Metabolism and disposition of the anticancer quinolone derivative vosaroxin, a novel inhibitor of topoisomerase II.

Background Vosaroxin is a first-in-class anticancer quinolone derivative that is being investigated for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The primary objective of this study was to quantitatively determine the pharmacokinetics of vosaroxin and its metabolites in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods This mass balance study investigated the pharmacokinetics (distribution, metabolism, and excretion) of vosaroxin in cancer patients after a single dose of 60 mg/m2 14C-vosaroxin, administered as short intravenous injection. Blood, urine and feces were collected over 168 h after injection or until recovered radioactivity over 24 h was less than 1% of the administered dose (whichever was earlier). Total radioactivity (TRA), vosaroxin and metabolites were studied in all matrices. Results Unchanged vosaroxin was the major species identified in plasma, urine, and feces. N-desmethylvosaroxin was the only circulating metabolite detected in plasma, accounting for <3% of the administered dose. However, in plasma, the combined vosaroxin + N-desmethylvosaroxin AUC0-∞ was 21% lower than the TRA AUC0-∞ , suggesting the possible formation of protein bound metabolites after 48 h when the concentration-time profiles diverged. The mean recovery of TRA in excreta was 81.3% of the total administered dose; 53.1% was excreted through feces and 28.2% through urine. Conclusions Unchanged vosaroxin was the major compound found in the excreta, although 10 minor metabolites were detected. The biotransformation reactions were demethylation, hydrogenation, decarboxylation and phase II conjugation including glucuronidation.

Phase I and pharmacological study of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1-5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand-foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.

Eribulin mesylate pharmacokinetics in patients with solid tumors receiving repeated oral ketoconazole.

Purpose To study the influence of repeated oral administration of ketoconazole, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the plasma pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate administered by single-dose intravenous infusion. Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor that is currently under development in phase I-III trials for the treatment of solid tumors. Experimental design A randomized, open-label, two treatments, two sequences, crossover phase I study was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors. Treatments were given on day 1 and day 15 and consisted of 1.4 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate alone or 0.7 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate plus 200 mg ketoconazole on the day of eribulin mesylate administration and the following day. Pharmacokinetic sampling for determination of eribulin plasma concentration was performed up to 144 h following administration of eribulin mesylate. Also safety and anti-tumor activity were determined. Results Pharmacokinetic sampling and analysis was completed in ten patients. Statistical analysis of dose-normalized log-transformed AUC0-∞ and Cmax indicated that single-dose exposure of eribulin was not statistically different when co-administered with ketoconazole (ratio of geometric least square means: 0.95 (90%CI: 0.80-1.12) and 0.97 (90%CI: 0.83-1.12), respectively) in patients with solid tumors. Ketoconazole had no effect on eribulin clearance and elimination half-life. The most frequently reported treatment related adverse events were fatigue and nausea, each reported in 8/12 patients. Seven patients (58.3 %) achieved stable disease as best overall response. Conclusions The results indicate that eribulin mesylate can be safely co-administered with ketoconazole. Drug-drug interactions are not expected with other CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate in patients with solid tumors and hepatic impairment.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate in patients with solid tumors with mild and moderate hepatic impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase I, pharmacokinetic study was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors and normal hepatic function or Child-Pugh A (mild) or Child-Pugh B (moderate) hepatic impairment. Treatments were given on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle and consisted of 1.4, 1.1 and 0.7 mg/m(2) eribulin mesylate, for normal hepatic function, Child-Pugh A and B hepatic impairment, respectively. Also safety and anti-tumor activity were determined. RESULTS: Hepatic impairment increased exposure to eribulin. In patients with Child-Pugh A (N = 7) and Child-Pugh B (N = 5), mean dose-normalized AUC(0-∞) was 1.75-fold (90 % confidence intervals (CI): 1.16-2.65) and 2.48-fold (90 % CI: 1.57-3.92) increased, respectively, compared with patients who have normal function (N = 6). The most frequently reported treatment-related events were alopecia (12/18) and fatigue (7/18) and these were observed across all groups. Nine patients (50 %) had stable disease as best response. CONCLUSIONS: A reduced dose of 1.1 and 0.7 mg/m(2) of eribulin mesylate is recommended for patients with Child-Pugh A or B hepatic impairment, respectively.

Phase I evaluation of telatinib, a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Blocking both receptor and ligand of the vascular endothelial growth factor (receptor) VEGF(R) pathway might be feasible and increase antitumor activity. This phase I study investigated telatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-2, combined with bevacizumab, in adults with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated in successive cohorts with telatinib (twice-daily continuously, 450-900 mg) or bevacizumab (bi-weekly, starting dose 5 mg/kg). Safety, pharmacokinetics, endothelial (progenitor) cell (E(P)C)/growth factor kinetics and efficacy were assessed. RESULTS: Most frequent adverse events were pain, nausea, voice changes and fatigue. Five dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred: hypertension (cohort I and II), bowel perforation, lipase increase and atrial flutter (cohort III). Cumulative toxicity resulted in a bevacizumab dose reduction to 1 mg/kg (cohort III). Due to three DLTs (n = 14), this cohort represented the best-tolerated dose level. Bevacizumab effectively neutralized plasma VEGF even at 1 mg/kg. Twelve patients had stable disease (clinical benefit 46%). EPC and SDF-1α levels increased during monotherapy telatinib. CONCLUSIONS: Telatinib (450 mg b.i.d.) combined with bevacizumab (1 mg/kg bi-weekly) shows antitumor activity, but accumulating constitutional toxicity impedes long-term treatment of patients. Therefore, this combination will not be pursued in a phase II setting.