells. It is interesting that the lack of prolonged phospho-ERK suppression was associated with MEK hyperphosphorylation in Hep3B cells. Several MEK/ERK pathway intermediates were up-regulated in Hep3B cells; furthermore, transfection of Raf-1 small interfering RNA to suppress MEK/ERK pathway activation sensitized Hep3B cells to U0126. MEK inhibitor resistance was independent of p53 or hepatitis Bx protein status. Finally, we showed that combining two chemically distinct MEK inhibitors enhanced growth inhibition and apoptosis compared with the single agents. Taken together, these results suggest that up-regulated expression or activity of the MEK/ERK pathway contributes to MEK inhibitor resistance in HCC cells. Our findings also provide preclinical evidence suggesting that the status of the MEK/ERK pathway in patients may predict response to MEK/ERK-targeted therapeutics.

Ethanol-TGFalpha-MEK signaling promotes growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chronic ethanol intake is a significant risk factor for the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The effects of ethanol on extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha), and HCC growth were examined in this study. METHODS: HepG2, SKHep, Hep3B human HCC cells, or normal human hepatocytes were treated with ethanol (0-100 mM), exogenous TGF-alpha, TGF-alpha neutralization antibody or the MEK inhibitor U0126. TGF-alpha levels were quantified by ELISA. Growth was determined by trypan blue-excluded cell counts. Cell cycle phase distribution was determined by flow cytometry. Protein expression was determined by Western blot. RESULTS: Ethanol treatment (10-40 mM) increased ERK activation in HepG2 and SKHep HCC cells but not in Hep3B or human hepatocyte cells. Growth increased in HepG2 (174 +/- 29%, P < 0.05) and SKHep (149 +/- 12%, P < 0.05) cells in response to ethanol treatment. Correspondingly, ethanol increased S phase distribution in these cells. U0126 suppressed ethanol-induced growth increases. Ethanol treatment for 24 h also raised TGF-alpha levels in HepG2 cells (118%-198%) and SKHep cells (112%-177%). Exogenous administration of recombinant TGF-alpha mimicked the ethanol-induced growth in HepG2 and SKHep cells; TGF-alpha neutralization antibody effectively abrogated this effect. The TGF-a neutralization antibody also prevented ERK activation by ethanol in HepG2 cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that clinically relevant doses of ethanol stimulate ERK-dependent proliferation of HCC cells. Ethanol up-regulates TGF-alpha levels in HCC cells and enhances growth through cell cycles changes, which appear to be mediated through TGF-alpha-MEK-ERK signaling. Ethanol-MEK signaling in normal hepatocytes is absent, suggesting that ethanol promotion of HCC growth may in part depend upon the acquisition of cancer-specific signaling by hepatocytes.

Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches.

OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic left-sided pancreatectomy (LLP) with traditional open left-sided pancreatectomy (OLP) in a multicenter experience. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: LLP is being performed more commonly with limited data comparing results with outcomes from OLP. METHODS: Data from 8 centers were combined for all cases performed between 2002-2006. OLP and LLP cohorts were matched by age, American Society of Anesthesiologists, resected pancreas length, tumor size, and diagnosis. Multivariate analysis was performed using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-seven LPs were performed, with 159 (24%) attempted laparoscopically. Indications were solid lesion in 307 (46%), cystic in 295 (44%), and pancreatitis in 65 (10%) cases. Positive margins occurred in 51 (8%) cases, 335 (50%) had complications, and significant leaks occurred in 108 (16%). Conversion to OLP occurred in 20 (13%) of the LLPs. In the matched comparison, 200 OLPs were compared with 142 LLPs. There were no differences in positive margin rates (8% vs. 7%, P = 0.8), operative times (216 vs. 230 minutes, P = 0.3), or leak rates (18% vs. 11%, P = 0.1). LLP patients had lower average blood loss (357 vs. 588 mL, P < 0.01), fewer complications (40% vs. 57%, P < 0.01), and shorter hospital stays (5.9 vs. 9.0 days, P < 0.01). By MVA, LLP was an independent factor for shorter hospital stay (P < 0.01, odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, LLP is associated with less morbidity and shorter LOS than OLP. Pancreatic fistula rates are similar for OLP and LLP. LLP is appropriate for selected patients with left-sided pancreatic pathology.