Resilience and recovery from sports related concussion in adolescents and young adults.

INTRODUCTION: Recovery and return to play are important milestones for athletes who sustain sport-related concussions (SRC). Several factors have been shown to influence resolution of post-concussion related symptoms (PCS), but resilience, a trait that reflects the ability to overcome adversity, is another factor that may influence recovery. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship of resilience with resolution of symptoms during recovery in adolescents and young adults following SRC. METHOD: This prospective study is part of the North Texas Concussion Registry (ConTex). Subjects (N = 332) aged 13 to 25 years who sustained a SRC within 10 days of presenting to clinic were evaluated at two time points: initial clinical visit and three-month follow-up. Resilience was measured by the self-report Brief Resilience Survey (BRS) and PCS by the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 Symptom Evaluation Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS). Recovery was determined by self-reported return to sports/physical activity and percent back to normal. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANCOVA and linear regression models showed that lower resilience ratings at initial visit were associated with a greater number and severity of PCSS symptoms along with higher levels of anxiety and depression symptoms during recovery from SRC. At three months, subjects with lower initial resilience ratings were less likely to report feeling back to normal and had greater aggravation of symptoms from physical and cognitive activity even when they had returned to sports/physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Lower resilience was associated with greater symptoms and delayed recovery from SRC. Results suggest that resilience may be another important factor to address in recovery from SRC. Future research is needed to examine the extent to which resilience measured after SRC reflects pre-injury characteristics and to better inform the development of interventions to promote resilience during recovery.

Utility of Brief Psychological Measures for Prediction of Prolonged Symptom Clearance in Concussed Student Athletes.

OBJECTIVE: Variability in recovery time following sport-related concussion (SRC) is poorly understood. We explored the utility of brief mood, anxiety, and sleep questionnaires as postinjury predictors of SRC symptom clearance in adolescents. METHOD: At initial visit 0-2 weeks postinjury, concussed athletes aged 12-18 years self-reported injury/medical factors (prior concussion, loss of consciousness, amnesia, and concussion symptom severity) and were administered psychological symptom measures. At 3 months, medical record review determined return-to-play (RTP) date. Subjects were divided into two datasets, with the first utilized for developing cutoff scores and then validated with the second dataset. RESULTS: A total of 64% of the 141 participants had early RTP (within 21 days postinjury), and 23% had late RTP (postinjury day 30 or later). The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7, M = 2.1, SD = 3.1) was the only significant predictor (p = .001), with a 1.4-fold [95% CI 1.2-1.8] increased risk for every point. No other factors in the full model discriminated recovery groups (ps > .05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis derived a GAD-7 cut score ≥3 (sensitivity= 56.7%, specificity = 74.2%, AUCs = 0.63-0.79, ps < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postconcussion anxiety symptoms may help identify individuals at increased risk for prolonged recovery.

Vascular Abnormalities within Normal Appearing Tissue in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful tool for visualizing traumatic brain injury(TBI)-related lesions. Trauma-induced encephalomalacia is frequently identified by its hyperintense appearance on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. In addition to parenchymal lesions, TBI commonly results in cerebral microvascular injury, but its anatomical relationship to parenchymal encephalomalacia is not well characterized. The current study utilized a multi-modal MRI protocol to assess microstructural tissue integrity (by mean diffusivity [MD] and fractional aniosotropy [FA]) and altered vascular function (by cerebral blood flow [CBF] and cerebral vascular reactivity [CVR]) within regions of visible encephalomalacia and normal appearing tissue in 27 chronic TBI (minimum 6 months post-injury) subjects. Fifteen subjects had visible encephalomalacias whereas 12 did not have evident lesions on MRI. Imaging from 14 age-matched healthy volunteers were used as controls. CBF was assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) and CVR by measuring the change in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI during a hypercapnia challenge. There was a significant reduction in FA, CBF, and CVR with a complementary increase in MD within regions of FLAIR-visible encephalomalacia (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). In normal-appearing brain regions, only CVR was significantly reduced relative to controls (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that vascular dysfunction represents a TBI endophenotype that is distinct from structural injury detected using conventional MRI, may be present even in the absence of visible structural injury, and persists long after trauma. CVR may serve as a useful diagnostic and pharmacodynamic imaging biomarker of traumatic microvascular injury.

Red flags in the clinical interview may forecast invalid neuropsychological testing.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluating assessment validity is expected in neuropsychological evaluation, particularly in cases with identified secondary gain, where malingering or somatization may be present. Assessed with standalone measures and embedded indices, all within the testing portion of the examination, research on validity of self-report in the clinical interview is limited. Based on experience with litigation-involved examinees recovering from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), it was hypothesized that inconsistently reported date of injury (DOI) and/or loss of consciousness (LOC) might predict invalid performance on neurocognitive testing. METHOD: This archival study examined cases of litigation-involved mTBI patients seen at an outpatient neuropsychological practice in Philadelphia, PA. Coded data included demographic variables, performance validity measures, and consistency between self-report and medicolegal records. RESULTS: A significant relationship was found between the consistency of examinees' self-report with records and their scores on performance validity testing, X2 (1, N = 84) = 24.18, p < .01, Φ = .49. Post hoc testing revealed significant between-group differences in three of four comparisons, with medium to large effect sizes. A final post hoc analysis found significance between the number of performance validity tests (PVTs) failed and the extent to which an examinee incorrectly reported DOI r(83) = .49, p < .01. Using inconsistently reported LOC and/or DOI to predict an examinee's performance as invalid had a 75% sensitivity and a 75% specificity. CONCLUSION: Examinees whose reported DOI or LOC differs from records may be more likely to fail one or more PVTs, suggesting possible symptom exaggeration and/or under performance on cognitive testing.s.