A qualitative study to understand the Duchenne muscular dystrophy experience from the parent/patient perspective.

BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, severe, fatal neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive atrophy and muscle weakness, resulting in loss of ambulation, decreased upper body function, and impaired cardiorespiratory function. This study aimed to generate qualitative evidence to describe the primary symptoms and impacts of DMD in ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients as reported by patient/caregiver dyads. Information was also gathered on expectations for future DMD treatments. METHODS: Forty-six dyads (caregiver and patients with DMD aged 4 to 22 years) participated in 60-min semi-structured video interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Differences in experiences with DMD by ambulation status were examined. RESULTS: Mean ages of ambulatory (n = 28) and non-ambulatory participants (n = 18) were 8.7 and 11.3 years, respectively, with an average age of diagnosis of 3.7 years (SD = 2.3). The primary symptoms reported by both groups were lack of strength (ambulatory: n = 28, 100.0%; non-ambulatory: n = 17, 94.4%) and fatigue (ambulatory: n = 24, 85.7%; non-ambulatory: n = 14, 77.8%). Physical function was the domain that was most impacted by DMD, with participants describing progressive decline of physical function due to loss of physical strength as the primary defining feature of the disease across all stages of ambulatory ability. For those who maintained ambulatory ability at the time of the interview, physical function impacts described impaired mobility (e.g., climbing stairs: n = 16, 57.1%; running: n = 13, 46.4%), impaired upper body function, in particular fine motor skills like holding a pen/pencil or buttoning clothes (n = 17, 60.7%), problem with transfers (e.g., getting off the floor: n = 10, 35.7%), and activities of daily living (ADLs; n = 15, 53.6%). For non-ambulatory participants, the functional impacts most frequently described were problems with transfers (e.g., getting in/out of bed: n = 13, 72.2%; getting in/out of chair or position in bed: both n = 10, 55.6%), impaired upper body function (reaching: n = 14, 77.8%), and ADLs (n = 15, 83.3%). Meaningful treatment goals differed by ambulatory status; for ambulatory participants, goals included maintaining current functioning (n = 20, 71.4%), improving muscle strength (n = 7, 25.9%), and reducing fatigue (n = 6, 22.2%). For non-ambulatory participants, these included increased upper body strength (n = 8, 42.1%) and greater independence in ADLs (n = 6, 31.6%). A preliminary conceptual model was developed to illustrate the primary symptoms and physical function impacts of DMD and capture their relationship to disease progression. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the limited qualitative literature by characterizing impacts of physical limitations and symptoms of DMD on disease progression and thus providing insights into the lived experience with DMD. Differences in treatment goals were also identified based on ambulatory status. Taken together, these findings can help inform patient-centered measurement strategies for evaluating outcomes in DMD clinical research.

Concept Elicitation Interviews and Conceptual Model to Understand the Patient Experience of Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) are a group of rare and heterogeneous disorders involving progressive wasting of shoulder and pelvic girdle musculature. This study aimed to generate qualitative evidence on patient and caregiver experiences with symptoms and impacts of LGMD on overall function and daily life for sarcoglycanopathy subtypes 2C/R5, 2D/R3, and 2E/R4. METHODS: Twenty-three individuals with LGMD with (n = 5) or without (n = 18) a caregiver participated in 60-minute semi-structured video interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Differences in patient experience by ambulation status and LGMD subtype were examined. RESULTS: Participants were ambulatory (n = 14) and non-ambulatory (n = 9), representing three subtypes: 2C/R5 (n = 4), 2D/R3 (n = 12), and 2E/R4 (n = 7), with mean age of 34.8 years (SD = 16.08). 56.5% identified as female. Conceptual saturation was achieved within 18/23 interviews. Ambulatory participants identified difficulty with complex physical activities, e.g., running (n = 11, 78.6%), physical strength (n = 14, 100%), and difficulty with transfers, e.g., difficulty getting off the floor (n = 10, 71.4%). All non-ambulatory participants discussed problems with activities of daily living (ADLs) and transfers, e.g., getting in/out of bed and upper extremity function, particularly reaching (n = 8, 88.9%) and fine motor skills (n = 6, 66.7%). Fatigue and pain were reported by the majority of participants (n = 16, 69.6% and n = 19, 82.6%, respectively). A conceptual disease model was developed illustrating symptoms and impacts and their relationships to disease stage, capturing the patient experience across LGMD disease trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the limited evidence describing the patient experience of living with LGMD. The conceptual model can inform patient-centered assessment in future LGMD clinical trials.

