Effectiveness of ovarian age as the background risk for aneuploidy screening in an unselected pregnant population.

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of first-trimester combined screening when replacing the chronological maternal age by Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC)-derived ovarian ages, as the background risk in trisomy risk estimation. A total of 639 pregnant women who completed first-trimester combined screening together with AMH and AFC determination were included. Trisomy risks were estimated based on three distinct 'maternal ages' as a-priori risk (chronological age, AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian age). The screening performance was assessed using three different approaches: received operator curve; detection rate and false positive rates for a fixed 1/250 threshold; and detection rates for a fixed 3% false positive rate. A non-significant trend was shown for AMH-derived age for both an increased area under the curve (0.986 versus 0.979) and an increased detection rate (from 83% to 100%) for a 1/250 risk threshold. For a 3% false-positive rate, a non-significant trend for increased detection with the use of both AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian ages was observed (from 67% to 83%). These results indicate that, although ovarian derived ages seem to potentially reflect a more precise background risk for fetal trisomies, the improvement in screening performance is only residual.

Role of ovarian reserve markers, antimüllerian hormone and antral follicle count, as aneuploidy markers in ongoing pregnancies and miscarriages.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of two ovarian reserve markers, antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC), as markers of the background risk for fetal trisomy. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENT(S): Assessment was carried out either in ongoing pregnancies or miscarriages in our center. INTERVENTION(S): AFC was assessed transvaginally during a routine (11-13 weeks) or referral scan. AMH was determined either during the first-trimester maternal serum markers assessment or in cases referred for chorionic villi sampling after the invasive procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): AMH reference ranges were constructed according to maternal age, and AMH- and AFC-derived ovarian ages were compared among three different cytogenetic groups (normal karyotype, autosomal trisomies, and other chromosomal anomalies) in both ongoing pregnancies and miscarriages. RESULT(S): In autosomal trisomies, the median AFC-derived ovarian age was 3-5 years above the median maternal age. No differences were observed between AMH-derived ovarian age and maternal age. CONCLUSION(S): AFC-derived ovarian biologic age reflects a more precise background risk for fetal aneuploidy that is not observed for AMH-derived age.