Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662935

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires that all graduate medical education (GME) programs provide at least 6 paid weeks off for medical, parental, and caregiver leave to residents. However, it is unclear whether all orthopaedic residency programs have adapted to making specific parental leave policies web-accessible since the ACGME's mandate in 2022. This gap in policy knowledge leaves both prospective and current residents in the dark when it comes to choosing residency programs, and knowing what leave benefits they are entitled to when having children during training via birth, surrogacy, adoption, or legal guardianship. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs provide accessible parental leave policies on their program's website, their GME website, and through direct contact with their program's administration? (2) What percentage of programs offer specific parental leave policies, generic leave policies, or defer to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)? METHODS: As indicated in the American Medical Association's 2022 Freida Specialty Guide, 207 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic residency programs were listed. After further evaluation using previous literature's exclusion criteria, 37 programs were excluded based on osteopathic graduate rates. In all, 170 ACGME-accredited allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs were identified and included in this study. Three independent reviewers assessed each program website for the presence of an accessible parental leave policy. Each reviewer accessed the program's public webpage initially, and if no parental leave policy was available, they searched the institution's GME webpage. If no policy was found online, the program administrator was contacted directly via email and phone. Available leave policies were further classified into five categories by reviewers: parental leave, generic leave, deferred to FMLA, combination of parental and FMLA, and combination of parental and generic leave. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that 6% (10 of 170) of orthopaedic residency programs had policy information available on their program's main orthopaedic web page. Fifty nine-percent (101 of 170) of orthopaedic residency programs had a clearly stated policy on their institution's GME website. The remaining 35% (59 of 170) had no information on their public website and required direct communication with program administration to obtain policy information. After directly contacting program administration, 12% (21 of 170) of programs responded to researchers request with a PDF explicitly outlining their policy. Twenty-two percent (38 of 170) of programs did not have an accessible policy available. Of the programs that had available policies, a total of 53% (70 of 132) of programs were categorized as offering explicit parental leave policies, 9% (12 of 132) were categorized as offering general leave policies, and 27% (36 of 132) deferred to FMLA. Seven percent (9 of 132) offered combined parental leave policies with FMLA, and 4% (5 of 132) offered combined general leave policies with FMLA. CONCLUSION: Although most ACGME-accredited allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs met the ACGME requirement of written parental leave policies in 2023, a small minority of programs have clear, accessible parental leave policies provided on their webpage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Parental leave policies should be easily accessible to prospective and current trainees and should clearly state compensation and length of leave. Ensuring orthopaedic surgery residency programs provide accessible and transparent parental leave policies is important for maintaining diversity in prospective applicants and supporting the work-life balance of current residents.

2.
Am J Sports Med ; 52(1): 116-123, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative risk factors contributing to poor outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) have not yet been consolidated and codified into an index scoring system used to predict APM success. PURPOSE: To create an index score using available preoperative factors to predict the likelihood of favorable postoperative outcomes after APM. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of patients undergoing primary APM were enrolled in this study. Patients completed pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires that included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12 Physical and Mental), and Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS). Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate independent predictors of KOOS Pain, Symptoms, and Activities of Daily Living scores and achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB). The authors assigned points to each variable proportional to its odds ratio, rounded to the nearest integer, to generate the index score. RESULTS: In total, 468 patients (mean age, 49 years [SD, 10.4 years; range, 19-81 years]) were included in this study. In the univariate analysis, shorter symptom duration, lower Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade, lower preoperative KOOS Pain value, and lower VR-12 Physical score were associated with a higher likelihood of clinical improvement at 1 year. In the multivariable model for clinical improvement with MCID, symptom duration (<3 months: OR, 3.00 [95% CI, 1.45-6.19]; 3-6 months: OR, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.10-3.72], compared with >6 months), KL grade (grade 0: OR, 3.54 [95% CI, 1.66-7.54]; grade 1: OR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.48-6.26]; grade 2: OR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.02-5.27], compared with grade 3), and preoperative KOOS Pain value (score <45: OR, 3.00 [95% CI, 1.57-5.76]; score of 45-60: OR, 2.80 [95% CI, 1.47-5.35], compared with score >60) were independent significant predictors for clinical improvement. The scoring algorithm demonstrated that a higher total score predicted a higher likelihood of achieving the MCID: 0 = 40%, 1 = 68%, 2 = 80%, 3 = 89%, and 4 = 96%. CONCLUSION: Using this model, the authors developed an index score that, using preoperative factors, can help identify which patients will achieve clinical improvement after APM. Longer symptom duration and higher KL grade were associated with a decreased likelihood of clinical improvement as measured by KOOS Pain at 1 year postoperatively.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Meniscectomy , Humans , Middle Aged , Case-Control Studies , Pain/etiology , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Treatment Outcome
3.
Am J Sports Med ; 50(11): 2909-2916, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35916744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasing over time in pediatric/adolescent populations, but there is less evidence to support how concomitant meniscal procedures are changing over time. There are also less data to suggest which characteristics are associated with meniscectomy versus meniscal repair treatment. HYPOTHESIS: Age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and insurance type may independently affect the rate of concomitant meniscal procedures and treatment modalities in pediatric patients with ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for all patients aged ≤18 years who underwent ACL reconstruction with or without concomitant meniscal procedures from 2015 to 2019. Basic demographic data including age, sex, self-identified race/ethnicity, rural-urban commuting area code, predicted median income, and insurance status were collected. Linear regression was used to model trends and multiple logistic regression modeling was used to test for associations. RESULTS: A total of 14,398 patients aged ≤18 years underwent ACL reconstruction during the study period, with 8337 patients (58%) having concomitant meniscal procedures with a 1.24-fold increase over 5 years. Of the concomitant meniscal treatment cohort, 41% had a meniscectomy and 59% had meniscal repair. There was a 0.82-fold change in meniscectomy and a 1.67-fold increase in meniscal repair during the study period. Male patients, older patients, Black race, living in an urban area, and those with nonprivate insurance had increased odds of undergoing a concomitant meniscal procedure (all P < .05). Patients of non-White race and those with nonprivate insurance had increased odds of having a meniscectomy versus meniscal repair (all P < .05). There were no associations detected between income bracket and the outcomes in this study. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, there was a rise in concomitant meniscal procedures from 2015 to 2019. In addition, patients of non-White race and those with nonprivate insurance have increased odds of undergoing meniscectomy versus meniscal repair.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Tibial Meniscus Injuries , Adolescent , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/complications , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/epidemiology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Child , Ethnicity , Humans , Male , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/complications , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/epidemiology , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/surgery
4.
World J Surg ; 46(7): 1587-1599, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35006329