A randomized, controlled trial of ZYN002 cannabidiol transdermal gel in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome (CONNECT-FX).

BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is associated with dysregulated endocannabinoid signaling and may therefore respond to cannabidiol therapy. DESIGN: CONNECT-FX was a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial assessing efficacy and safety of ZYN002, transdermal cannabidiol gel, for the treatment of behavioral symptoms in children and adolescents with FXS. METHODS: Patients were randomized to 12 weeks of ZYN002 (250 mg or 500 mg daily [weight-based]) or placebo, as add-on to standard of care. The primary endpoint assessed change in social avoidance (SA) measured by the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community Edition FXS (ABC-CFXS) SA subscale in a full cohort of patients with a FXS full mutation, regardless of the FMR1 methylation status. Ad hoc analyses assessed efficacy in patients with ≥ 90% and 100% methylation of the promoter region of the FMR1 gene, in whom FMR1 gene silencing is most likely. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients, mean age 9.7 years, 75% males, were enrolled. A total of 169 (79.7%) patients presented with ≥ 90% methylation of the FMR1 promoter and full mutation of FMR1. Although statistical significance for the primary endpoint was not achieved in the full cohort, significant improvement was demonstrated in patients with ≥ 90% methylation of FMR1 (nominal P = 0.020). This group also achieved statistically significant improvements in Caregiver Global Impression-Change in SA and isolation, irritable and disruptive behaviors, and social interactions (nominal P-values: P = 0.038, P = 0.028, and P = 0.002). Similar results were seen in patients with 100% methylation of FMR1. ZYN002 was safe and well tolerated. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild or moderate. The most common treatment-related TEAE was application site pain (ZYN002: 6.4%; placebo: 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In CONNECT-FX, ZYN002 was well tolerated in patients with FXS and demonstrated evidence of efficacy with a favorable benefit risk relationship in patients with ≥ 90% methylation of the FMR1 gene, in whom gene silencing is most likely, and the impact of FXS is typically most severe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The CONNECT-FX trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03614663).

Establishing the content validity of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents in Prader-Willi syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Excessive daytime sleepiness is common in Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), with prevalence ranging from 52% to 100%. The goal of this study was to establish the content validity (ie, evidence that an instrument measures an intended concept of interest) of the parent/caregiver version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents (ESS-CHAD), a measure of daytime sleepiness, in PWS. METHODS: Qualitative, dyadic semistructured video interviews were conducted with 18 caregivers and their children with PWS from April to June 2020. Concept elicitation and cognitive interview techniques were implemented. Thematic analyses allowed for examination of themes and data patterns. RESULTS: All caregivers (mean age 49 years) were mothers of individuals with PWS who experienced troublesome daytime sleepiness (mean age 14 years). The most prevalent observable signs/symptoms of daytime sleepiness were sleepy/sleepiness (n = 17; 94.4%), tired/tiredness (n = 16; 88.9%), exhaustion/exhausted (n = 5; 27.8%), anxious/stressed (n = 5; 27.8%), irritable/frustrated (n = 5; 27.8%), having tantrums/outbursts (n = 5; 27.8%), and lethargy (n = 4; 22.2%). Daytime sleepiness impacted various aspects of health including mental, emotional, physical, and social well-being. When caregivers were asked about the activities associated with daytime sleepiness, all salient concepts elicited mapped to the ESS-CHAD; saturation was met after the first 4 interviews. Only 2 concepts, after physical exertion and while inactive/bored, did not map. Caregiver statements indicated that these concepts, although related to daytime activities, were atypical of daily routines. The ESS-CHAD was well understood and relevant to caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the content validity of the ESS-CHAD and its appropriateness for evaluating treatment efficacy of daytime sleepiness in PWS. CITATION: Patel VP, Patroneva A, Glaze DG, Davis K, Merikle E, Revana A. Establishing the content validity of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale for Children and Adolescents in Prader-Willi syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(2):485-496.

