ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite being originally developed for the evaluation of lumbar disk degeneration, the Pfirrmann classification has emerged as the most popular classification system for cervical disk degeneration. However, with the Suzuki classification, a new classification system that is specifically tailored for the evaluation of cervical disk disease was introduced. In this study, we aim to evaluate differences in inter- and intraobserver reliability of both classifications in a head-to-head comparison. METHODS: In total, we have evaluated 120 cervical disks within 40 patients via magnetic resonance imaging according to the Pfirrmann and Suzuki classification. The degree of disk degeneration was evaluated by two independent musculoskeletal radiologists. After 6 months, the classification was reassessed to evaluate the intraobserver reliability. The inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were then calculated using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The inter- and intraobserver reliability provided a significant agreement between all ratings in Pfirrmann as well as the Suzuki classification (p>0.001). The interobserver reliability was determined to be fair in both the Suzuki classification (κ=0.290) and the Pfirrmann classification (κ=0.265). The intraobserver reliability was substantial in the Suzuki classification (κ=0.798), while it was almost perfect in the Pfirrmann classification (κ=0.858). CONCLUSIONS: Although not designed for the evaluation of cervical disk degeneration, the Pfirrmann classification yielded equal inter- and higher intraobserver reliability. Both classification systems are viable options for the grading of cervical disk degeneration. While the Pfirrmann classification has the advantage of being better established, the Suzuki classification may be clinically superior due to a better representation of cervical disk degeneration and the consideration of disk bulging for the classification of cervical disk degeneration.
ABSTRACT
We examined the impact of chronic prostatitis on the diagnostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). In this retrospective study, 63 men underwent 3T mpMRI followed by MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy to exclude/confirm clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). A total of 93 lesions were included for evaluation. Images were assessed by two radiologists. Prostatitis was graded visually on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced sequences. The correlation of prostatitis features with the assigned Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and the presence of csPCa were assessed, and the clinical and functional imaging parameters for differentiating between prostatitis and significant tumors were examined. Histopathological analysis was used as the reference standard. The rate of PI-RADS 3 scores tended to be higher in the presence of radiologically severe prostatitis compared with no/discrete prostatitis (n = 52 vs. n = 9; p = 0.225). In severe prostatitis, csPCa was determined in only 7.7% (4/52) of PI-RADS 3 lesions. In severe chronic prostatitis, a binary prostatitis suffix (e.g., PI-RADS 3 i+ versus i-) within the radiological report may help assess the limitations of mpMRI interpretability because of severe prostatitis and avoid unnecessary biopsies. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) was the best marker (cutoff 0.93 × 10-3 mm2/s) to differentiate between csPCa/non csPCa in severe prostatitis.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Anterior cervical decompression surgery exposes the vertebral artery to the risk of injury. This risk can increase if the natural course of the vertebral artery is altered. Therefore, this study evaluated if the distance between surgical landmarks and the vertebral artery decrease with the progression of cervical disc degeneration. METHODS: This study analyzed 40 patients with cervical magnetic resonance imaging. We evaluated the distance between the uncinate process and the vertebral artery in axial-plane T2 weighted sequences of the cervical levels C3-C6. The cervical disc degeneration was graded according to the Pfirrmann- and Suzuki classification. The decrease of the distance was evaluated using a one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The distance between the uncinate process and the vertebral artery decreased with increasing disc degeneration (pâ¯≤â¯0.015). ROC analysis provided an acceptable area under the curve in both classifications for the detection of a vertebral artery to the uncinate process distance of zero. The presence of Pfirrmann grade V had a positive predictive value of 69% for the presence of contact between the uncinate process and the vertebral artery. CONCLUSION: High-grade cervical disc degeneration according to the Pfirrmann- and the Suzuki classification decrease the distance between the uncinate process and the vertebral artery. High-grade disc degeneration therefore should raise the awareness of the surgeon for the loss of the distance between surgical landmarks and the vertebral artery. However, screening for high-grade disc degeneration alone cannot substitute the thorough evaluation of the anatomical course of the vertebral artery before surgery.
