Primary myocutaneous flap closure following resection of locally advanced pelvic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Perineal wounds, created at the time of extended resection for locally advanced malignancy and following chemoradiation, are at risk of serious complications. METHODS: To determine whether immediate myocutaneous flap closure prevents complications, 57 patients treated with multimodality therapy and proctectomy (35 perineal wounds) or sacrectomy (22 posterior wounds) were studied. Patients were categorized according to whether they underwent primary skin and pelvic closure (group 1; ,n = 20); primary skin and omental pelvic closure (group 2; n = 24); or immediate myocutaneous flap closure (group 3; n = 13). RESULTS: Groups were similar with respect to age and sex; however, group 1 had more primary tumours and required less radical surgery and chemoirradiation than groups 2 and 3. Groups 1 and 2 experienced more complications overall (eight of 20, nine of 24 and three of 13 patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively), more acute wound complications (seven of 20, nine of 24 and two of 13), delayed wound healing (three of 20, six of 24 and one of 13) and more reoperations for perineal wound problems (five of 20, seven of 24 and zero of 13). Patients in group 2 had a significantly longer hospital stay than those in group 1. Flap closure (group 3) did not increase the length of stay. The routine use of primary flap closure reduced overall wound complications (eight of 31 versus ten of 26 patients) and length of hospitalization (13 versus 17 days). CONCLUSION: Complete wound healing was achieved in all patients; however, immediate myocutaneous flap closure reduced the need for readmission and reoperation.

Accuracy of computed tomography in determining resectability for locally advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancers.

AIM: To determine the accuracy of computed axial tomography (CT) in determining tumor resectability in patients with locally advanced primary (T4) or locally recurrent colorectal cancer. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 84 patients with "resectable" locally advanced primary rectal cancer (n = 12) or recurrent colorectal cancer (n = 72) were compared with the operative findings to assess the accuracy of abdominal and pelvic CT in determining extent of disease and resectability. RESULTS: At surgery, disease was confined to the pelvis in 63 patients, the abdomen in 7, and involved both the pelvis and abdomen in 14. Computed tomography correctly identified these anatomic sites of tumor in 87% of patients, with 89% and 80% accuracies for pelvic and abdominal disease, respectively. Tumor resection was performed in 71 patients (85%), but was not in 13 patients because of locally unresectable disease in 8 and metastatic disease in 5. The accuracy of predicting tumor-related operability was 85%. With regard to adjacent organ resection, CT was accurate in determining the need for sacrectomy or hysterectomy, but overestimated the need for urinary organ resection. Based on histological examination of resection margins, CT correctly staged (n = 45) or overstaged (n = 9) 54 patients (64%) and understaged the remaining 30. The ability of CT to preoperatively predict a locally advanced tumor after preoperative radiation therapy as not being fixed was 30%, fixed but resectable 75%, and fixed but not resectable 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography is generally reliable at identifying disease as being confined to one region, and for predicting the need for adjacent organ resection. It is less discriminating for predicting local tumor resectability.