Determining clinically meaningful thresholds for innovative burn care products to reduce autograft: A US burn surgeon Delphi panel.

Reducing the amount of donor skin needed for definitive wound closure can improve outcomes in patients with severe burns. This Delphi Consensus Panel (DCP) aimed to achieve expert consensus on the percentage reduction in donor skin for autograft that constitutes a clinically meaningful benefit. A two-round DCP of fifteen US burn surgeons was conducted via a web-based survey platform. Fourteen panelists (93.3%) completed both rounds. In Round 2, consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement, was achieved for five of the seven consensus statements. All panelists agreed that a clinically meaningful reduction in the amount of donor skin required would facilitate wound management and decrease donor site morbidity experienced by patients. Furthermore, based on three treatment scenarios, consensus was achieved for a clinically meaningful reduction in the amount of donor skin required for autograft for the adult population in deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burns. Findings from this DCP indicate that an innovative cellular and/or tissue product that would reduce the needed amount of donor skin, by the identified thresholds, has the potential to improve the outcomes for patients with severe burn injuries in a meaningful way.

Estimating Alzheimer's Disease Progression Rates from Normal Cognition Through Mild Cognitive Impairment and Stages of Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) can be conceptualized as a continuum: patients progress from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, followed by increasing severity of AD dementia. Prior research has measured transition probabilities among later stages of AD, but not for the complete spectrum. OBJECTIVE: To estimate annual progression rates across the AD continuum and evaluate the impact of a delay in MCI due to AD on the trajectory of AD dementia and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patient-level longitudinal data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center for n=18,103 patients with multiple visits over the age of 65 were used to estimate annual, age-specific transitional probabilities between normal cognition, MCI due to AD, and AD severity states (defined by Clinical Dementia Rating score). Multivariate models predicted the likelihood of death and institutionalization for each health state, conditional on age and time from the previous evaluation. These probabilities were used to populate a transition matrix describing the likelihood of progressing to a particular disease state or death for any given current state and age. Finally, a health state model was developed to estimate the expected effect of a reduction in the risk of transitioning from normal cognition to MCI due to AD on disease progression rates for a cohort of 65-year-old patients over a 35-year time horizon. RESULTS: Annual transition probabilities to more severe states were 8%, 22%, 25%, 36%, and 16% for normal cognition, MCI due to AD, and mild/moderate/severe AD, respectively, at age 65, and increased as a function of age. Progression rates from normal cognition to MCI due to AD ranged from 4% to 10% annually. Severity of cognitive impairment and age both increased the likelihood of institutionalization and death. For a cohort of 100 patients with normal cognition at age 65, a 20% reduction in the annual progression rate to MCI due to AD avoided 5.7 and 5.6 cases of MCI due to AD and AD, respectively. This reduction led to less time spent in severe AD dementia health states and institutionalized, and increased life expectancy. CONCLUSION: Transition probabilities from normal cognition through AD severity states are important for understanding patient progression across the AD spectrum. These estimates can be used to evaluate the clinical benefits of reducing progression from normal cognition to MCI due to AD on lifetime health outcomes.

