Decision-Making in Endodontics Prior to the Surgical Removal of Large Cysts Involving Vital Teeth.

Introduction Maintaining pulp vitality is crucial; however, treatment options for large lesions may hinder the vitality of the teeth involved within the lesion. Some clinicians are not updated about the diagnostic terminology of the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) which may affect their decision-making. In the literature, there was no absolute treatment to manage such cases. The purpose of this study is to explore different opinions, identify the evidence of practice and treatment options to help in decision-making and assess if clinicians are acknowledged by the AAE guidelines.  Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted through a qualitative survey designed to interview randomly selected endodontists, oral maxillofacial surgeons, oral medicine specialists, oral pathologists, and general partitioners to record their decisions and management about a structured case scenario. A total of 120 participants were included in the study. The interviews were conducted by a single investigator, and the answers were recorded by another investigator. Finally, the responses of the interviewees were collected using Google Forms (Google, Mountain View, California). Results We found that there are dissimilarities between the different groups in decision-making concerning the management of teeth involved in large cystic lesions. Regarding the AEE guidelines, almost all the endodontics and general dentists were aware of the guidelines when compared with the other groups.  Conclusion The management of teeth involved in large cystic lesions is controversial. Furthermore, the AEE guidelines are not a common language between the different disciplines. Randomized clinical trials are needed to investigate the prognosis and management of teeth associated with large cystic lesions.

An overview of systematic reviews on endotoxins in endodontic infections and the effectiveness of root canal therapy in its removal.

Background The objective of this overview was to synthesise the current evidence on the role of endotoxins in endodontics infections and to evaluate the effectiveness of endodontic procedures in its removal using information from published systematic reviews.Methods Electronic databases Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for reviews published up to July 2021. Systematic reviews on endotoxins based on clinical and/or observational studies were included. The quality of systematic reviews was assessed with the AMSTAR2 tool.Results A total of five systematic reviews were selected, of which two reviews were of high quality. A significantly higher level of endotoxins were found in teeth with exudation, teeth with a previous episode of pain and pain on percussion. Chemomechanical preparation of root canals significantly reduce endotoxin levels. Calcium hydroxide intracanal medication in symptomatic teeth was significantly effective in endotoxin reduction (standardised mean difference -1.051 [95% confidence interval -2.039 to -0.063]; p <0.05; I2 = 83.3%; certainty of evidence = very low). Multiple session root canal treatment in teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis was significantly more effective in endotoxins/lipopolysaccharides removal than single-session treatment.Conclusion Limited quality of evidence showed a significant association of endotoxins in infected teeth with clinical symptoms. Conventional chemomechanical preparation of root canals and intracanal medication were unable to eliminate endotoxins from the root canal system. Future evolution of effective disinfection therapies is warranted.

When a Traditional Medicine Customer Becomes a Plastic Surgery Patient.

Traditional medicine therapy is practiced locally in the Middle Eastern communities. The balance between benefit and harm might tip toward the latter if its practice continues unregulated. Herein is a case of a young man who presented to our clinic complaining of keloid scars that developed following a cupping therapy session. He underwent multiple cupping sessions, without prior consent or information regarding potential complications. Finally, we present an algorithm for cupping practitioners to follow to minimize abnormal scarring.

Assessment of the Sterility of New Endodontic Files Received From the Manufacturer Using Microbial Culture and Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis: An In Vitro Study.

Background As endodontic hand files are essential tools for root canal instrumentation and treatment, these instruments have been a constant source of debate regarding whether to reuse them or use them just once. The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the sterility of five brands' new endodontic files received from manufacturers without sterilization before clinical use via microbial culture (bacteria and fungi) and bioburden using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis. Methodology This study included 25 K-type hand files with equal numbers from five brand groups (n=5; groups 1 to 5), named Tia Dent, Prevalent, Mani, Thomas, and Dentsply, respectively. The new files were exposed to microbial culture prior to clinical use and SEM analyses. A Fisher's exact test was performed to compare the differences in contamination among the five tested groups. Results In the SEM, all the five brand groups showed one contaminated file out of five files (20%). Fisher's exact test findings revealed statistically significant variations between the five brand groups, as nine out of 25 (36%) files of the tested groups had positive contamination in the microbial culture experiment. Bacterial contamination was present in three (60%) of the five Tia Dent group files, four (80%) in the Prevalent group files, and two (40%) in the Mani group files. Those with fungal contamination were one (33%) in the Tia Dent group and one (25%) in the Prevalent group (P=0.027). The bacterial culture showed that 100% of the new K-files tested negative in both the Thomas and Dentsply groups. Conclusions This study concluded that there was a bioburden on new endodontic K-type hand files of different brand groups before sterilization or when immediately used.

