Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 57
Filter
1.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 131(7): 459-67, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15776273

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the radiosensitivity effect of the G2/M arrest-abrogating substance, pentoxifylline (PTX), with high dose-rate irradiation (HDRI) and low dose-rate irradiation (LDRI), during which DNA repair and cell proliferation occur. METHODS: Three squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, FaDu, RPMI 2650 and SCC-61, with differences in genomic imbalance and intrinsic radiosensitivity, were irradiated with 140 cGy/min (HDRI) and 0.7 cGy/min (LDRI) in the presence and absence of 2.0 mM PTX. The surviving fraction at 2.0 Gy (SF2) and cell-cycle phase distribution were assessed by DNA flow cytometry analysis and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. RESULTS: With HDRI and LDRI the SF2 of FaDu cells decreased by 38.5% and 27.6%, respectively, while the corresponding figures for RPMI 2650 were 28.5% and 48.5%, and for SCC-61 were 44.2% and 28.6%. Increases in G2 populations were evident after both HDRI and LDRI of all cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: The enhancement in the cytotoxic effect of PTX was statistically significant after HDRI as well as after LDRI in all three cell lines. We therefore conclude that PTX in combination with LDRI is worth further study, both in vitro, for disclosing underlying mechanisms, and in vivo, to confirm the findings.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pentoxifylline/therapeutic use , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cell Survival/radiation effects , DNA Repair/drug effects , DNA Repair/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Flow Cytometry , G2 Phase/drug effects , G2 Phase/radiation effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Tumor Cells, Cultured/drug effects , Tumor Cells, Cultured/radiation effects
2.
J Telemed Telecare ; 7(6): 338-43, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11747635

ABSTRACT

Telemedicine was introduced for weekly tumour case conferences between Sahlgrenska University Hospital and two district hospitals in Sweden. The accuracy of tele-oncology was determined using simulated telemedicine consultations, in which all the material relating to each case was presented but without the patient in person. The people attending the conference were asked to determine the tumour ('TNM') classification and treatment. The patient was then presented in person, to give the audience the opportunity to ask questions and perform a physical examination. Then a new discussion regarding the tumour classification and the treatment plan took place, and the consensus was recorded. Of the 98 consecutive patients studied in this way, 80 could be evaluated by both techniques. Of these 80, 73 (91%) had the same classification and treatment plan in the telemedicine simulation as in the subsequent face-to-face consultation. In four cases the TNM classification was changed and for three patients the treatment plan was altered. The specialists also had to state their degree of confidence in the tele-oncology decisions. When they recorded uncertainty about their decision, it was generally because they wanted to palpate the tumour. In five of the seven patients with a different outcome, the clinical evaluation was stated to be dubious or not possible. The results show that telemedicine can be used safely for the management of head and neck cancers.


Subject(s)
Case Management/organization & administration , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Telemedicine/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Examination , Remote Consultation
3.
Eur J Radiol ; 39(3): 168-75, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11566244

ABSTRACT

In order to document the safety, tolerability and efficacy of gadodiamide outside CNS, an open, non-drug comparative study was performed in patients with tumors of the head and neck region. Fifty adult patients were included and 48 patients received the contrast medium. The examinations were performed on a 1.5 T imager using transverse, non-enhanced T1- and PD-/T2-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences, followed by a contrast-enhanced transverse T1-weighted sequence. Post-contrast images provided more diagnostic information compared to unenhanced images in 33 of 48 patients (69%). This information was of significant help in four and of moderate help in 14 cases. Post-contrast images compared to non-enhanced T1-weighted showed improvement in lesion delineation for 29 of the 43 patients where a lesion was observed. Only in two patients was the diagnostic information lower post-contrast. A comparison between all pre-contrast images versus contrast medium enhanced showed post-contrast images to give more diagnostic information in 14 and less in nine patients. No patient experienced discomfort in relation to gadodiamide injection. Only one adverse event occurred which was described as thirst, being of moderate intensity. The 5-year clinical outcome was analyzed and compared with the pre-operative staging. The case-books of all patients were reviewed and in 44 patients all information could be found. Of those, 18 were still alive, one with active disease (AAD) and 17 with no evidence of disease (NED). Two of those four patients, where information was incomplete, showed NED and two had died. This trial showed that contrast-enhancement using gadodiamide for evaluation of soft tissue tumors in the head and neck region was safe and provided statistically significant more diagnostic information compared with unenhanced images. MRI, when compared with palpation/inspection, changed tumor staging in approximately 30% of all cases.