Assessing the Relationship between Performance on the University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) and Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the published literature to evaluate how functional capacity, as measured by the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA), relates to other functional measures and real-world outcomes among individuals with schizophrenia. METHODS: The MEDLINE® and Embase® databases were searched to identify joint evaluations with UPSA and key functional outcomes (functional scale measures; generic or disease-specific, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]; or real-world outcomes [residential status; employment status]) in patients with schizophrenia. Pearson correlations were estimated between UPSA scores, HRQoL, other functional scale measures, and real-world outcomes, for outcomes described in at least six studies. RESULTS: The synthesis included 76 studies that provided 73 unique data sets. Quantitative assessment between the Specific Level of Function (SLOF) (n=18) scores and UPSA scores demonstrated a moderate borderline-significant correlation (0.45, p=0.06). Quantitative analysis of the relationship between the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (n=11) and the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (MSIF) (n=6) scales revealed moderate and small nonsignificant Pearson correlations of -0.34 (p=0.31) and 0.12 (p=0.83), respectively. There was a small borderline-significant correlation between UPSA score and residential status (n=36; 0.31; p=0.08), while no correlation was found between UPSA score and employment status (n=19; 0.04; p=0.88). CONCLUSION: The SLOF was the most often used functional measure and had the strongest observed correlation with the UPSA. Although knowledge gaps remain, evidence from this review indicates that there is a quantitative relationship between functional capacity and real-world outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia.

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs following first-line antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: a retrospective US claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although the symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) are often manageable with pharmacotherapy, response to first-line antidepressant treatment is often less than optimal. This study describes long-term treatment patterns in MDD patients in the United States and quantifies the economic burden associated with different treatment patterns following first-line antidepressant therapy. METHODS: MDD patients starting first-line antidepressant monotherapy and having continuous enrollment ≥12 months before and ≥24 months following the index date (i.e., the first documented prescription fill) were selected from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan (2003-2014) database. Based on the type of first treatment change following initiation, six treatment cohorts were defined a priori ("persistence"; "discontinuation"; "switch"; "dose escalation"; "augmentation"; and "combination"). Treatment patterns through the fourth line of therapy within each cohort, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost analyses were restricted to patients with adequate treatment duration (defined as ≥42 days) in each line (analysis sub-sample, N = 21,088). HCRU and costs were described at the cohort and pattern levels. Treatment cohorts representing <5% of the analysis sub-sample were decided a priori not to be analyzed due to limited sample size. RESULTS: 39,557 patients were included. Mean age was 42.1 years, 61.1% of patients were female, and mean follow-up was 4.1 years. Among the analysis sub-sample, the discontinuation (49.1%), dose escalation (37.4%), and switch (6.6%) cohorts were the most common of all treatment cohorts. First-line antidepressant discontinuation without subsequent MDD pharmacotherapy (22.9%) and cycling between discontinuation and resumption (11.2%) were the two most common treatment patterns. Median time to discontinuation was 23 weeks. The switch cohort exhibited the highest HCRU (18.9 days with medical visits per-patient-per-year) and greatest healthcare costs ($11,107 per-patient-per-year) following the index date. Treatment patterns representing a cycling on and off treatment in the switch cohort were associated with the greatest healthcare costs overall. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients discontinue first-line antidepressant shortly after initiation. Patterns representing a cycling on and off treatment in the switch cohort were associated with the highest healthcare costs. These findings underscore challenges in effectively treating patients with MDD and a need for personalized patient management.

