Office hysteroscopy in the management of women with postmenopausal bleeding.

Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a relevant aspect for health-care providers in clinical practice: the first objective is to rule out potential gynecological cancer. The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the role of office hysteroscopy in the management of PMB. Office hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive procedure allowing direct visualization of uterine pathology without the need for general anesthesia and the use of an operating room, generating cost savings and greater compliance among patients. Here, we focus on major intrauterine diseases (polyps, submucosal myomas, endometrial hyperplasia, and cancer) as causes of PMB. Office hysteroscopy appears to be safe and feasible, and could allow accurate diagnosis of intrauterine pathologies, especially that with a focal growth pattern, otherwise misdiagnosed with blinded procedures. However, studies focusing exclusively on postmenopausal women are still few, so further research, especially randomized controlled trials, is needed.

Endometrioma size is a relevant factor in selection of the most appropriate surgical technique: a prospective randomized preliminary study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the ovarian reserve in patients with different-sized endometriomas undergoing cystectomy or ablative surgery in order to determine the best surgical approach to safeguard healthy ovarian tissue. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized study on 48 patients with unilateral single ovarian endometriomas. Patients were allocated into two groups based on endometrioma size: <5cm (n=26, Group A, small endometriomas) and ≥5cm (n=22, Group B, large endometriomas). Each group was randomized to coagulation or excision treatment (1:1 ratio) before the procedure. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were evaluated before surgery and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Both ablation and excision resulted in a significant reduction in AMH level regardless of endometrioma size. A significant interaction effect was observed between endometrioma size and type of surgical technique (analysis of covariance p for interaction=0.039): in Group A, no significant difference was found between the two surgical techniques (-17.6±4.7% vs -18.2±10.6%), whereas in Group B, the excision group showed a significantly greater percentage decrease in AMH level compared with the ablation group (-24.1±9.3% vs -14.8±6.7%, p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Both ablative and excision treatment of endometriomas have a negative effect on ovarian function. Endometrioma size is associated with the magnitude of ovarian reserve damage following excision treatment, but in the case of ablative treatment, the decrease in AMH serum level is independent of the size of the cyst. In surgical treatment of large endometriomas, the decrease in AMH level is more consistent and much more severe following cystectomy than ablation.