Subject(s)
Gadolinium DTPA , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnosis , Contrast Media , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors
4.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 14(10 Suppl 9): 79-81, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11098501

ABSTRACT

This is an open-label, nonrandomized phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of UFT plus leucovorin when given concomitantly with hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. The study period is determined by the course of radiotherapy, which is given as 1.7 Gy per fraction twice daily for 5 days (Monday to Friday) in 2 consecutive weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, and subsequently another 2 weeks of radiotherapy (Monday to Friday plus Monday to Thursday). Total duration of therapy will be 5 weeks.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Uracil/administration & dosage
5.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 46(1): 13-9, 2000 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10656366

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the prognostic value of SF2 for local control and survival in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Following informed consent tumor specimens were obtained from 156 patients with primary carcinomas of the head and neck region. The specimens were assessed for the ability to grow in vitro (colony forming efficiency, CFE) and inherent radiosensitivity measured as the surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) using a soft-agar clonogenic assay. Patients were treated mainly with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation therapy usually as a combination of accelerated external beam and interstitial radiotherapy. The probabilities of local control and survival were analyzed by univariate, bivariate and Cox multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Successful growth was achieved in 110/156 specimens and SF2 values were obtained from 99/156. Eighty four out of these patients underwent radical treatment. The median SF2 value for the 84 tumors was 0.40. At a mean follow-up time of 25 months (range 7-65) the median SF2 value of tumors from 14 patients who developed local recurrence was 0.53, which was significantly higher than the median of 0.38 for tumors from 70 patients without local recurrence (p = 0.015). Tumor SF2 was a significant prognostic factor for local control (p = 0.036), but not for overall survival (p = 0.20). Tumor SF2 was an independent prognostic factor for local control within bivariate and Cox multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that tumor radiosensitivity measured as SF2 is a significant prognostic factor for local control in head and neck cancers.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Tolerance , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma/pathology , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 45(4): 1005-10, 1999 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10571209

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The DNA-PK complex is one of the major pathways by which mammalian cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation. This study evaluated the relationship between the immunohistochemical expression of the individual components of DNA-PK and cellular radiosensitivity in head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Biopsies from patients with previously untreated squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck were assessed for inherent tumor radiosensitivity measured as the surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) using a soft agar clonogenic assay. Paraffin-embedded tumor material from 64 successfully grown specimens was immunohistochemically stained for expression of DNA-PKcs and Ku (p70/p80). The same tumor material was previously analyzed for the immunohistochemical expression of p53. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between the degree of expression of DNA-PKcs and Ku (p70/p80) (r = 0.55, p<0.001). There were no overall significant differences in the levels of expression of DNA-PKcs and Ku (p70/p80) in tumors from patients of either sex, different sites, histologies, and stages. No relationship was found between SF2 and the expression of either DNA-PKcs (r = 0.22, p = 0.081) or Ku (p70/p80) (r = 0.064, p = 0.62). Comparison with previous immunohistochemical characterization showed no significant correlations between the expression levels of p53 and either DNA-PKcs (r = 0.093, p = 0.46) or Ku (p70/p80) (r = -0.17, p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that determining the immunohistochemical expression of DNA-PK in head and neck cancers from multiple sites does not have a role as a predictive assay of tumor in vitro radiosensitivity.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Nuclear , Calcium-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DNA Helicases , DNA, Neoplasm/radiation effects , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Head and Neck Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Ku Autoantigen , Male , Radiation Tolerance
7.
Eur J Cancer ; 35(4): 586-95, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10492632