The effect of vortioxetine on overall patient functioning in patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this meta-analysis of data from randomized, placebo-controlled studies were to assess the effect of vortioxetine on overall functioning (primary) and functional remission (secondary) using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Data from nine short-term (6/8 weeks) pivotal studies that included patient functioning assessments were included in this random-effects meta-analysis, which used aggregated study-level data for all therapeutic vortioxetine doses and a mixed-effect model for repeated measures using the full analysis set. RESULTS: A total of 4,216 patients received ≥1 dose of study treatment (1,522 placebo, 2,694 vortioxetine 5-20 mg/day). At study end, the meta-analysis showed improvement for vortioxetine versus placebo (n = 911) in SDS total score (vortioxetine 5 mg, n = 564, change from baseline versus placebo [Δ] -0.24, p = NS; 10 mg, n = 445, Δ -1.68, p ≤ .001; 15 mg, n = 204, Δ -0.91, p = NS; 20 mg, n = 340, Δ -1.94, p ≤ .01). Functional remission (SDS total score ≤6) was observed with vortioxetine 10 mg (n = 170/573; odds ratio [OR] relative to placebo 1.7, p < .001) and 20 mg (n = 144/447; OR 1.6, p < .05), but not 5 mg (n = 207/757; OR 1.1, p = NS) or 15 mg (n = 92/295; OR 1.3, p = NS). CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine 5-20 mg for 6/8 weeks improved overall patient functioning in patients with MDD. Relative to placebo, vortioxetine 10 and 20 mg demonstrated significant improvement in SDS total score and functional remission.

Determination of a clinically important difference and definition of a responder threshold for the UCSD performance-based skills assessment (UPSA) in patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: This article reports an evaluation of the psychometric properties and clinically important difference (CID) threshold of the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) in major depressive disorder (MDD), using data from a large-scale study of the effects of vortioxetine on cognitive functioning and functional capacity in MDD patients. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe recurrent MDD and self-reported cognitive dysfunction were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with vortioxetine 10/20mg QD (flexible), duloxetine 60mg QD, or placebo. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between UPSA composite score and demographic/disease characteristics at baseline to examine construct validity. Two methods (distribution-based and anchor-based) were used to establish a CID threshold. RESULTS: A total of 602 patients were randomized; 528 comprised the full analysis set. For the entire sample mean UPSA composite scores were 77.8 at baseline and 83.9 at week 8 (mean change, +6.1). As hypothesized, at baseline, the UPSA composite score correlated with cognitive functioning (Digit Symbol Substitution Test: r=0.36, P<0.001) and workplace productivity (Work Limitations Questionnaire: r=-0.17, P=0.008), but not depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale: r=0.02, P=0.707) or subjective cognitive dysfunction (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire: r=-0.02, P=0.698). LIMITATIONS: Two versions of the UPSA were used and no inclusion/exclusion criteria were based on the UPSA. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the construct validity of UPSA for assessing functional capacity independent of mood symptoms. The estimated CID for changes in UPSA scores was quite consistent at +6.4 points and +6.7 based on distribution-based and anchor-based methods, respectively.

A call for comparative effectiveness research to learn whether routine clinical care decisions can protect from dementia and cognitive decline.

Common diseases like diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation are probable risk factors for dementia, suggesting that their treatments may influence the risk and rate of cognitive and functional decline. Moreover, specific therapies and medications may affect long-term brain health through mechanisms that are independent of their primary indication. While surgery, benzodiazepines, and anti-cholinergic drugs may accelerate decline or even raise the risk of dementia, other medications act directly on the brain to potentially slow the pathology that underlies Alzheimer's and other dementia. In other words, the functional and cognitive decline in vulnerable patients may be influenced by the choice of treatments for other medical conditions. Despite the importance of these questions, very little research is available. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation convened an advisory panel to discuss the existing evidence and to recommend strategies to accelerate the development of comparative effectiveness research on how choices in the clinical care of common chronic diseases may protect from cognitive decline and dementia.

Impact of a fixed combination of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 2.5% aqueous gel on health-related quality of life in moderate to severe acne vulgaris.