Herbal Agents versus Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid on Removal of the Smear Layer-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of herbal agents with ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing the smear layer during root canal instrumentation. The research question in the present study was to assess: "Is there a significant difference in reducing smear layer comparing EDTA and herbal agents?" Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from their start dates to April 2022 using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, and reviewed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Only in vitro studies comparing herbal agents with EDTA were included in the current systematic review. Two reviewers independently assessed the included articles. A total of 625 articles were obtained from an electronic database. Eighteen papers were included for review of the full text, out of which, ten papers were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, eight articles were included in the systematic review. The present systematic review considered only in vitro studies; hence, the result cannot be completely translated to strict clinical conditions. The results of the present systematic review have shown that quixabeira, morindacitrifolia, oregano extract, and neem show better smear layer removal compared to other herbal agents, whereas they showed reduced smear layer removal when compared with EDTA. Although, it was seen that most of the included studies did not report a high quality of evidence. Hence, the present systematic review concludes that herbal agents have reported to show inferior smear layer removal when compared to EDTA. Thus, as far as herbal based alternatives are concerned, there is no highest level of evidence to state its real benefit when used as a chelating root canal irrigant.

Effect of mode of rotation on apical extrusion of debris with four different single-file endodontic instrumentation systems: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether single-file endodontic instrumentation systems with the reciprocating type of motion are responsible for more debris extrusion than single-file endodontic instrumentation systems with the full rotational type of motion. Electronic and manual searches were performed following the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis - PRISMA. We included studies comparing rotary (Neoniti and/ OneShape) versus reciprocating (WaveOne and/ Reciproc) systems. We evaluated the quality of studies and performed statistical analysis using R-Project software. Eight studies of high quality were included to perform the meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was also done. The overall risk of bias was too low. In conclusion, single-file reciprocating systems tend to generate more extrusion of debris than single-file rotary systems.

Calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medication for postoperative pain during primary root canal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of CH as an intracanal medicament compared to no dressing and / or other intracanal medicaments to control postoperative pain in patients with apical periodontitis requiring primary root canal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted electronic searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library, Open Gray, and Google Scholar. A structured Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome of the review was as follows: Population: adults who presented with apical periodontitis requiring primary root canal therapy; Intervention: CH intracanal medicament; Comparison: no dressing/other intracanal medicaments; Main Outcome: Postoperative pain. We assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane criteria. Our outcome measures were intensity of pain on a validated scale reported as mean and standard deviation. We performed meta-analysis using the random-effects model. We rated the quality of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: We included 18 studies with 1192 participants. The overall risk of bias was moderate. We found a significant improvement in postoperative pain at 24 hours in favor of CH over no intracanal medication (4 trials, n = 226: standardised mean difference: -0.71; [95% confidence interval: -1.38, -0.03]; P = .04; I2= 78%; moderate certainty evidence). Ledermix (Lederle Germany) (steroid-antibiotic) and chlorhexidine were significantly more effective than CH for controlling pain at 72 hours postprocedure (low certainty evidence). Silver nanoparticles were more effective than CH at 6 and 24 hours and combinations of CH with dexamethasone or lidocaine HCl were significantly more effective than CH alone at improving postoperative pain. Substantial heterogeneity limits the robustness of findings. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence suggests that CH may be an effective intracanal medicament for controlling interappointment pain. Combination therapies appear to be more effective than using CH alone. Further research assessing the comparative effectiveness of interventions for managing postoperative pain following root canal therapy is warranted.