ABSTRACT

A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial was performed to investigate the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) on the quality of life (QoL), appetite, weight and survival of patients with advanced, incurable, hormone-insensitive cancer. QoL was assessed at the start of treatment and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument. 255 patients were randomised to 320 mg of MA daily or placebo for 12 weeks. 244 patients were assessable at baseline, 190 at 4 weeks (placebo 94; MA 96), 150 at 8 weeks (placebo 69; MA 81) and 112 at 12 weeks (placebo 55; MA 57). A beneficial effect of MA on appetite loss was observed at week 4 (P < 0.0001) and possibly at week 8 (P = 0.058). Further weight loss during treatment was significant only in the placebo group. In the first 8 weeks, changes in mean global QoL were small and similar in both groups. By 12 weeks the decrease in mean global QoL was more pronounced in the MA group (P = 0.028), which was related to a deterioration in physical function, while psychosocial function was not affected. Survival was not affected by MA, and side-effects were mild. The results show that MA has a beneficial effect on appetite and that it may retard weight loss with no adverse impact on survival and with mild toxicity. However, MA does not appear to improve global QoL as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30.


Subject(s)
Appetite Stimulants/therapeutic use , Megestrol Acetate/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Palliative Care , Patient Compliance , Weight Loss
8.
Br J Cancer ; 80(9): 1400-4, 1999 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10424742

ABSTRACT

A study was made of the relationship between measurements of radiosensitivity versus proliferation and p53 status in head and neck cancers. Inherent tumour radiosensitivity was assessed as surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) using a clonogenic soft agar assay (n = 77). The results were compared to data on proliferation obtained by both flow cytometry (labelling index (LI), the potential doubling time (Tpot) n = 55) and immunohistochemistry (Ki-67 and PCNA; n = 68), together with immunohistochemical p53 expression (n = 68). There were no overall significant differences in the median values of the various parameters analysed for the different sites within the head and neck region, disease stages, grades of tumour differentiation or nodal states. A subgroup analysis showed that oropharyngeal (n = 22) versus oral cavity (n = 35) tumours were more radiosensitive (P = 0.056) and had a higher Ki-67 index (P = 0.001). Node-positive tumours had higher LI (P = 0.021) and a trend towards lower Tpot (P = 0.067) values than node-negative ones. No correlations were seen between SF2 and any of the parameters studied. The long-standing dogma of an increased radiosensitivity of rapidly proliferating cells in contrast to slowly proliferating cells was not confirmed. The study shows that parallel measurements of different biological markers can be obtained for a large number of patients with head and neck cancers. The independence of the various parameters studied suggests that there may be potential for their combined use as prognostic factors for the outcome of radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen/analysis , Radiation Tolerance , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/analysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cell Division , DNA/biosynthesis , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
9.
Acta Oncol ; 37(6): 539-45, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9860311