The acne-specific quality of life (Acne-QoL) questionnaire was developed to measure the impact of facial acne across 4 domains (acne symptoms, role-emotional, self-perception, role-social) of health-related quality of life (HRQL). This analysis assessed the impact of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 2.5% (clindamycin-BPO 2.5%) gel on HRQL in a combined study population (N = 2813) of participants with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Although the results presented within do not include factors of study and study-by-treatment interaction, analyses were performed to confirm that the results were consistent across the 2 identical, double-blind, randomized studies and within each treatment group across studies to justify pooling the data from both studies. The Acne-QoL questionnaire was administered at baseline and at the end of treatment (week 12). Treatment with clindamycin-BPO 2.5% gel significantly improved participant-reported HRQL across all 4 domains compared with individual active ingredients and vehicle (P < .001). The percentage improvement in mean Acne-QoL domain scores with clindamycin-BPO 2.5% gel ranged from 37% to 59%. Because the negative impact of facial acne on HRQL is one of the primary motivators for patients to seek treatment, this analysis underscores the importance of physicians incorporating assessments of HRQL into their clinical decision making.

Cost-effectiveness of intensive lipid lowering therapy with 80 mg of atorvastatin, versus 10 mg of atorvastatin, for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The TNT study compared high dose atorvastatin (80 mg) versus moderate atorvastatin (10 mg) treatment in 10,001 patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD), over 4.9 years. Intensive lipid-lowering with atorvastatin (80 mg) reduced major cardiovascular events by 22%. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive lipid-lowering versus moderate lipid lowering treatment from the perspective of the Canadian Ministries of Health. METHODS: A lifetime Markov model was developed to predict cardiovascular (CV) events, costs, survival, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for CHD patients receiving 80 mg versus 10 mg of atorvastatin. Predictions were also made for 10- and 5-year horizons. Treatment-specific event risks were used until five years. Beyond year five, equivalent CV risks were assumed for all patients. Medical-care costs and post-event survival were estimated using Canadian data. Health utility scores were obtained from published studies. Benefits and costs were discounted 5% annually. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Treatment with atorvastatin (80 mg) over a lifetime horizon resulted in increased costs (Can$16,542 vs. Can$15,365), survival (10.12 vs. 10.03 life years), and QALYs (7.71 vs. 7.61) per patient compared with atorvastatin (10 mg), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness of Can$12,946 per life year gained and Can$11,969 per QALY. The incremental cost per QALY remained below Can$50,000 in 98.1% of 1000 simulations. Results were robust to variations in event hazard ratios, costs, health utility values, and discount rate. CONCLUSION: Intensive atorvastatin (80 mg) treatment is predicted to be cost-effective versus atorvastatin (10 mg) for CHD patients in Canada.

A retrospective analysis of the prevalence and treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia in Southwestern Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Previous evaluations of the Southwestern Ontario (SSWO) cohort have reported that hypertension (HTN) and dyslipidemia (DYS) are undertreated illnesses; however, concomitant treatment is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence and associated treatment of HTN and DYS in primary health care in SWO and to identify care gaps across subpopulations. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, chart-abstracted medical records of patients aged>or=118 years with a clinical diagnosis of HTN, DYS, or both and the clinical practice records of primary health care facilities in London, Ontario, Canada, and the surrounding area were conducted between April and December 2000; longitudinal updates were performed quarterly until December 2004. Chart-abstracted information included demographics, lifestyle (eg, diet, exercise), cardiovascular disease indicators, complete morbidity profile, and drug treatments and effects. RESULTS: The medical records of 46,322 patients who received medical care and the clinical practice records of 37 primary health care facilities (where the patients received treatment) in London, Ontario, Canada, and the surrounding area were included in this study. Our analyses found that the prevalence of HTN (17.66%) was greater than that of DYS (12.33%); with comorbid HTN and DYS found in 8.0% of the population. Most hypertensive patients were not dyslipidemic (54.88%), but more than half of dyslipidemic patients had comorbid HTN (64.99%). Significant differences in prevalence among the sex, age, and comorbid subgroups were found. HTN was higher among females than males (P<0.001) but lower among female smokers than male smokers (P<0.001). Patients aged >55 years were much more likely to be hypertensive, dyslipidemic, or both compared with those aged <55 years (P<0.009), except among those patients with a family history of coronary heart disease (CHD). Additionally, a steady increase in HTN and DYS prevalence with age by decade until 75 years of age, after which the rates dropped off, was observed. Most patients were untreated for HTN (66.00%) or DYS (80.00%) unless both conditions were present (35.00% untreated for HTN; 39.00% untreated for DYS). Among patients with comorbid HTN and DYS, the order of diagnosis had a significant effect on treatment level. The presence of other comorbidities (eg, family history of CHD) resulted in higher treatment and control rates. Control levels were generally poor, with 7.0% among patients with DYS, 15.00% among patients with HTN, and 17.00% among patients with both conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns of HTN and DYS in practice settings are not in alignment with current guidelines in this cohort. Pharmacologic treatment of HTN and DYS is underprescribed. Patients most likely to receive treatment have comorbidities, but even in those high-risk groups, treatment levels are low and recommended control levels even lower.