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The negative effects of bullying, discrimination, harassment, and sexual harassment (BDHS) on well-being and productivity of surgical residents in training have been well documented. Despite this, little has changed over the past decade and these behaviors continue. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of each abusive behavior experienced by residents, identify the perpetrators, and examine the reporting tendency. METHODS: A systematic review of articles published between 2010 and 2020 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed following PRISMA guidelines. The following search terms were used: bullying, harassment, sexual harassment, discrimination, abuse, residency, surgery, orthopedic surgery, general surgery, otolaryngology, obstetrics, gynecology, urology, plastic surgery, and training. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with 29,980 surgical residents were included. Sixty-three percent, 43, 29, and 27% of surgical residents experienced BDHS, respectively. Female residents reported experiencing all BDHS behaviors more often. Thirty-seven percent of resident respondents reported burnout, and 33% reported anxiety/depression. Attending surgeons, followed by senior co-residents, were the most common perpetrators. Seventy-one percent did not report the behavior to their institution. Fifty-one percent stated this was due to fear of retaliation. Of those who reported their experiences, 56% stated they had a negative experience reporting. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates high prevalence rates of BDHS experienced by residents during surgical training, which have been associated with burnout, anxiety, and depression. The majority of residents did not report BDHS due to fear of retaliation. Residency programs need to devise methods to have a platform for residents to safely voice their complaints.


Subject(s)
Bullying , Burnout, Professional , Internship and Residency , Sexual Harassment , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Fear , Female , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 60(5): 1008-1013, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33785239

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the available evidence on peroneal tendon tears and the outcomes after surgical intervention. A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Criteria for inclusion were clinical studies reporting outcomes after treatment for peroneal tendon tear within the last 10 years. Nine studies evaluating 336 patients (146 males/190 females) and 336 ankles were included in this review. The mean age of included patients was 46.3 years (range, 46-56.9 years). The weighted mean follow-up was 23.82 months (range 9.2-78 months. Five surgical interventions were reported: primary repair with tenodesis, primary repair without tenodesis, FDL tendon transfer, FHL tendon transfer, and allograft reconstruction. Four studies recorded the AOFAS score, with a weighted mean preoperative score of 69.58 and a weighted mean postoperative score of 88.82. Six studies measured the VAS score showing an improvement from a mean weighted preoperative score of 4.68 to a mean weighted postoperative score of 1.2. FAAM score was measured in 3 studies, which showed an improvement from 41.1 preoperatively to 84.4 postoperatively. The average overall complication rate was 38.7% (130/336) with the most commonly reported minor complication being ankle pain, which made up 46.2% of all minor complications (56/121). Primary repair without tenodesis was associated with a higher complication rate compared to any other surgical intervention (p=.001176). The current systematic review showed that overall clinical outcomes were positive in lieu of the different modalities of surgical intervention for peroneal tendon tears.


Subject(s)
Tendon Injuries , Tenodesis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rupture/surgery , Tendon Injuries/surgery , Tendon Transfer , Tendons/surgery
6.
Am J Sports Med ; 49(2): 512-521, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196320

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has resulted in upward of 14 million confirmed cases and >597,000 deaths worldwide as of July 19, 2020. The current disruption in sports activities caused by COVID-19 presents a challenge to physicians, coaches, and trainers in discerning best practices for a safe return to sport. There is a distinct need to develop and adopt consistent measures for resumption of sports activities, including training and competition, in a way that places the health and well-being of athletes at the forefront while also protecting coaches, allied staff, and spectators. This article provides an overview of the effects of COVID-19 in the athletic population and presents considerations for training during the pandemic, as well as guidelines for return to sports as restrictions are lifted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sports Medicine , Athletes , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Sports
7.
HSS J ; 16(Suppl 1): 173-178, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32929321
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...