ABSTRACT

Tumour cell proliferation during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (RT) can negatively influence the treatment outcome in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accelerated and hyperfractionated RT may therefore have an advantage over conventional RT. Moreover, earlier studies have suggested improved survival with addition of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT). We present here the results of combined treatment with induction and concomitant CT and accelerated hyperfractionated RT in a retrospective series of patients with advanced NSCLC. Between August 1990 and August 1995, 90 consecutive patients, aged 42-77 years (median 63 years), with locally advanced unresectable or medically inoperable NSCLC and good performance status were referred for treatment: stage: I 23%, IIIa 37%, IIIb 40%. Patient histologies included: squamous cell carcinoma 52%, adenocarcinoma 34% and large cell carcinoma 13%. The treatment consisted of two courses of CT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 day 1-3 i.v.), the second course given concomitantly with RT. The total RT dose was 61.2-64.6 Gy, with two daily fractions of 1.7 Gy. A one-week interval was introduced after 40.8 Gy to reduce acute toxicity, making the total treatment time 4.5 weeks. Concerning toxicity, 33 patients had febrile neutropenia, 10 patients suffered from grade III oesophagitis and 7 patients had grade III pneumonitis. There were two possible treatment-related deaths, one due to myocardial infarction and the other due to a pneumocystis carinii infection. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 72%, 46% and 34%, respectively; median survival was 21.3 months. Fifty-nine patients had progressive disease: 21 failed locoregionally, 29 had distant metastases and 9 patients had a combination of these. Pretreatment weight loss was the only prognostic factor found, except for stage. However, the results for stage IIIb were no different from those for stage IIIa. We conclude that the survival results compare favourably with those of most other studies with a manageable toxicity.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
10.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 42(5): 1147-53, 1998 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9869242

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the theoretical and practical value of using low-dose rate (LDR) irradiation to increase the resolution of radiosensitivity testing of primary human tumors using clonogenic assays. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen human tumor cell lines were assessed for surviving fraction at 2-8 Gy (SF2-SF8) using low-dose rate irradiation and a clonogenic assay. Further data were collected from the literature for 64 low-dose rate irradiation survival curves from human tumor cell lines. The data were grouped into five different radioresponsiveness categories (A-E). An analysis was made of the ability of the graded survival levels to discriminate between the different radioresponse groups and compared with previous analyses for high-dose rate SF2. Fifteen human cervical carcinoma specimens were analysed for SF2 and SF3.5 following high- and low-dose rate irradiation. RESULTS: Low-dose rate irradiation increased the spread of tumor cell line radiosensitivity data and the ability to discriminate between radioresponse groups was greater at low than at high-dose rates. Using low-dose rate irradiation on primary tumor specimens and a soft agar clonogenic assay decreased the success rate in obtaining data. The latter dropped from 70% for high-dose rate SF2 to 51% for low-dose rate SF3.5. CONCLUSIONS: The work on cell lines illustrates that low-dose rate irradiation does improve the ability of clonogenic radiosensitivity measurements to discriminate between tumors of different radioresponsiveness groups. However, using low-dose rate irradiation on primary human tumors with a soft agar clonogenic assay was not practical because of reducing the success rate for obtaining data for radiosensitivity measurements.


Subject(s)
Radiation Oncology/methods , Radiation Tolerance , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Humans , Models, Biological , Radiotherapy Dosage , Tumor Cells, Cultured/radiation effects
11.
Head Neck ; 20(6): 540-8, 1998 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9702542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The quality of life (QL) of cancer patients has attracted an increasing interest in recent years. Patients with head and neck cancer often have troublesome symptoms due to the disease and to treatment side effects, which will have an impact on the patient's QL. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of studying QL in relation to well-known clinical parameters. METHODS: Patient's QL was evaluated according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) combined with a diagnosis-specific questionnaire. Quality of life was measured in a cross section of head and neck cancer patients (n = 48) and related to nutritional status, energy intake, severity of disease, and 2-year survival. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of the patients (mean age, 67 years) fulfilled the criteria proposed for malnutrition, and 55% had a negative energy balance. We did not find any correlation between the severity of the cancer disease and the patient's self-rated QL. However, we found significantly better QL ratings among the 2-year survivors (mean, 63; range 52-76 versus mean, 42; range, 31-54; p < .05). There were few correlations between the QL items and malnutrition. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life measurements offer objective information on well-being, sometimes quite opposite that of other clinical parameters, such as tumor stage. Furthermore, QL measurements may be of prognostic value concerning the survival of head and neck cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Eating , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Nutrition Disorders/etiology , Quality of Life , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Weight , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Nutrition Disorders/epidemiology , Nutritional Status , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate
12.
Br J Cancer ; 77(12): 2371-5, 1998 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9649161