Choices, persistence and adherence to antihypertensive agents: evidence from RAMQ data.

BACKGROUND: Most treatment recommendations for hypertension are based on criteria that consider efficacy, safety and cost. Given the need for long-term use of antihypertensive agents, treatment compliance should also be taken into consideration in the selection process. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to estimate persistence and adherence to antihypertensive agents in a real-life setting. METHODS: Persistence and adherence to treatment were estimated using data from the Regie de l'assurance maladie du Quebec. RESULTS: Data from a random sample of 4561 subjects with a diagnosis of hypertension covered by the Regie de l'assurance maladie du Quebec drug plan and using one of the antihypertensive agents reimbursed by the drug plan for the first time between January 2000 and December 2001 were analyzed. The persistence rate observed after a two-year period with diuretics was significantly lower (52.8%) than with any other classes of antihypertensive agent (P<0.01). Persistence rates for beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-II receptor blockers and angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitors were 69.3%, 64.3%, 60.9% and 58.9%, respectively. After two years, the proportion of patients who were 80% adherent to their treatment was 64.9% for angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitors, 65.0% for angiotensin-II receptor blockers, 64.2% for calcium channel blockers, 60.3% for beta-blockers and 50.9% for diuretics. The proportion of patients who were 80% adherent to their treatment was significantly lower for diuretics than with any other antihypertensive agents (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Persistence and adherence to treatment are essential to treatment success. Results of the present study indicate that, in a real-life setting, patients are significantly less compliant to diuretics than to any other antihypertensive agents.

Prevalence and treatment of dyslipidemia in Canadian primary care: a retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is an important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies suggest that dyslipidemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in Canada. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe dyslipidemia prevalence, patient characteristics, and lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) patterns in a cohort representing Canadian primary care practice. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, the Southwestern Ontario database (which comprises data from >150,000 adult patients in rural and urban primary care practices) was used as the data source. Male and female patients with data available from 4 physician visits were included; data were captured quarterly between April 2000 and December 2003 and included demographic and lifestyle information, CVD risk factors, and cardiovascular drug treatments. Data gathered included clinical diagnoses at each visit, symptoms corroborating the diagnoses, clinical data (eg, blood pressure, smoking status, height, weight, fitness level), medications (including name, dose, duration, and quantity prescribed), and diagnostic test results and laboratory analyses. For the purposes of this study, a patient was considered to have dyslipidemia if >/=1 of the following conditions was met: (1) physician-diagnosed hyperlipidemia or hypercholes terolemia; (2) at least 1 measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or total cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC:HDL-C) ratio greater than the recommended targets based on 10-year coronary artery disease (CAD) risk; and/or (3) at least 1 prescription for a lipid-lowering drug. RESULTS: A total of 49,667 patients were included in the study cohort. Dyslipidemia was identified in 6961 (14.0%) patients. Of patients with dyslipidemia, more were untreated (63.2%) than treated (36.7%) with LLTs, with women receiving treatment less often than men (P < 0.001). Of those treated, 47.2% had disease that was not adequately controlled, with fewer treated women having controlled disease than treated men (P < 0.017). Patients with dyslipidemia fell mostly into very-high-risk (45.7%) or low-risk (31.1 %) categories for CAD. A total of 73.0% of treated patients were prescribed monotherapy with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin); of starin prescriptions, most were for atorvastatin (51.8%) or simvastatin (29.4%). Initial LDL-C levels and initial TC:HDL-C ratios were statistically similar between patients prescribed atorvastatin and those prescribed simvastatin. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this retrospective cohort analysis, dyslipidemia prevalence in Canadian primary care is high, and despite clinical evidence and treatment guidelines, dyslipidemia is largely untreated in family practice, suggesting a gap in care.

A model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin and simvastatin in achieving Canadian low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets.

BACKGROUND: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Statins differ in their LDL-C-lowering effects and acquisition costs. Atorvastatin and simvastatin are the 2 most commonly used statins in Canada. OBJECTIVE: This analysis compared the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin and generic simvastatin in terms of annual drug cost per patient treated to Canadian LDL-C targets. It was conducted from the perspective of the Canadian provincial drug-reimbursement plans. METHODS: A hypothetical cohort of 1000 dyslipidemic patients was assigned baseline LDL-C serum concentrations and levels of risk for CV disease based on Canadian population data. Canadian data on statin dosing were combined with efficacy data from a published meta-analysis to determine the proportion of patients who would be expected to achieve LDL-C targets after treatment with atorvastatin or generic simvastatin. Statin acquisition costs were obtained from Ontario and Quebec and reported in 2005 Canadian dollars. The sensitivity of the model to changes in drug costs, effectiveness, and persistence with treatment was tested. RESULTS: The model predicted that more patients would reach the LDL-C target with atorvastatin than with simvastatin (73% vs 57%, respectively). The mean annual drug cost per patient treated to target was $54 higher with atorvastatin ($905 vs $851). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, measured as annual drug cost per additional patient treated to target with atorvastatin, was $1088. The model was sensitive to drug cost and effectiveness assumptions. Incorporating real-life rates of adherence into the model had no significant impact on the results. CONCLUSION: In this hypothetical cohort of dyslipidemic patients, treatment with atorvastatin would allow achievement of LDL-C targets in more patients than treatment with simvastatin, at an annual incremental cost of $1088 per additional patient treated to target.

Multivariate framework of the Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urges.

We conducted an investigation of the 10-item Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU-Brief) to confirm its hypothesized two-factor structure and to assess the validity and reliability of its total score and these factors. Data were obtained from a 7-week clinical trial on smoking cessation (N=626). The hypothesized two-factor structure of the QSU-Brief was supported by fit indexes (>0.90) from a confirmatory factor analysis at each of three relevant time points (baseline, Week 2, Week 4). Corresponding values of Cronbach's alpha were acceptable (>0.75) on the Total Craving Score and on Factors 1 and 2. This research supports the validity and reliability of the instrument and confirms the proposed two-dimensional structure of self-reported craving as measured by the QSU-Brief.

Prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension in primary care: gaps, trends, and opportunities.

Since most cases of hypertension are managed in family practice, estimates of the prevalence, treatment, and control in the primary care population are needed to adequately address the burden of hypertension in Canada as it has in other countries. The authors used a large primary care research database to determine the prevalence of hypertension between 2000 and 2003. Blood pressure recordings were used to estimate the rates of prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension for the overall population and for important subgroups. The prevalence of hypertension was 17.3%, most patients had untreated hypertension (68.6%), and only 15.8% had blood pressure treated and controlled. Higher rates of treatment and control were observed among older adults, those with type II diabetes, and those with a previous myocardial infarction. Odds of achieving target blood pressure were significantly better when combination therapy vs monotherapy was used. The prevalence of hypertension in primary care is high and most patients remain untreated; however, increased risk appears to lead to better treatment and control.