ABSTRACT

A study was made of the intrinsic radiosensitivity of 140 biopsy and surgical specimens of malignant head and neck tumours of different histologies. Using a soft-agar clonogenic assay, the material was assessed for the ability to grow in culture (colony-forming efficiency; CFE) and inherent tumour radiosensitivity (surviving fraction at 2 Gy, SF2). The success rate for obtaining growth was 74% (104/140) with a mean CFE of 0.093% (median 0.031) and a range of 0.002-1.3%. SF2 was obtained for 88 of 140 specimens, representing a success rate of 63% with a mean SF2 of 0.48 (median 0.43) and a range of 0.10-1.00. There were no significant differences in radiosensitivity between different sites of the head and neck region. There were no significant relationships between SF2 and disease stage, nodal status, tumour grade, patient age, primary tumour growth pattern and CFE. The results were compared with those for other tumour types previously analysed with the same assay. The distribution of the SF2 values for the head and neck tumours was similar to that for 145 cervix carcinomas and there was no significant difference in mean radiosensitivity between the two tumour types. Also, there was no significant difference in radiosensitivity between head and neck tumours and either breast or colorectal cancers. However, a group of eight lymphomas was significantly more radiosensitive. These results confirm the feasibility of carrying out radiosensitivity measurements using a soft-agar clonogenic assay on head and neck tumours. In addition, the work has shown that radiosensitivity is independent of many clinical parameters and that the mean value is similar to that reported for cervix carcinomas.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Tolerance , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Tumor Cells, Cultured/radiation effects
13.
Laryngoscope ; 108(5): 747-59, 1998 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9591558

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to prospectively monitor the quality of life of laryngeal cancer patients, to compare the quality of life of patients with small tumors with that of patients with large tumors, and to test any quality of life difference in patients with small tumors treated with conventional versus hyperfractioned accelerated radiation therapy. Patients having had a laryngectomy within the study year were also analyzed separately. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), the EORTC Head and Neck Module (H&N-37), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale were administered six times during 1 year. These questionnaires were found to be suitable for measuring laryngeal cancer patients' quality of life longitudinally. The questionnaires were sensitive to differences in quality of life for small versus large tumors and showed that hyperfractioned accelerated radiation therapy was advantageous compared with conventional radiation therapy with respect to quality of life at the 1-year follow-up.


Subject(s)
Laryngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Laryngectomy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Radiother Oncol ; 44(3): 237-44, 1997 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9380822

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcome after radical radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer in 50 patients (38 patients with stage T1-2 and 12 patients with stage T3) after a median follow-up time of 45 months (range 18-92 months). METHODS: The treatment was given by combination of external beam radiotherapy (50 Gy) and brachytherapy (2 x 10 Gy). The brachytherapy was given using TRUS-guided percutaneously inserted temporary needles with a high dose rate remote afterloading technique with Ir-192 as the radionuclide source. Three target definitions and dose levels inside the prostate gland were used. Local control was evaluated by digital rectal examination, TRUS-guided biopsies and serum PSA evaluations. RESULTS: Clinical and biopsy verified local control was achieved in 48 of the 50 (96%) patients; for stage T1-2 in 37 of 38 (97%) patients and for stage T3 in 11 of 12 (92%) patients. A posttreatment serum PSA level < or =1.0 ng/ml was seen in 42 (84%) patients, values from >1.0 to < or =2.0 ng/ml were seen in four (8%) patients and values exceeding 2.0 were seen in four (8%) patients. The late toxicity was minimal. CONCLUSION: The local control results and the minimal toxicity after the combined radiotherapy treatment are promising. However, long term results are necessary before general use.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Iridium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Penile Erection/radiation effects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Urination Disorders/etiology
15.
Radiother Oncol ; 44(3): 245-50, 1997 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9380823

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Localized prostate cancer was treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate Ir-192 brachytherapy with the purpose of a high dose. The technical aspects of a modified treatment are described. METHODS: The brachytherapy was given in two sessions preceded and succeeded by external beam radiation. The radioactive source was temporarily implanted by a remote afterloading device through six to 15 needles inserted transperineally guided by transrectal ultrasound. The entire prostate gland was included in the clinical target volume. The urethra and the tumour volume could be defined and irradiated to different dose levels in more than 90% of the patients. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated. The total dose to the prostate was approximately 70 Gy and to the tumour volume 80 Gy. By calculating the corresponding dose given by 2.0 Gy fractions, considering the radiobiology by using the LQ formula and assuming an alpha/beta value for prostate tissue of 10, the dose to the prostate was approximately 84 Gy and to the tumour volume 112 Gy. For the late effects to the urethra an alpha/beta value of 3 was used, which corresponds to 85 Gy. The brachytherapy could be given with accuracy except when the dorsal border of the prostate was concave. The dose distribution then tended to be less satisfactory. Post-treatment calculations showed that the maximum dose to the rectum was 67 Gy (radiobiologically corrected to 88 Gy), given in a small volume. The early side effects from the brachytherapy were minimal. The treatment could not be performed as intended in four patients; three patients had a narrow pelvis and in one patient the prostate was unusually resilient, preventing the needles from being positioned properly. CONCLUSIONS: This modification of a previously reported brachytherapy technique for prostate carcinoma permits a high radiation dose to the tumour and to the prostate gland, which ultimately may improve local control.


Subject(s)
Iridium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Male , Prostate/radiation effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiotherapy Dosage , Ultrasonography
16.
Oral Oncol ; 33(3): 189-96, 1997 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9307728

ABSTRACT

The aim of this longitudinal quality of life (QL) study, was to study tumour-related symptoms and treatment side-effects of patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer and to determine whether an increased local dose of irradiation (brachytherapy affected QL. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), a tumour-specific Head and Neck questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) were used repeatedly during 1 year. There were 105 patients, with a cumulative response rate of 89%. Most symptoms and problems were at their peak 2 or 3 months after the start of treatment. Nutrition and pain were found to be the major problems, and as many as 19-40% reported psychiatric distress. Patients having received additional brachytherapy did not report any increase in QL problems (except for pain) compared with those having had external radiation only. Quality of life does not seem to be affected by the increased irradiation local dose given when brachytherapy is included in the treatment regimen.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/psychology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Radiotherapy Dosage , Time Factors
17.
Radiother Oncol ; 43(1): 23-8, 1997 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9165133

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 1986 a prospective, randomized, multi-centre trial for evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was initiated. As survival in this group of patients is poor the purpose was to find a possible survival benefit of the chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy only. METHODS: Four-hundred sixty-one patients from Denmark, Norway and Sweden with tumors in oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx were randomized to receive either standard treatment (radiotherapy or radiotherapy followed by surgery) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by standard treatment. Chemotherapy included three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on day 1 followed by 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 per day continuous i.v. infusion for 120 hours. Radiotherapy 64-70 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction, 5 times/week, was given to patients in both treatment arms. RESULTS: Response rate was 71% for patients randomized to chemotherapy-radiotherapy and 66% for patients randomized to standard treatment (not statistically significant). Residual tumors were excised if possible. After surgery 62% of the patients randomized to chemotherapy-radiotherapy and 60% of the patients in the standard treatment group were clinically tumor free. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant benefit in survival was observed for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. Nor was there any impact of chemotherapy on the number of patients achieving loco-regional tumor control after primary treatment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate
18.
Eur Respir J ; 9(12): 2565-72, 1996 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8980970

ABSTRACT

In order to assess the value of radiotherapy in the treatment of pleural mesotheliomas, we studied tumour response and survival after hemithorax irradiation alone (RT), or radiotherapy combined with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy (RTCT). Forty seven patients with pleural mesotheliomas received irradiation of the diseased hemithorax at 8 MV (megavolt) photons to a total dose of 40 Gy, administered in 20 daily fractions of 2 Gy for 5 days a week. One month after RT, patients aged < or = 70 yrs with a good performance status were offered supplementary chemotherapy (CT) with doxorubicin 30 mg.m-2 body surface on Day 1 and Day 8, combined with cyclophosphamide 600 mg.m-2 on Day 1, in cycles of 21 days. Tumour response was evaluated by computed axial tomography (CAT) before and 1 month after RT and/or CT. Only 3 of the 47 (95% confidence interval (95% CI)-0.6-13%) irradiated tumours responded with a partial response (PR). In 31 patients treated with RT alone, one PR was observed; whereas, in the combined treatment group, 2 out of 16 responded with PR to RT. CT with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide induced only 2 out of 16 PRs (95% CI -3.4-28.4%), and the combined treatment consisting of RT followed by CT induced 2 out of 16 PRs. The median survival following the initiation of RT was 7 months in all patients (n = 47), 6 months in the RT group (n = 31), and 13 months in the combined RTCT group (n = 16). Chest pain, performance status and body weight were not favourably affected by the radiotherapy. We conclude that hemithorax irradiation of pleural mesotheliomas with a moderately high dose is not useful, since it produces no improvement in chest pain, few objective tumour responses and no prolongation of survival.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Mesothelioma/drug therapy , Mesothelioma/radiotherapy , Pleural Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pleural Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Mesothelioma/mortality , Pleural Neoplasms/mortality , Radiotherapy Dosage , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
19.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 116(6): 906-12, 1996 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8973731

ABSTRACT

Different treatment modalities for advanced laryngeal cancer are much discussed in the literature. One-hundred-and-sixty patients with T3-4, N0-3, M0-1 laryngeal cancer diagnosed in Sweden between 1986 and 1990 were retrospectively analysed. One hundred (65 T3: 35 T4) received radical radiotherapy with salvage surgery (RRSS) in case of residual or recurrent disease. Thirty-eight (11T3: 27 T4) patients received surgery with or without radiotherapy (S +/- RT). Twenty-two patients received no treatment. After a median follow up of 4.4 years, the estimated 5-year actuarial corrected survival and 3-year locoregional control were 59% and 44% for T3 RRSS and 47% and 54% for T3 S +/- RT. No significant difference between the different treatment modalities was found. The 5-year corrected survival rate and the locoregional control at 3 years between T4-RRSS (32%; 26%) and T4-S + RT (58%; 68%) groups were significantly different (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). This might suggest that surgery with or without radiotherapy still has its place as a treatment modality for patients with advanced T4 laryngeal carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma , Laryngeal Neoplasms , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Rate , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Carcinoma/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Laryngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Laryngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiology
20.
Eur J Cancer ; 32A(11): 1893-900, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8943671

ABSTRACT

The aim of this randomised trial was to investigate the effect of induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy on survival in 302 patients with non-resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Radiotherapy, 56 Gy to the chest, was given to 154 patients and combined treatment, with chemotherapy preceding the radiotherapy, to 148 patients. Chemotherapy consisted of three courses of cisplatin (120 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 i.v. for 3 days) administered every fourth week. Median survival was 10.5 months in the radiotherapy arm and 11 months in the combined treatment arm. The 2-year survival rate was 17% in the radiotherapy arm and 21% in the combined treatment arm. Addition of chemotherapy seemed to significantly improve survival, according to the Cox multivariate analysis (P = 0.04), but as only a trend according to life-table analysis (P = 0.11). Chemotherapy also accomplished a trend towards improved local control (P = 0.08) and towards decreased metastatic disease (P = 0.10). 2 patients in the combined treatment arm, but none in the radiotherapy arm, died from toxicity. The conclusion was that the value of the chemotherapy used in this study was very modest, but the results strongly support further research for more efficient drugs and combinations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Etoposide/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...